Values of the Population in Depressed Territories in the Context of Regional Administration

In Russia, there are a number of depressed areas that lag behind other regions in socio-economic indicators. The use of the term “depressed territories” primarily in economic studies highlights a lack of sociological research on the management aspect that takes into account the socio-cultural characteristics of the population. This study employs the theory of public values as a theoretical

framework, positing that citizens’ attitudes are interconnected with the activities of government authorities. The aim of the research is to identify the distinctive socio-cultural characteristics of the populations in depressed territories that may influence management processes. To achieve this, a survey was conducted among 600 residents of both depressed and non-depressed municipalities with similar characteristics; a quota sampling method was applied, ensuring gender and age distribution within the population. The findings reveal that residents of depressed areas are more committed to values of survival and traditionalism. They exhibit less independence and greater trust compared to those living in non-depressed territories, demonstrating a need for group belonging and possessing closed social capital. The attitudes of residents in depressed municipalities — characterized by a lack of long-term planning, moderation in life, renunciation of ambition, a preference for psychological comfort, and passive waiting for improvements in their quality of life — are less conducive to overcoming adversity. In these areas, there is higher support for government policies among the population, alongside a recognized need for societal stability and adherence to centralized decision-making. The results contribute to the theory of public values by revealing differences in values among municipalities with similar characteristics and determining the potential influence of these values on the socio-economic development of the region. The practical significance of this work lies in developing proposals for utilizing the population’s value orientations in managing depressed territories. Future research prospects include applying the methodology used in this study to other economic regions in Russia.

1. Auzan A. (2022) Kul’turnyye kody ekonomiki. Kak tsennosti vliyayut na konkurentsiyu, demokratiyu i blagosostoyaniye naroda [The cultural codes of the economy. How values influence competition, democracy and people’s welfare]. Moscow: AST.

2. Barabanov A.S., Andreeva M.V., Makoveev V.N., Bazanov A.A. (2019) Research of Depressivity of Territories: Methodology and Practice. RISK: Resursy, Informatsiya, Snabzheniye, Konkurentsiya. No. 2. P. 51–56.

3. Bojang M.B.S. (2022) Beyond Public Management Theories: The Creation of Public Value through Co-Production. Journal of Advanced Research in Economics and Administrative Sciences. Vol. 3. Is. 1. P. 48–56. DOI: 10.47631/jareas.v3i1.397

4. Bozeman B. (2019) Public Values: Citizens’ Perspective. Public Management Review. Vol. 21. No. 6. P. 817–838. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1529878

5. Chernyshev K.A. (2017) The Study of Permanent Migration of Economically Depressed Regions. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz. Vol. 10. No. 4. P. 259–273. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2017.4.52.15

6. Clark G. (1988) Economists in Search of Culture: The Unspeakable in Pursuit of the Inedible? Historical Methods. Vol. 21. P. 161–164.

7. Donskoy D.A. (2023) The Forming an Economic Policy for Sustainable Development of National Production and Territorial Economic Systems under External Constraints. Teoriya i praktika servisa: ekonomika, sotsial’naya sfera, tekhnologii. No. 4. P. 5–9.

8. Durkheim E. (1996) De la division du travail social: étude sur l’organisation des sociétés supérieures. Moscow: Kanon.

9. Ibraeva A.K., Akisheva D.M., Adilbaev K.S. (2021) Theoretical and Methodological Bases for Assessing the Degree of Depressiveness of Regional Systems. Putevoditel’ predprinimatelya. No. 2. P. 98–106. DOI: 10.24182/2073-9885-2021-14-2-98-106

10. Inglehart R., Welzel K. (2011) Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy. The Human Development Sequence. Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo.

11. Isyanbayev M.N. (2017) Depressive Territories: Essence, Formation, Principles of Identification. Vestnik VEGU. No. 4. P. 51–57.

12. Khaidarov S.M., Rakhmatulin A.R. (2024) Problems of Depressed Regions in the Russian Federation and Possible Solutions. Politika i obshchestvo. No. 1. P. 45–54. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0684.2024.1.40753

13. Korkmazov A.V., Cherkesov S.H. (2019) Education and Its Impact on the Formation of Personal Values of Students. Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. No. 3(130). P. 377–378.

14. Marx K. (1961) Kritik des Gothaer Programms. In: Sochineniya. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoye izdatel’stvo politicheskoy literatury. Vol. 19. P. 9–32.

15. Molchanova E.V. (2020) The Demographic Development of the Finno-Ugric Peoples in the Modern World. Natsional’nyye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’. Vol. 16. No. 4. P. 759–779. DOI: 10.24891/ni.16.4.759

16. Mosina L.A., Chuhmanova M.V. (2020) Osobennosti povysheniya kachestva zhizni naseleniya depressivnykh territoriy na sovremennom etape [Features of improving the quality of life of the population of depressed territories at the present stage]. Transformatsiya protsessov upravleniya v usloviyakh realizatsii natsional’nykh tseley i strategicheskikh zadach razvitiya Rossii. Nizhniy Novgorod: Nauchno-izdatel’skiy tsentr “Otkrytoye znaniye”. P. 85–98.

17. Naidoo I., Holtzhausen N. (2020) Contextualising Public Value Theory and its Measurement in Public Administration. Administratio Publica. Vol. 28. Is. 2. P. 191–204.

18. Neshataev A.V. (2022) Subjective Assessments of the Conditions for the Development of Human Capital in Depressed Territories. Vestnik Adygeyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 1: Regionovedeniye: filosofiya, istoriya, sotsiologiya, yurisprudentsiya, politologiya, kul’turologiya. No. 3. P. 75–84. DOI: 10.53598/2410-3691-2022-3-304-75-84

19. Neshataev A.V. (2023) The Genesis of Scientific Concepts about Depressive Territories in Sociological Approaches. XXIII Ural’skiye sotsiologicheskiye chteniya. Lichnost’, kul’tura, obshchestvo: naslediye L.N. Kogana i sovremennost’. Ekaterinburg: UrFU.

20. Neshataev A.V., Bagirova A.P. (2021) Reproductive Orientations of the Population of a Depressive Territory: Factors and Prognosis. III Vserossiyskiy demograficheskiy forum s mezhdunarodnym uchastiyem. Moskva: FNISTs RAN. P. 67–71.

21. Nizhegorodtsev R.M., Berulava A.G. (2014) Depressive Nature of the Economic Dynamics of the Region and Ways to Overcome It. RISK: Resursy. Informatsiya. Snabzheniye. Konkurentsiya. No. 1. P. 167–170.

22. North D. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

23. Pomazkova E.V. (2022) Value Orientations and Motivations of Russian Entrepreneurship. Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul’tura. No. 8. P. 94–98. DOI: 10.24158/fik.2022.8.15

24. Prokopeva N.Yu. (2018) Marginality of the Urban Space of Small Cities. Vestnik Severo-Vostochnogo federal’nogo universiteta im. M.K. Ammosova. Seriya: Ekonomika. Sotsiologiya. Kul’turologiya. No. 3. P. 60–68.

25. Proudhon P.-J. (1998) La Guerre et la Paix. Moscow: Respublika.

26. Provorova A.A., Gubina O.V., Uhanova A.V., Smirennikova E.V., Voronina L.V., Matvienko I.I. (2022) Factors of Demographic Development of Russian Arctic Regions. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya. No. 5. P. 105–111. DOI: 10.17513/fr.43263

27. Savelyeva N.K., Sozinova A.A., Palkina M.V., Karaulov V.M. (2020) Assessment of the Innovative Development of Depressed Regions. Teoreticheskaya ekonomika. No. 11. P. 46–60.

28. Sen A. (1982) Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

29. Tagirova E.I. (2020) Criteria for Assigning Regions to Depressive Territories. Vestnik Altayskoy akademii ekonomiki i prava. No. 10-3. P. 309–313. DOI: 10.17513/vaael.1380

30. Tishchenko T.V. (2020) International Experience of Fiscal Support for Depressed Areas. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. No. 5. P. 151–166. DOI: 10.24411/2073-6487-2020-10063

31. Tönnies F. (2002) Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie. Moscow: Vladimir Dal’.

32. Toshchenko Zh. (2016) Sociologiya zhizni [Sociology of life] Moscow: YuNITI-DANA.

33. Tulaeva S.A., Nemirovskaya S.A. (2024) “Stop Spoiling Our Land”: Regional Identity and Environmental Mobilization in the Russian Regions. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noy antropologii. Vol. 27. No. 1. P. 216–246. DOI: 10.31119/jssa.2024.27.1.10

34. Ventriss C., Perry J.L., Nabatchi T., Milward H.B., Johnston J.M. (2019). Democracy, Public Administration, and Public Values in an Era of Estrangement. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance. Vol. 2. Is. 4. P. 275–282. DOI: 10.1093/ppmgov/gvz013

35. Veprikova E.B., Kislenok A.A. (2020) Approaches to the Defi of Territorial Backwardness in the Regional Development Management. Vlast’ i upravleniye na Vostoke Rossii. No. 4. P. 60–73. DOI: 10.22394/1818-4049-2020-93-4-60-73

36. Wallerstein I. (2006) World-Systems Analysis. An Introduction. Moscow: Izdatel’skiy dom “Territoriya budushchego”.

37. Weber M. (2006) Die protestantische Ethik und der «Geist» des Kapitalismus. Moscow: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya.

38. Zubarevich N.V. (2021) Possibility of Decentralisation during the Year of Pandemic: What Does the Analysis of Public Budgets Reveal? Regional’nye issledovaniya. No. 1. P. 46–57.