Russian Machine Tool Industry in the Context of Global Competition: Current State, Challenges and Development Prospects
https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-117-2026-60-75
Abstract
Ensuring economic security and technological sovereignty are inextricably linked, as both factors affect the state’s resilience to external challenges and threats. The article analyses the industry of production of means of production, namely, machine tool industry. The degree of development of this industry has a direct impact on the level of competitiveness of the economy of any country in the world. The events of 2022, related to the special military operation, became a turning point. They gave an impetus to the expansion of production capacities. The role of sanctions’ imposition on the Russian economy is clearly reflected in the dynamics of the volume of production of metalworking machines in physical terms. In 2023, the growth in the production of machine tools amounted to 24,7%. However, it is mostly provided by increasing the production of basic machinery. During the analysis of the foreign machine tool industry, the downward trend in European leaders in the production of machine tools is identified. It confirms the importance of research and development work in order to create modern domestic technologies to accelerate economic growth. The issue of strategizing the industrial core of the national economy plays an important role in the context of the problem under consideration. Nowadays, the Russian system is characterized by the imperfection of the applied methodology for the development and implementation of industrial development strategies. The OTSW-analysis of the machine tool industry in Russia, which focuses on the initial identification of opportunities and threats, is proposed in the article. It allowed identifying a promising direction of the domestic industry development, related to ensuring domestic demand for machine tools thanks to the innovation activity growth and achievement of Russian Federation technological sovereignty. General and specific methods were used during the study. Common methods include comparative analysis, modelling, correlation analysis, as well as analysis of regulatory legal acts and statistical data. The OTSW-analysis of the Russian machine tool industry was used as a specific method.
About the Author
Z. V. KhidirovRussian Federation
Zurab V. Khidirov, Postgraduate student
Moscow
References
1. Afanasev A.A. (2023) Comparative Analysis of the Importance of Domestic Machine-Tool Construction in the Modernization of Production Facilities of the USSR, the post-Soviet Period and at the Present Stage of Development of Russia. Ekonomika, predprinimatel’stvo i pravo. Vol. 13. No. 7. P. 2167–2188. DOI: 10.18334/epp.13.7.117948
2. Cernicky J. (2023) «Local for Local» Is Not a Solution, But a Symptom. Konrad Adenauer Stiftung. No. 139. Available at: https://www.kas.de/en/in-short/detail/-/content/local-for-local-ist-keine-loesung-sondernein-symptom
3. Chernyaev E.V., Khaitbaev V.A. (2024) Assessment of the Regulatory Framework for the Restoration Strategy of the Russian Machine Tool Building Industry. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika. No. 65. P. 153–170. DOI: 10.17223/19988648/65/9
4. Cooper J. (2024) The Machine Tool Industry of Russia at a Time of War and Sanctions. Post-Communist Economies. Vol. 36. Is. 5. P. 527–561. DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2024.2325787
5. Dementiev V.E., Elenev K.S., Kudryashov S.A. (2024) Organizational and Economic Factors of the Development of the Russian Machine Tool Industry. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii. No. 4. P. 46–60. DOI: 10.33293/1609-1442-2024-4(107)-46-60
6. Glazunova V.V., Sukharev O.S. (2024). Models of Technological Development: The Influence of Investment Structure. Journal of New Economy. Vol. 25. No. 4. P. 6–23. DOI: 10.29141/2658-5081-2024-25-4-1
7. Kaarlelaa T., Outeiro J. (2025) A Cyber-Physical Machine Tool Concept for Education and Workforce Training in CNC Machining. Manufacturing Letters. Vol. 44. P. 1209–1218. DOI: 10.1016/j.mfglet.2025.06.140
8. Kolesnikov R.Yu. (2024) Tools for Stimulating the Innovative Development of the Russian Machine Tool Industry. Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta prosveshcheniya. Seriya: Ekonomika. No. 1. P. 76–83. DOI: 10.18384/2949-5024-2024-1-76-83
9. Kvint V.L. (2015) Development of Strategy: Scanning and Forecasting of External and Internal Environments. Upravlencheskoye konsul’tirovaniye. No. 7(79). P. 6–11.
10. Kvint V.L. (2016) Strategy for the Global Market: Theory and Practical Applications. New York: Routledge.
11. Kvint V.L., Novikova I.V., Alimuradov M.K. (2021) Alignment of Global and National Interest with Regional Strategic Priorities. Ekonomika i upravlenie. Vol. 27. No. 11. P. 900–909. DOI: 10.35854/1998-1627-2021-11-900-909
12. Liu Ch., Xu X. (2017) Cyber-Physical Machine Tool — the Era of Machine Tool 4.0. Procedia CIRP. Vol. 63. P. 70–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.078
13. Mahamatova S. T. (2023) Import Substitution and National Projects as Incentives for the Development of the Russian Economy under the Conditions of Economic Sanctions. Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 35–40. DOI: 10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-1-35-40
14. Novikova I.V., Boiko K.V., Dudovtseva I.V., Ovchinnikov V.A. (2020) Strategic Priorities of
15. Maintaining Decent Life in Kuzbass. Ekonomika promyshlennosti. Vol. 13. No. 3. P. 308–317. DOI: 10.17073/2072-1633-2020-3-308-317
16. Rozanova L.I. (2025) Otraslevyye strukturnyye sdvigi pod vozdeystviyem sanktsiy i tekhnologicheskikh vyzovov [Sectoral structural shifts under the influence of sanctions and technological challenges]. Uchenyye zapiski Krymskogo federal’nogo universiteta imeni V.I. Vernadskogo. Ekonomika i upravleniye. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 70–77.
17. Sasaev N.I., Kvint V.L. (2024) Strategizing the Industrial Core of the National Economy. Ekonomika promyshlennosti. Vol. 17. No. 3. P. 245–260. DOI: 10.17073/2072-1633-2024-3-1349
18. Schwab K. (2016) The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum. Shaan G. (2024) Economic Impact of United States Presidential Election Years: A Comparative AnalysIs. Research Archive of Rising Scholars (preprint). DOI: 10.58445/rars.1666
Review
For citations:
Khidirov Z.V. Russian Machine Tool Industry in the Context of Global Competition: Current State, Challenges and Development Prospects. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2026;1(117):60-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-117-2026-60-75
JATS XML













