From Information to Interaction: Comprehensive Understanding of the Public Authorities Openness

In modern world, characterized by increased demands on public administration due to globalization and greater interaction with society as a result of the growing capabilities of information and communication technologies, the issue of openness in public authorities has become one of the key issues in their activities. However, there is no single, universally accepted approach to this issue in the scientific literature. A number of researchers reduce the concept of openness to simple access to information, i.e. to information openness. Opposing them, another part of the scientific community notes the need to separate information openness and openness in general, justifying their differences as the relationship between the part and the whole. In this regard, the conceptualization of the concept of openness beyond information openness remains outside the focus of researchers. To this end, the article attempts to provide a comprehensive description of the phenomenon of openness by defining and substantiating the concept of political openness, which goes beyond simple information practices and covers the broader area of interaction between the authorities and civil society with a view to involving the latter in the decision-making process. The article identifies the content of political openness and outlines its main elements. In addition, attention is paid to the relationship between the openness of public authorities and the trust placed in them by citizens. On this basis, the complexity and multifaceted nature of the openness of public authorities is noted, and the advisability of further scientific research on the conceptualization of the main elements of openness in their interrelation with such related concepts as publicity, accessibility and transparency is indicated.

1. Ariansyah K., Muttaqin M., Pusvita V., Takariani C.S.D., Darmanto D., Budhirianto S., Nuryana M. (2025) Revisiting E-Government and Public Trust Relationship: Does Higher Maturity of E-Government Promote Greater Trust in Public Officials? Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. DOI: 10.1108/TG-07–2025–0219

2. Bugaric B. (2004) Openness and Transparency in Public Administration: Challenges for Public Law. Wisconsin International Law Journal. Vol. 22. P. 483–521.

3. Damm I.A., Akunchenko Е.А., Shchedrin N.V. (2019) Openness of Public Authority: Issues of the Conceptual and Categorical Framework. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo. Vol. 10. No. 2. P. 226–242. DOI: 10.21638/spbu14.2019.203

4. Fedoseev I.V., Vasiliev A.N. (2022) State Strategic Planning and Openness of the State. Izvestiya SPbG·EU. No. 5–1(137). P. 47–54.

5. Fedozzi L., Furtado A., Rangel R. (2019) Participatory Budgeting in Brazil: Elements for a Brief Evaluation.

6. Hope for democracy. 30 Years of Participatory Budgeting Worldwide. Faro: Oficina. P. 105–121.

7. Galindo-Silva H. (2021) Political Openness and Armed Conflict: Evidence from Local Councils in Colombia.

8. European Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 67. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101984

9. Kononenko P.B. (2015) Transparency of Russian Parliaments: Experimental Research. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 4: Istoriya. Regionovedeniye. Mezhdunarodn·yye otnosheniya. No. 1(31). P. 99–109. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu4.2015.1.10

10. Korchenkova N.Y. (2000) Printsip informatsionnoy otkrytosti kak trebovaniye sovremennoy demokratii [The principle of information openness as a requirement of modern democracy]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Pravo. No. 1. P. 124–128.

11. Kosaretskiy S.N. (2010) Informatsionnaya otkrytost’ saytov zakonodatel’nykh organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti sub”yektov RF [Information openness of the websites of legislative bodies of state power of the subjects of the Russian Federation]. Srednerusskiy vestnik obshchestvennykh nauk. No. 2(15). P. 57–61.

12. Kuzmin A. V. (2018) Bases of Ensuring Openness in Activity of Public Authorities in the Russian Federation. Uchenyye zapiski Tambovskogo otdeleniya RoSMU. No. 9. P. 188–197.

13. Matheus R., Faber R., Ismagilova E., Janssen M. (2023) Digital Transparency and the Usefulness for Open Government. International Journal of Information Management. Vol. 73. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102690

14. Murtazaliev А.М., Ragimkhanova К.Т. (2024) Information Openness of Public Authorities: Prospects and Improvement of Legislation Development. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i kadry. No. 1. P. 89–91. DOI: 10.24412/2312–0444–2024–1-89–91

15. Nikitina А.S., Zerchaninova Т.Е. (2023) Information Openness of the State in the Context of Digital Transformation: А Sociological Analysis. Vlast’. Vol. 31. No. 1. P. 148–156.

16. Pugachev А.N. (2022) The Experience of Studying the Openness of Regional Parliamentarism Institution in Russia. Regional’nyye issledovaniya. No. 2(76). P. 90–105. DOI: 10.5922/1994–5280–2022–2-8

17. Rodrigues J.G. (2022) Publicity, Transparency, and Openness in Public Administration. Revista de Derecho. Vol. 58. P. 9–37. DOI: 10.14482/dere.58.004.223

18. Schmidthuber L., Ingrams A., Hilgers D. (2021) Government Openness and Public Trust: The Mediating Role of Democratic Capacity. Public Administration Review. Vol. 81. Is. 1. P. 91–109. DOI: 10.1111/puar.13298

19. Strakhov K. A., Pugachev А.N. (2023) Parlament na ladoni. Reyting otkrytosti parlamentov rossiyskikh regionov. Issledovaniye tret’ye [Parliament in the palm of your hand: Ranking the openness of regional parliaments in Russia. Third Study]. Saint Petersburg.: Fond razvitiya gorodskogo samoupravleniya “1870”.