Formation and Development of Project Teams in Intersectoral Social Partnership in Russia

In today’s socioeconomic development, public demand for spiritual and moral values and intersectoral social partnerships (ISP) is emerging, which in turn is creating new demands on the higher education system. Building on interactions between the university and social partners from the public, business, and nonprofit sectors, the Service-Learning program fosters the creation of a special type of a team that requires scientific understanding. This article, using the example of the Kazan State Power Engineering University (Tatarstan), describes and analyzes the practice of forming and developing project teams participating in the Service-Learning project, highlighting team effects. The choice of the research object is based, firstly, on the maturity of civil society in the Republic of Tatarstan, secondly, on the development of intersectoral partnerships between the state, business, and nonprofits in the republic, and the officially recognized successful implementation of the Service-Learning program. The study’s methodological framework was based on the concept of methodological pluralism, and the primary method was the author’s participant observation of the organization, implementation, and synthesis of team experiences in the lifecycle practices of service-learning projects in ISPs (more than 50 teams, 180 people). A secondary analysis of the results of a team retrospective, supplemented by a questionnaire, was used to identify team effects. As a result, it is concluded that intersectoral project teams in the service-learning approach are dynamic, cross-functional, and have distributed leadership. The approach itself makes a significant contribution to the development of civic awareness, professional competencies that meet labour market demands, and the development of the university’s third mission.

1. Antonova N. (2021) Komandnyy menedzhment v epokhu peremen. Kak komandn·yye effekty sposobstvuyut ustoychivosti i razvitiyu biznesa [Team management in an era of change: How team effects contribute to business resilience and growth]. Menedzhment segodnya. No. 1. P. 42–47. DOI: 10.36627/2304–6473–2021–1-1–42–47

2. Backhaus-Maul H., Roth C. (2013) Service Learning an Hochschulen in Deutschland. Ein erster empirischer Beitrag zur Vermessung eines jungen Phänomens. Wiesbaden: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978- 3–658–00124–7

3. Bobyleva N.I., Popolitova O.V. (2020) The Team Approach as a New Format for Continuous Professional Development of Managers in the Field of Education. Obrazovatel’naya panorama. No. 1(13). P. 57–63.

4. Burlakova YU.V. (2016) Osobennosti ispol’zovaniya komandnogo menedzhmenta na predpriyatiyakh RZHD [Peculiarities of using team management at Russian Railways enterprises]. Molodoy uchenyy. No. 12(116). P. 1150–1151.

5. Dolgov M.V. (2020) Team Management as the 21st Century Management Style. Lichnost’: resursy i potentsial. No. 1(5). P. 38–45.

6. Folgueiras P., Aramburuzabala P., Opazo H., Mugarra A., Ruiz A. (2020) Service-Learning: A Survey of Experiences in Spain. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice. Vol. 15 Is. 2. P. 162–180. DOI: 10.1177/1746197918803857

7. Fomin A.A., Kul’kova V.YU., Agapov O.D., Gil’meyeva R.KH., Safina Z.N., Leont’yeva T.I., Tuzikov A.R., Belyakov R. YU., Gafiyatullin M.M., Gimadutdinov A.F., Safin T.F. (2019) Grazhdanskoye obshchestvo v Respublike Tatarstan: potentsial i tochki rosta [Civil society in the Republic of Tatarstan: Potential and growth points]. Kazan’: Poznaniye.

8. Galkina A.D., Nikolskiy V.S. (2024) “Cultivating a Sense of Duty and Responsibility to Society”: The Specificity of the “Service-Learning” Approach in China. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii. Vol. 33. No. 3. P. 141–161. DOI: 10.31992/0869–3617–2024–33–3-141–161

9. Grigor’yeva N.S., Kolesnikov S.I., Chubarova T.V. (eds.) (2021) Palliativnaya pomoshch’ kak sfera mezhdistsiplinarnogo vzaimodeystviya: ot teorii k praktike [Palliative care as a field of interdisciplinary interaction: From theory to practice]. Moscow: LENAND.

10. Grove A.S. (1996) High Output Management. Moscow: Informatsionno-izdatel’skiy dom “Filin”.

11. Kulkova V.Yu. (2025) Implementation of the Federal Program “Service Learning” in Project-Based Learning: Results Evaluation. Ekonomicheskaya sreda. Vol. 14. No. 2. P. 45–51. DOI: 10.22394/ee252.45–51

12. Makarenko A.S. (2024) Pedagogicheskaya poema [Pedagogical poem]. Moscow: АSТ.

13. Miroshnikova E.A., Yezhkov A.P. (2023) Transformation of Management Team in the Public Service in Conditions of Project Management. Vestnik ekspertnogo soveta. No. 1(32). P. 17–23.

14. Morozov V.V. (2007) Vospitatel’naya Pedagogika Antona Mararenko. Opyt preyemstvennosti. [Anton Makarenko’s educational pedagogy: A continuity experience]. Yegor’yevsk: YEF MGGU im. M.A. Sholokhova.

15. Mouton J., Wildschut L. (2005) Service Learning in South Africa: Lessons Learnt through Systematic Evaluation. Acta Academica. Vol. 2005. Is. 3. Р. 116–150.

16. Salamon L. (2002) The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.

17. Salamon L. (2014) New Frontiers of Philanthropy. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.

18. Solov’yev A.I. (ed.) (2018) Grazhdanskiy sektor gosudarstvennogo upravleniya [Civil sector of public administration]. Moscow: ARGAMAK-MEDIA.

19. Thomson A.M., Smith-Tolken A.R., Naidoo A.V., Bringle R.G. (2011) Service Learning and Community Engagement: A Comparison of Three National Contexts. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. Vol. 22. Is. 2. Р. 214–237.

20. Vol’fson B. (2014) Gibkoye upravleniye proyektami i produktami [Flexible project and product management]. Saint Petersburg: Piter.