Preview

Public Administration. E-journal (Russia)

Advanced search

Consequences of Broad Deployment of Artificial Intelligence Systems in Public Administration: The USA Experience

https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-116-2026-74-84

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the consequences of large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) systems integration in the public administration system of the United States of America. The relevance of the topic is determined by the rapid institutionalization of AI in the administrative and defense structures of the U.S. federal government, which creates precedents and models that are significant for the global practice of public administration. The object of the study is the U.S. public administration system, and the subject is the organizational, regulatory, and strategic consequences of the integration of generative AI systems (GPT, Gemini, Grok, and Claude models) into the activities of federal agencies and defense structures. The aim of the study is to identify the key consequences, opportunities, and risks associated with the integration of AI systems into the practice of U.S. public administration in 2023–2026, as well as to assess the institutional and regulatory mechanisms for regulating this process. The study uses comparative analysis, content analysis of regulatory and strategic documents, and the case study method. The results show that Trump administration is pursuing a policy of accelerated deregulation and commercialization of AI infrastructure in the public sector, which creates a number of systemic contradictions: between the requirements of security and the pace of implementation, between the corporate interests of developers and the objectives of public administration, and between the desire for technological leadership and the need for international legal regulation. The study identifies the phenomenon of “algorithmic path dependence”, where the choice of a specific commercial AI platform establishes the information priorities and values of private corporations in the practice of public administration. The novelty of the study lies in the comprehensive examination of the administrative, defense, and international legal aspects of the use of generative AI in the context of the radical reform of U.S. public administration, which fills a gap in the Russian-language scientific literature.

About the Author

S. N. Grinyaev
Institute of Europe, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Sergey N. Grinyaev, DSc (Technical Sciences)

Moscow



References

1. Alekseeva M.V. (2025) The Digital Transformation of Public Administration Based on Artificial Intelligence. Administrativnoye pravo i protsess. No. 12. P. 16–19. DOI: 10.18572/2071-1166-2025-12-16-19

2. Bovens M. (2007) Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal. Vol. 13. Is. 4. P. 447–468. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x

3. Grinyaev S.N. (2025) Value Orientations and Public Service in the Context of New Challenges and Threats. Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye. Elektronnyy vestnik. No. 108. P. 90–100. DOI: 10.55959/MSU2070-1381-108-2025-90-100

4. Henman P. (2020) Improving Public Services Using Artificial Intelligence: Possibilities, Pitfalls, Governance. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration. Vol. 42. Is. 4. P. 209–221. DOI: 10.1080/23276665.2020.1816188

5. Katanandov S.L., Kovalev A.A. (2023) Technological Development of Modern States: Artificial Intelligence in Public Administration. Gosudarstvennoye i munitsipal’noye upravleniye. Uchenyye zapiski. No. 1. P. 174–182. DOI: 10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-1-174-182

6. Kuznechenko I.M. (2023) Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Public Administration: Analysis of the Theory and Selection of Russian Scientific Communities. Informatsionnoye obshchestvo. No. 4. P. 127–146. DOI: 10.52605/16059921_2023_04_127

7. Lawrence С., Cui I., Ho D. (2023) The Bureaucratic Challenge to AI Governance: An Empirical Assessment of Implementation at U.S. Federal Agencies. Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES’23). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. P. 606–652. DOI: 10.1145/3600211.3604701

8. Mergel I., Edelmann N., Haug N. (2019) Defining Digital Transformation: Results from Expert Interviews. Government Information Quarterly. Vol. 36. Is. 4. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002

9. Rawal A., Johnson K., Mitchell C., Walton M., Nwankwo D. (2025) Responsible Artificial Intelligence (RAI) in U.S. Federal Government: Principles, Policies, and Practices. Arxiv. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2502.03470

10. Sun T., Medaglia R. (2019) Mapping the Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector: Evidence from Public Healthcare. Government Information Quarterly. Vol. 36. Is. 2. P. 368–383. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008

11. Wirtz B. Weyerer J., Geyer C. (2018) Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector — Applications and Challenges. International Journal of Public Administration. Vol. 42. Is. 7. P. 596–615. DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103


Review

For citations:


Grinyaev S.N. Consequences of Broad Deployment of Artificial Intelligence Systems in Public Administration: The USA Experience. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2026;(116):74-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-116-2026-74-84

Views: 14

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2070-1381 (Online)