Preview

Public Administration. E-journal (Russia)

Advanced search

Sociocultural Aspects of Corrupt Behavior. The Experience of China

https://doi.org/10.24412/2070-1381-2023-98-178-190

Abstract

The processes of economic liberalization and democratization have presented emerging nations with a wide range of complicated issues, the resolution of which proved to be extremely challenging due to the specifics of their socio-cultural context. One of these issues is corruption, whose great prevalence hampers the establishment and consolidation of a modern system of public administration in these countries. It has been demonstrated through experience that corruption perception in developed countries affect acceptable behavior patterns in developing countries, making it difficult to detect corruption and create effective anti-corruption measures. The article examines how sociocultural factors influence the perception of corruption with the example of the experience of modern China. In particular, various types of guanxi relations, which have been the basis of social interaction in China for many centuries, are being explored. But since the beginning of economic reform and the reorganization of the legal system, they have become ambiguous, since their content has much in common with the Western understanding of corrupt behavior, shared throughout the world, including in China. The authors come to the conclusion that it is extremely difficult to legally limit guanxi, since they are part of the cultural environment, and this allows us to attribute guanxi to “white corruption”. At the same time, situations in which guanxi relations are used as a cover for corrupt deals must be stopped. This requires not so much tough administrative measures but strengthening the value in the minds of citizens and civil servants of an orientation towards achieving national, non-group or individual interests.

About the Authors

O. V. Mikhaylova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Olga V. Mikhaylova, DSc (Political Sciences), Associate Professor, School of Public Administration

Moscow, Russian Federation



Shao Zixuan
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Shao Zixuan, Postgraduate student, Higher School of Cultural Policy and Management in the Humanitarian Sphere (Faculty)

Moscow, Russian Federation



References

1. Fukuyama F. (2004) Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Moscow: AST.

2. Gold T. (1985) After Comradeship: Personal Relations in China since the Cultural Revolution. The China Quarterly. Vol. 104. P. 657–675.

3. Gupta A. (1995) Blurred Boundaries: The Discourse of Corruption, the Culture of Politics, and the Imagined State. American Ethnologist. Vol. 22. Is. 2. P. 375–402. DOI: 10.1525/ae.1995.22.2.02a00090

4. Heidenheimer A.J. (2002) Parties, Campaign Finance and Political Corruption: Tracing Long-Term Comparative Dynamics. In: Johnston M. (ed.) Political Corruption: Concepts and Contexts. New York: Routledge. P. 761–776.

5. Jetter M., Agudelo A., Hassan A. (2015) The Effect on Democracy on Corruption: Income is Key. World Development. Vol. 74. P. 286–304. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.016

6. Ledeneva A. (2008) Blat and Guanxi: Informal Practices in Russia and China. Comparative Studies in Society and History. Vol. 50. Is 1. P. 118–144.

7. Li L. (2011) Performing Bribery in China: Guanxi-practice, Corruption with Human Face. Journal of Contemporary China. Vol. 20. Is. 68. P. 1-20. DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2011.520841

8. Luo Y. (1997) Guanxi and Performance of Foreign-Invested Enterprise in China. An Empirical Enquiry. Management International Review. Vol. 37. Is. 1. P. 51–70.

9. LuoY. (2002) Corruption and Organization in Asian Management System. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Vol. 19. P. 405–422. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016252021370

10. Persson A., Rothstein D., Teorello J. (2013) Why Anticorruption Reforms Fail: Systemic Corruption as a Collective Action Problem. Governance. Vol. 26. Is. 3. P. 449–471. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01604.x

11. Treisman D. (2000) The Cause of Corruption: A Cross-National Study. Journal of Public Economics. Vol. 76. Is. 3. P. 399–457.

12. Tsang E. (1998) Can Guanxi be a Source of Sustained Competitive advantage for Business in China? Academy of Management Executive. Vol. 12. Is. 2. P. 64–73.

13. Weyland K. (1998) The Politics of Corruption in Latin America. Journal of Democracy. Vol. 9. Is. 2. P. 108–121.

14. Yang M. (1989) The Gift Economy and State Power in China. Comparative Studies in Society and History. Vol. 31. Is. 1. P. 25–54.

15. Yang M. (1994) Gifts, Favors, and Banquets: The Art of Social Relations in China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

16. Yu O. (2008) Corruption in China’s Economic Reform: A Review of Recent Observations and Explanations. Crime, Law and Social Change. Vol. 50. P. 161–176. DOI: 10.1007/s10611-008-9133-5

17. Zhan J. (2012) Filling the Gap of Formal Institutions: The Effects of Guanxi Network on Corruption in Reform-Era China. Crime, Law and Social Change. Vol. 58. Is. 2. P. 93–102. DOI: 10.1007/s10611-012-9379-9

18. 94–99 (Bian Y. (2019) Gifts, Favors and Banquets: The Art of Social Relationships in China. Open Times. No. 3. P. 94–99).

19. 24–27 (Wang Sh., Li X. (2021) The Basis of Trust: A Rational Explanation. Sociological Study. No. 3. P. 24–27).

20. (Gregory C. (2019) Gifts and Commodities. Yunnan: Yunnan University Press).

21. (Parsons T. (2022) The Structure of Social Action. Nanjing: Yilin Press).

22. 55–56 (Peng S. (2019) The Establishment Mechanism of Trust: Relationship Operation and Legal Means. Sociological Study. No. 2. P. 55–56).

23. (4). Available: https://www.docin.com/p-1581096689.html (Smart А. (2007) Gifts, Bribes, and Guanxi: A Reconsideration of Bourdieu’s Social Capital. China Agricultural University Journal of Social Sciences Edition. Vol. 24. No. 4).

24. 20–30 (Sun L. (2017) Relationships, Social Relations and Social Structure. Sociological Study. No. 5. Р. 20–30).

25. (Fei X. (2022) From the Soil — the Foundations of Chinese Society. Tianjin: Tianjin People’s Publishing House).

26. (Jin Y. (2017) China Society and Politics. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press).

27. (Yang M. (2022) Gifts, Favors, and Banquets: The Art of Social Relationships in China. Suzhou: Jiangsu People’s Publishing House).

28. (Yan Y. (2021) The Flow of Gifts Reciprocity and Social Network in A Chinese Village. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House).


Review

For citations:


Mikhaylova O.V., Zixuan Sh. Sociocultural Aspects of Corrupt Behavior. The Experience of China. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2023;(98):178-190. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2070-1381-2023-98-178-190

Views: 30

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2070-1381 (Online)