<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">gosupr</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Государственное управление. Электронный вестник</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Public Administration. E-journal (Russia)</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2070-1381</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Факультет государственного управления МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24412/2070-1381-2023-98-178-190</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">gosupr-286</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СОЦИОЛОГИЯ УПРАВЛЕНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>MANAGEMENT SOCIOLOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Социально-культурные аспекты коррупционного поведения. Опыт Китая</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Sociocultural Aspects of Corrupt Behavior. The Experience of China</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7394-8332</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Михайлова</surname><given-names>О. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Mikhaylova</surname><given-names>O. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Михайлова Ольга Владимировна, доктор политических наук, доцент, факультет государственного управления</p><p>Москва, РФ</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Olga V. Mikhaylova, DSc (Political Sciences), Associate Professor, School of Public Administration</p><p>Moscow, Russian Federation</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">Mikhaylova@spa.msu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Цзысюань</surname><given-names>Шао</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Zixuan</surname><given-names>Shao</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Шао  Цзысюань, аспирант, Высшая школа культурной политики и управления в гуманитарной сфере (факультет)</p><p>Москва, РФ</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Shao Zixuan, Postgraduate student, Higher School of Cultural Policy and Management in the Humanitarian Sphere (Faculty)</p><p>Moscow, Russian Federation</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">619543842q@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2023</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>31</day><month>05</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>98</issue><fpage>178</fpage><lpage>190</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Михайлова О.В., Цзысюань Ш., 2026</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Михайлова О.В., Цзысюань Ш.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Mikhaylova O.V., Zixuan S.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.spajournal.ru/jour/article/view/286">https://www.spajournal.ru/jour/article/view/286</self-uri><abstract><p>Процессы либерализации экономики и демократизации поставили перед развивающимися странами большое количество сложных проблем, преодоление которых оказалось серьезно затруднено в силу специфики их социально-культурного контекста. Одна из таких проблем — коррупция, высокий уровень которой препятствует установлению и закреплению современной системы государственного управления в этих странах. Практика продемонстрировала, что понимание коррупции в развитых странах затрагивает приемлемые модели поведения в развивающихся странах, что затрудняет ее идентификацию и выработку адекватных антикоррупционных мер. В статье на примере опыта Китая рассматривается влияние социокультурных факторов на восприятие коррупции. В частности, исследуются различные оценки отношений гуаньси, которые являются основой социального взаимодействия в Китае на протяжении многих веков, но с момента началареформирования экономики и переустройства правовой системы они стали носить двусмысленный характер, так как их содержание имеет много общего с западным пониманием коррупционного поведения, разделяемым во всем мире, в том числе и в Китае. Авторы приходят к выводу, что законодательно ограничить эти отношения крайне сложно, так как они являются частью культурной среды, что позволяет относить гуаньси к «белой коррупции». В то же время необходимо пресечь ситуации, в которых отношения гуаньси используются в качестве прикрытия для коррупционных сделок. Это требует не столько жестких административных мер, сколько усиления значения в сознании граждан и государственных служащих ценностной ориентации на достижение общенациональных, а не групповых или индивидуальных интересов.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The processes of economic liberalization and democratization have presented emerging nations with a wide range of complicated issues, the resolution of which proved to be extremely challenging due to the specifics of their socio-cultural context. One of these issues is corruption, whose great prevalence hampers the establishment and consolidation of a modern system of public administration in these countries. It has been demonstrated through experience that corruption perception in developed countries affect acceptable behavior patterns in developing countries, making it difficult to detect corruption and create effective anti-corruption measures. The article examines how sociocultural factors influence the perception of corruption with the example of the experience of modern China. In particular, various types of guanxi relations, which have been the basis of social interaction in China for many centuries, are being explored. But since the beginning of economic reform and the reorganization of the legal system, they have become ambiguous, since their content has much in common with the Western understanding of corrupt behavior, shared throughout the world, including in China. The authors come to the conclusion that it is extremely difficult to legally limit guanxi, since they are part of the cultural environment, and this allows us to attribute guanxi to “white corruption”. At the same time, situations in which guanxi relations are used as a cover for corrupt deals must be stopped. This requires not so much tough administrative measures but strengthening the value in the minds of citizens and civil servants of an orientation towards achieving national, non-group or individual interests.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Коррупция</kwd><kwd>гуаньси</kwd><kwd>«белая коррупция»</kwd><kwd>развивающиеся страны</kwd><kwd>Китай</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Corruption</kwd><kwd>guanxi</kwd><kwd>“white corruption”</kwd><kwd>developing countries</kwd><kwd>China</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фукуяма Ф. Доверие: социальные добродетели и путь к процветанию. М.: АСТ, 2004.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fukuyama F. (2004) Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Moscow: AST.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gold T. After Comradeship: Personal Relations in China since the Cultural Revolution // The China Quarterly. 1985. Vol. 104. P. 657–675.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gold T. (1985) After Comradeship: Personal Relations in China since the Cultural Revolution. The China Quarterly. Vol. 104. P. 657–675.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gupta A. Blurred Boundaries: The Discourse of Corruption, the Culture of Politics, and the Imagined State // American Ethnologist. 1995. Vol. 22. Is. 2. P. 375–402. DOI: 10.1525/ae.1995.22.2.02a00090</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gupta A. (1995) Blurred Boundaries: The Discourse of Corruption, the Culture of Politics, and the Imagined State. American Ethnologist. Vol. 22. Is. 2. P. 375–402. DOI: 10.1525/ae.1995.22.2.02a00090</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Heidenheimer A.J. Parties, Campaign Finance and Political Corruption: Tracing Long-Term Comparative Dynamics // Political Corruption: Concepts and Contexts / ed. by M. Johnston. New York: Routledge, 2002. P. 761–776.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Heidenheimer A.J. (2002) Parties, Campaign Finance and Political Corruption: Tracing Long-Term Comparative Dynamics. In: Johnston M. (ed.) Political Corruption: Concepts and Contexts. New York: Routledge. P. 761–776.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">JetterM., AgudeloA., HassanA. The Effect on Democracy on Corruption: Income is Key// World Development. 2015. Vol. 74. P. 286–304. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.016</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jetter M., Agudelo A., Hassan A. (2015) The Effect on Democracy on Corruption: Income is Key. World Development. Vol. 74. P. 286–304. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.016</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ledeneva A. Blat and Guanxi: Informal Practices in Russia and China // Comparative Studies in Society and History. 2008. Vol. 50. Is 1. P. 118–144.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ledeneva A. (2008) Blat and Guanxi: Informal Practices in Russia and China. Comparative Studies in Society and History. Vol. 50. Is 1. P. 118–144.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Li L. Performing Bribery in China: Guanxi-practice, Corruption with Human Face // Journal of Contemporary China. 2011. Vol. 20. Is. 68. P. 1–20. DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2011.520841</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Li L. (2011) Performing Bribery in China: Guanxi-practice, Corruption with Human Face. Journal of Contemporary China. Vol. 20. Is. 68. P. 1-20. DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2011.520841</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Luo Y. Guanxi and Performance of Foreign-Invested Enterprise in China. An Empirical Enquiry // Management International Review. 1997. Vol. 37. Is. 1. P. 51–70.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Luo Y. (1997) Guanxi and Performance of Foreign-Invested Enterprise in China. An Empirical Enquiry. Management International Review. Vol. 37. Is. 1. P. 51–70.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Luo Y. Corruption and Organization in Asian Management System // Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 2002. Vol. 19. P. 405–422. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016252021370</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">LuoY. (2002) Corruption and Organization in Asian Management System. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Vol. 19. P. 405–422. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016252021370</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Persson A., Rothstein D., Teorello J. Why Anticorruption Reforms Fail: Systemic Corruption as a Collective Action Problem // Governance. 2013. Vol. 26. Is. 3. P. 449–471. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01604.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Persson A., Rothstein D., Teorello J. (2013) Why Anticorruption Reforms Fail: Systemic Corruption as a Collective Action Problem. Governance. Vol. 26. Is. 3. P. 449–471. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01604.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Treisman D. The Cause of Corruption: A Cross-National Study // Journal of Public Economics. 2000. Vol. 76. Is. 3. P. 399–457.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Treisman D. (2000) The Cause of Corruption: A Cross-National Study. Journal of Public Economics. Vol. 76. Is. 3. P. 399–457.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tsang E. Can Guanxi be a Source of Sustained Competitive advantage for Business in China? // Academy of Management Executive. 1998. Vol. 12. Is. 2. P. 64–73.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tsang E. (1998) Can Guanxi be a Source of Sustained Competitive advantage for Business in China? Academy of Management Executive. Vol. 12. Is. 2. P. 64–73.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Weyland K. The Politics of Corruption in Latin America // Journal of Democracy. 1998. Vol. 9. Is. 2. P. 108–121.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Weyland K. (1998) The Politics of Corruption in Latin America. Journal of Democracy. Vol. 9. Is. 2. P. 108–121.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yang M. The Gift Economy and State Power in China // Comparative Studies in Society and History. 1989. Vol. 31. Is. 1. P. 25–54.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yang M. (1989) The Gift Economy and State Power in China. Comparative Studies in Society and History. Vol. 31. Is. 1. P. 25–54.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yang M. Gifts, Favors, and Banquets: The Art of Social Relations in China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yang M. (1994) Gifts, Favors, and Banquets: The Art of Social Relations in China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yu O. Corruption in China’s Economic Reform: A Review of Recent Observations and Explanations // Crime, Law and Social Change. 2008. Vol. 50. P. 161–176. DOI: 10.1007/s10611-008-9133-5</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yu O. (2008) Corruption in China’s Economic Reform: A Review of Recent Observations and Explanations. Crime, Law and Social Change. Vol. 50. P. 161–176. DOI: 10.1007/s10611-008-9133-5</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhan J. Filling the Gap of Formal Institutions: The Effects of Guanxi Network on Corruption in Reform-Era China // Crime, Law and Social Change. 2012. Vol. 58. Is. 2. P. 93–102. DOI: 10.1007/s10611-012-9379-9</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhan J. (2012) Filling the Gap of Formal Institutions: The Effects of Guanxi Network on Corruption in Reform-Era China. Crime, Law and Social Change. Vol. 58. Is. 2. P. 93–102. DOI: 10.1007/s10611-012-9379-9</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">3. 94–99. (Бянь Я. Гуаньси, капитал и застолья в городах Китая: теоретическая модель и эмпирический анализ // Открытые времена. 2019. № 3. С. 94–99).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">94–99 (Bian Y. (2019) Gifts, Favors and Banquets: The Art of Social Relationships in China. Open Times. No. 3. P. 94–99).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">3. 24–27. (Ван Ш., Лю С. Основа доверия: рациональное объяснение // Социологические исследования. 2021. № 3. С. 24–27. 2019. (ГрегориК. Подарки и товары. Юньнань: Издательство Юньнаньского университета, 2019).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">24–27 (Wang Sh., Li X. (2021) The Basis of Trust: A Rational Explanation. Sociological Study. No. 3. P. 24–27).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">(Парсонс Т. Структура социального действия. Нанкин: Илинь Пресс, 2022).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">(Gregory C. (2019) Gifts and Commodities. Yunnan: Yunnan University Press).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">2. 55–56 (Пэн С. Механизм установления доверия: функционирование отношений и средства верховенства права // Социологические исследования. 2019. № 2. С. 55–56).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">(Parsons T. (2022) The Structure of Social Action. Nanjing: Yilin Press).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">24(4). URL: https://www.docin.com/p-1581096689.html (Смарт А. Подарки, взятки и отношения: переосмысление капитала по Бурдье // Журнал Китайского сельскохозяйственного университета. 2007. Т. 24. № 4).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">55–56 (Peng S. (2019) The Establishment Mechanism of Trust: Relationship Operation and Legal Means. Sociological Study. No. 2. P. 55–56).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">5. 20–30 (Сунь Л. Гуаньси, cоциальные гуаньси и социальная структура // Социологические исследования. 2017. № 5. С. 20–30).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">(4). Available: https://www.docin.com/p-1581096689.html (Smart А. (2007) Gifts, Bribes, and Guanxi: A Reconsideration of Bourdieu’s Social Capital. China Agricultural University Journal of Social Sciences Edition. Vol. 24. No. 4).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">(Фэй С. Сельский Китай. Тяньцзинь: Тяньцзиньское народное издательство, 2022).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">20–30 (Sun L. (2017) Relationships, Social Relations and Social Structure. Sociological Study. No. 5. Р. 20–30).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">(Цзинь Я. Китайское общество и культура. Гонконг: Издательство Оксфордского университета, 2017).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">(Fei X. (2022) From the Soil — the Foundations of Chinese Society. Tianjin: Tianjin People’s Publishing House).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">(Ян М. Дары, отношения и государство: межличностные отношения и построение субъективности в Китае. Сучжоу: Народное издательство Цзянсу, 2022).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">(Jin Y. (2017) China Society and Politics. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">(Янь Ю. Поток подарков — принцип взаимности и социальные сети в китайской деревне. Шанхай: Шанхайский народный издательский дом, 2021).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">(Yang M. (2022) Gifts, Favors, and Banquets: The Art of Social Relationships in China. Suzhou: Jiangsu People’s Publishing House).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">(Yan Y. (2021) The Flow of Gifts Reciprocity and Social Network in A Chinese Village. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">(Yan Y. (2021) The Flow of Gifts Reciprocity and Social Network in A Chinese Village. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
