Preview

Public Administration. E-journal (Russia)

Advanced search

Accountability as an Object of Legal Assessment

https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-108-2025-138-147

Abstract

Accountability is the most important function of public administration, which involves the creation of sustainable and transparent rules in the interaction of government bodies and civil society. At the same time, the implementation of this function in the practice of municipal administration is not given due attention. This is manifested in the insufficient number of control parameters presented in the legislation and used to more fully ensure the responsibility of the authorities to the population. The aim of the article is to assess legal aspects of the accountability function at the municipal level. The stated aim involves solving a number of research problems, including identifying the main features of accountability, identifying the features of accountability at the municipal level, and formulating criteria for the implementation of this function. As research methods, comparative analysis was used, with the help of which a comparison of the accountability function at the state and local levels was carried out. The object of the study was the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of April 28, 2008 No. 607 «On the assessment of the effectiveness of the activities of local government bodies of municipalities, municipal, urban districts and municipal districts» and 131-FL «On the general principles of organizing local self-government in the Russian Federation». The main result of the study is the asymmetry in the implementation of the accountability function in the activities of state and municipal authorities, identified on the basis of the analysis of regulatory documents. This asymmetry is manifested in the obvious dominance of state parameters of accountability of local authorities compared to their responsibility to the population. Overcoming the asymmetry is possible by expanding the responsibility of local government to the population, establishing simple and transparent rules for maintaining document flow and reporting, as well as introducing new digital technologies.

About the Author

O. M. Roy
Institute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin
Russian Federation

Oleg M. Roy, DSc (Sociology), Leading researcher

Yekaterinburg



References

1. Ardigó I.A. (2019) Local Government Accountability Mechanisms. U4 Helpdesk Answer 2019:09. Available at: https://www.u4.no/publications/local-government-accountability-mechanisms.pdf

2. Artemenko E.A. (2023) Open Government Mechanisms as a Way to Increase Openness, Accountability and Anti-Corruption in Russia. Obshchestvo i ekonomika. No. 10. P. 64–77. DOI: 10.31857/S086904990023198-9

3. Arzhanov V.V., Pashenko S.B. (2021) Reporting of Local Government Bodies and Officials as One of the Elements of Building a Unified System of Public Power. Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii. No. 3(140). P. 72–80. DOI: 10.24412/2227-7315-2021-3-72-80

4. Keane J. (2009) The Life and Death of Democracy. London: Simon and Schuster.

5. Knyaginin D.K. (2008) K voprosu o ponyatii publichnoy podotchetnosti [On the concept of public accountability]. Konstitutsionnoye i munitsipal’noye pravo. No. 13. P. 9–14.

6. Merchant K.A., Otley D.T. (2006) A Review of the Literature on Control and Accountability. Handbooks of Management Accounting Research. Vol. 2. P. 785–802. DOI: 10.1016/S1751-3243(06)02013-X

7. Nisnevich Yu.A. (2013) Accountability and Control over the Activities of Public Authorities as the Bases for Fighting Corruption. Voprosy politologii. No. 1(9). P. 52–62.

8. Pelizzo R. (2021) Culture and Accountability. Public Administration and Civil Service. Vol. 4. Is. 79. P. 24–37. DOI: 10.52123/1994-2370-2021-558

9. Rakhmeeva I.I. (2020). Regulatory Impact Assessment as the Institutional Factor of the Development of Regional Socio-Economic System. Nauchnyye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii. No. 1. P. 218–235.

10. Romzek B.S., Dubnick M.J. (2018) Accountability. In: Shafritz J.M. (ed.) Defining Public Administration. Selections from the International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration. New York: Routledge. Р. 382–395.

11. Rudenko V.N. (2003) Direct Democracy: Models and Constitutional-Legal Institutions. Yekaterinburg: Ural’skoye otdeleniye RAN.

12. Synkova E.M. (2012) The Problem of Research Concepts of Accountability in a Constitutional and Administrative Law. Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. No. 1. P. 29-42.

13. Tsinchenko G.M., Pominov M.A. (2022) Fundamentals of Open Government Reforms. Upravlencheskoye konsul’tirovaniye. No. 5(161). P. 108–115. DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2022-5-108-115

14. Volkova O.N. (2015) Transparency, Accountability and Trust in Society. Voprosy ekonomiki. No. 2. P. 141–148. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2015-2-141-148


Review

For citations:


Roy O.M. Accountability as an Object of Legal Assessment. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2025;(108):138-147. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-108-2025-138-147

Views: 9

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2070-1381 (Online)