Preview

Public Administration. E-journal (Russia)

Advanced search

Strategic Planning at Federal Level: Main Elements and Structural and Logical Connections

https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-103-2024-102-114

Abstract

A significant problem of the organization of strategic planning is the lack of a unified methodology for the development of strategic planning documents. At the same time, coherence is not achieved between the accepted documents on targets, tasks, and time frames. The author supports the view that it is necessary to adopt a special normative document that removes these contradictions, and, as a contribution to its development, a number of methodological solutions are proposed, without which the development of a unified methodological approach seems problematic. The article summarizes the practice of federal strategic planning (25 current and 5 discontinued federal strategies are analyzed). It has been established that when developing federal strategies, a wide variety of approaches are used to establish consistency and interrelationships between the elements of strategies. The relationship between the elements is unclear or completely absent. In addition, the interpretations of different elements (goals, directions, priorities, tasks) often do not differ, and are also characterized by features not peculiar to these elements. As a result, the strategy turns into an enumeration of all possible common intentions with an indistinctly expressed, and therefore difficult to control end result. The adaptation of the mission concept from corporate strategic management to state management is considered appropriate. The essence of individual elements of the strategic plan is clarified, and their concepts that are absent in federal legislation (such as direction, priority) are formulated. A structural and logical scheme of the strategic plan is proposed, linking all the elements of the plan into a single system — from the mission to the tasks, as well as containing recommendations on the most appropriate placement of these elements in various types of strategic planning documents. The implementation of the proposed approach will help streamline the development and presentation of strategies, make the choice of strategic goals and directions more reasonable.

About the Author

R. N. Shpakova
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Raisa N. Shpakova PhD, Associate Professor

Moscow



References

1. Bordean I., Răileanu A., Turtureanu A.G. (2009) Strategic Planning in Public Administration. Proceedings of the Fifth “Administration and Public Management” International Conference: “Public Institutions’ Capacity to Implement the Administrative Reform Process”. Bucharest: Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services. No. 14. P. 141–153.

2. Buchwald E.M. (2022) Inresolved Issues of “Public Policy Framework for Strategic Planning”. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossijskoj akademii nauk. No. 1. P. 32–49. DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2022_1_32_49

3. Kozonogova E.V., Dubrovskaya YU.V., Rusinova M.R., Ivanov P.V. (2022) Assessment of Compliance of Strategic Development Priorities of Regions with their Industry Specialization based on Text Mining. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal’nogo upravleniya. No. 2. P. 106–133. DOI: 10.17323/1999-5431-2022-0-2-106-133

4. Lenchuk E.B. (2021) Strategic Planning as Tool of Acceleration of Socio-Economic Development of Russia. Saint Petersburg: INIR im. S.Yu. Vitte: Tsentrkatalog. P. 105–111.

5. Lenchuk E.B., Filatov V.I. (2023) Strategic Planning as a Tool for Reducing Uncertainty in Conditions of Global Economic Transformation. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossijskoj akademii nauk. No. 4. P. 7–24. DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2023_4_7_24

6. Miroslavskaya M.V., Kuchina A.O., Hajrutdinova L.I. (2018) Actual Issues of the Mission in the Strategic Management of Large Industrial Companies. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk. No. 10–2. P. 100–104. DOI: 10.24411/2500-1000-2018-10123

7. Semidocky V.A., Kutin M.V. (2010) Technology of Formation of the Purposes as an Element of the Mechanism of Strategic Planning in the Conditions of an Aggravation of Competitive Struggle. Vestnik Finansovoj Akademii. No. 5. P. 57–60.

8. Shpakova R.N. (2019) General Targets for Strategic Development Russian Federation Regions. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyj vestnik. No. 77. P. 311–336. DOI: 10.24411/2070-1381-2019-10030

9. Suhanova A.A. (2022) Constitutional Values in the Content of State Programs of the Russian Federation. Sibirskoe yuridicheskoe obozrenie. Vol. 19. No. 1. P. 39–53. DOI: 10.19073/2658-7602-2022-19-1-39-53

10. Lenchuk E.B., Voitolovskii F.G., Kuvalin D.B. (2020) Strategic Planning in Public Administration: Experience, Opportunities and Prospects. Studies on Russian Economic Development. Vol. 31. P. 621–628. DOI: 10.1134/S1075700720060106

11. Mishin Yu., Mishin A. (2021) Increasing the Level of Justification of State Strategic Planning. SHS Web of Conferences. Vol. 94. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20219401013

12. Nazarov I.I. (2022) Improving the System of Strategic Planning for National Development in the Russian Federation. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba. No. 6. P. 73–81. DOI: 10.22394/2070-8378-2022-24-6-73-81

13. Steiss A.W. (ed.) (2003) Strategic Management for Public and Nonprofit Organizations. New York: Routledge.


Review

For citations:


Shpakova R.N. Strategic Planning at Federal Level: Main Elements and Structural and Logical Connections. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2024;(103):102-114. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-103-2024-102-114

Views: 36

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2070-1381 (Online)