Assessing the Efficiency of Regional Practices of Governance Centralization in the Field of Urban Planning in Russia

The study is devoted to assessing the efficiency of governance centralization in the sphere of urban planning in Russia, expressed in the redistribution of municipal powers in favor of the authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The theoretical basis of the work is formed by key publications on the topic of urban planning, considered in the context of theories of public administration. It is shown that the redistribution of municipal powers in favor of the authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation can lead to an increase in the relative efficiency of state policy on the creation of new housing; at the same time, the limitations of using the presented methodology of data envelopment analysis when measuring the effectiveness of the exercise of powers are identified. At the same time, the duality of motivations of regional authorities to initiate the redistribution process is revealed: in a number of constituent entities of the Russian Federation, it was aimed at increasing the efficiency of the exercise of powers, while in other regions the redistribution itself was a consequence of achieving high efficiency. As a result, a thesis is formulated on the need to use quantitative metrics at the stage of formulating the composition of qualitative indicators in the framework of the introduction of full-fledged monitoring of law enforcement in the field of urban planning. In particular, the proposed methodology for assessing effectiveness can be used to select in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation that will participate in the pilot stage of monitoring. The presented work can thus serve as a basis for improving the system for assessing the efficiency and effectiveness of the government bodies and officials of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation activities in the field of urban planning, as well as contribute to the adjustment of inefficient practices of redistribution of powers in regions, associated primarily with the partial withdrawal of thematic powers from local authorities’ self-government.

1. Babeykin R.V. (2022) Legal Zoning: A Review of the US Experience in the Context of the Transformation of the Russian System of Urban Regulation. Gorodskie issledovaniya i praktiki. Vol. 7. No. 3. P. 91–115. DOI: 10.17323/usp73202291-115

2. Balaguer-Coll M.T., Prior D. (2009) Short- and Long-term Evaluation of Efficiency and Quality. An Application to Spanish Municipalities. Applied Economics. Vol. 41. Is. 23. P. 2991–3002. DOI: 10.1080/00036840701351923

3. Balaguer-Coll M.T., Prior D., Tortosa-Ausina E. (2013) Output Complexity, Environmental Conditions, and the Efficiency of Municipalities. Journal of Productivity Analysis. Vol. 39. Is. 3. P. 303–324. DOI: 10.1007/s11123-012-0307-x

4. Bandorin L.E. (2016) Reauthorization of Public Authorities of Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation and Local Authorities in the Field of Land Relations. Ekologicheskoe parvo. No. 6. P. 8–14.

5. Benito B., Bastida F., García J.A. (2010) The Determinants of Efficiency in Municipal Governments. Applied Economics. Vol. 42. Is. 4. P. 515–528. DOI: 10.1080/00036840701675560

6. Beregovskikh A.N. (2024) Proposals for Improving the Legal Regulation of Urban Planning and Land and Property Relations. Vestnik evraziyskoy nauki. Vol. 16. No. 2. Available at: https: //esj.today/PDF/59SAVN224.pdf

7. Blom-Hansen J., Houlberg K., Serritzlew S. (2021) Jurisdiction Size and Local Government Effectiveness: Assessing the Effects of Municipal Amalgamations on Performance. European Journal of Political Research. Vol. 60. Is. 1. P. 153–174. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12394

8. Çağlar D. (2021) The Turkish Cypriot Municipalities’ Productivity and Performance: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis and the Tobit Model. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. Vol. 14. Is. 9. DOI: 10.3390/jrfm14090407

9. Dobrolyubova E.I., Yuzhakov V.N., Starostina A.N. (2021) Otsenka kachestva gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: obosnovannost’, rezul’tativnost’, effektivnost’ [Assessing the quality of public administration: Validity, effectiveness, efficiency]. Moscow: Delo RANKhiGS.

10. Ezhukova O.A. (2020) On the Evaluation of the Efficiency of Public Authorities in New Constitutional Law and Socioeconomic Conditions. Konstitutsionnoye i munitsipal’noye pravo. No. 7. P. 7–12. DOI: 10.18572/1812-3767-2020-7-7-12

11. Faguet J.-P. (2021) Understanding Decentralization Theory, Evidence and Method, with a Focus on Least-developed Countries. Working Paper Series. No. 21–203. Available at: https: //www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/251596/1/1744149798.pdf

12. Gallent N., de Magalhaes C., Trigo S.F. (2021) Is Zoning the Solution to the UK Housing Crisis? Planning Practice & Research. Vol. 36. Is. 1. P. 1-19. DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2020.1829283

13. Garcia-Sanchez I.M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros B., Frias-Aceituno J. (2013) Determinants of Government Effectiveness. International Journal of Public Administration. Vol. 36. Is. 8. P. 567–577. DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2013.772630

14. Gisselquist R.M. (2012) Good Governance as a Concept, and Why This Matters for Development Policy. WIDER Working Paper 2012/030. Available at: https: //www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/81039/1/688432662.pdf

15. Gudz T.V., Babeykin R.V., Samolovskikh N.V. (2024) Trends in the Redistribution of Municipal Powers in the Field of Urban Planning. Zakon. No. 2. P. 184–195. DOI: 10.37239/0869-4400-2024-21-2-184-195

16. Gudz T.V., Karaselnikova I.V., Kosolapov N.A. (2020) Pravovoe zonirovanie. Regulirovanie gorodskoj zastrojki. Opyt Permi [Legal zoning. Regulation of urban development. Perm experience]. Moscow: Izdatel’skiy dom NIU VShE. DOI: 10.17323/978-5-7598-2300-1

17. Hager C. (2012) Revisiting the Ungovernability Debate: Regional Governance and Sprawl in the USA and UK. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. Vol. 36. Is. 4. P. 817–830. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.01017.x

18. Jégouzo Y. (2015) Les Compétences «Aménagement du Territoire et Urbanisme»: Quelle Décentralisation? Revue Française d’Administration Publique. No. 156. P. 1049–1054. DOI: 10.3917/rfap.156.1049

19. Kayden J.S. (2000) National Land-Use Planning in America: Something Whose Time Has Never Come. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy. Vol. 3. P. 445–472.

20. Lee M., Abbot C. (eds.) (2022) English Planning Law: An Outline, Taking English Planning Law Scholarship Seriously. London: UCL Press. DOI: 10.14324/111.9781800082885

21. Milán-García J., Rueda-López N., De Pablo-Valenciano J. (2021) Local Government Efficiency: Reviewing Determinants and Setting New Trends. International Transactions in Operational Research. Vol. 29. Is. 5. P. 2871–2898. DOI: 10.1111/itor.13032

22. Mualam N. (2018) Playing with Supertankers: Centralization in Land Use Planning in Israel — A National Experiment Underway. Land Use Policy. Vol. 75. P. 269–283. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.019

23. Otrusinova M., Pastuszkova E. (2012) Concept of 3 E’s and Public Administration Performance. International Journal of Systems Applications, Engineering & Development. Vol. 6. Is. 2. P. 171–178.

24. Shilova N.V., Golovin A.V. (2024) On the Formation of Public Housing Policy in Russia: A Retrospective Review of the Issue. Voprosy ekonomiki. No. 6. P. 120–132. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2024-6-120-132

25. Skica T., Leśniowska-Gontarz M., Miszczyńska K. (2019) Measuring the Efficiency of Polish Municipalities Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. South East European Journal of Economics and Business. Vol. 14. Is. 2. P. 54–66. DOI: 10.2478/jeb-2019-0013

26. Steffek J., Wegmann P. (2021) The Standardization of «Good Governance» in the Age of Reflexive Modernity. Global Studies Quarterly. Vol. 1. Is. 4. DOI: 10.1093/isagsq/ksab029

27. Trutnev E.K. (2015) The City and the Law: The Legal Institutions Cycling Evolution Logic in the Post-Soviet Russia. Gorodskie issledovaniya i praktiki. No. Pilot. P. 13–32. DOI: 10.17323/usp00201514-33

28. Trutnev E.K. (2019) Gradoregulirovaniye: Pravovoye obespecheniye gradostroitel’noy deyatel’nosti: al’ternativnyye modeli zakonodatel’stva i programma ispravleniya ego oshibok [Urban regulation: Legal support of urban planning activities: Alternative models of legislation and a program for correcting its errors]. Moscow: Fond “Institut ekonomiki goroda”.

29. Yan S., Growe A. (2022) Regional Planning, Land-Use Management, and Governance in German Metropolitan Regions — The Case of Rhine-Neckar Metropolitan Region. Land. 2022. Vol. 11. Is. 11. DOI: 10.3390/land11112088