<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">gosupr</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Государственное управление. Электронный вестник</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Public Administration. E-journal (Russia)</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2070-1381</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Факультет государственного управления МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.55959/MSU2070-1381-106-2024-183-199</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">gosupr-241</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>РЕГИОНАЛЬНАЯ ЭКОНОМИКА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>REGIONAL ECONOMY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Оценка эффективности региональных практик централизации управления в сфере градостроительной деятельности в России</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Assessing the Efficiency of Regional Practices of Governance Centralization in the Field of Urban Planning in Russia</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5999-376X</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Бабейкин</surname><given-names>Р. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Babeykin</surname><given-names>R. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Бабейкин Роман Валерьевич, Эксперт</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Roman V. Babeykin, Expert</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">rbabeikin@hse.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>НИУ «Высшая школа экономики»</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>HSE University</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>05</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>106</issue><fpage>183</fpage><lpage>199</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Бабейкин Р.В., 2026</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Бабейкин Р.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Babeykin R.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.spajournal.ru/jour/article/view/241">https://www.spajournal.ru/jour/article/view/241</self-uri><abstract><p>Исследование посвящено оценке эффективности централизации управления в сфере градостроительной деятельности в России, выраженной в перераспределении муниципальных полномочий в пользу органов власти субъектов РФ. Теоретическая база работы сформирована ключевыми публикациями по тематике управления пространственным развитием городов, рассматриваемыми в контексте теорий государственного и муниципального управления. Показано, что перераспределение муниципальных полномочий в пользу властей субъектов РФ может приводить к повышению относительной эффективности государственной политики по созданию нового жилья; при этом обозначены ограничения использования представленной методологии анализа среды функционирования для изучения изменения результативности осуществления полномочий. Одновременно выявлена двойственность мотивировок региональных властей к инициализации процесса перераспределения: в ряде субъектов РФ оно имело целью повысить эффективность осуществления полномочий, тогда как в других регионах само перераспределение стало следствием достижения высокой эффективности. Как результат, сформулирован тезис о необходимости использования количественных метрик на этапе формулирования состава качественных показателей в рамках введения полноценного мониторинга правоприменения в сфере градостроительной деятельности. В частности, предложенная методология оценки эффективности может быть использована в целях отбора субъектов РФ, которые будут участвовать в пилотном этапе мониторинга. Представленная работа тем самым может выступить базой для совершенствования системы оценки эффективности деятельности органов власти и должностных лиц субъектов РФ в сфере градостроительной деятельности, а также поспособствовать корректировке неэффективных практик перераспределения полномочий в регионах, связанных прежде всего с частичным изъятием тематических полномочий у органов местного самоуправления.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The study is devoted to assessing the efficiency of governance centralization in the sphere of urban planning in Russia, expressed in the redistribution of municipal powers in favor of the authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The theoretical basis of the work is formed by key publications on the topic of urban planning, considered in the context of theories of public administration. It is shown that the redistribution of municipal powers in favor of the authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation can lead to an increase in the relative efficiency of state policy on the creation of new housing; at the same time, the limitations of using the presented methodology of data envelopment analysis when measuring the effectiveness of the exercise of powers are identified. At the same time, the duality of motivations of regional authorities to initiate the redistribution process is revealed: in a number of constituent entities of the Russian Federation, it was aimed at increasing the efficiency of the exercise of powers, while in other regions the redistribution itself was a consequence of achieving high efficiency. As a result, a thesis is formulated on the need to use quantitative metrics at the stage of formulating the composition of qualitative indicators in the framework of the introduction of full-fledged monitoring of law enforcement in the field of urban planning. In particular, the proposed methodology for assessing effectiveness can be used to select in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation that will participate in the pilot stage of monitoring. The presented work can thus serve as a basis for improving the system for assessing the efficiency and effectiveness of the government bodies and officials of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation activities in the field of urban planning, as well as contribute to the adjustment of inefficient practices of redistribution of powers in regions, associated primarily with the partial withdrawal of thematic powers from local authorities’ self-government.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>градостроительная деятельность</kwd><kwd>централизация и децентрализация управления</kwd><kwd>перераспределение муниципальных полномочий</kwd><kwd>эффективность и результативность управления</kwd><kwd>анализ среды функционирования</kwd><kwd>мониторинг правоприменения</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>urban planning</kwd><kwd>centralization and decentralization of governance</kwd><kwd>redistribution of municipal powers</kwd><kwd>efficiency and effectiveness of governance</kwd><kwd>data envelopment analysis</kwd><kwd>monitoring of law enforcement</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бабейкин Р.В. Правовое зонирование. Обзор американского опыта в контексте трансформации российской системы градорегулирования // Городские исследования и практики. 2022. Т. 7. № 3. С. 91–115. DOI: 10.17323/usp73202291-115</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Babeykin R.V. (2022) Legal Zoning: A Review of the US Experience in the Context of the Transformation of the Russian System of Urban Regulation. Gorodskie issledovaniya i praktiki. Vol. 7. No. 3. P. 91–115. DOI: 10.17323/usp73202291-115</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бандорин Л.Е. О перераспределении полномочий органов государственной власти субъектов Российской Федерации и органов местного самоуправления в области земельных отношений // Экологическое право. 2016. № 6. С. 8–14.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Balaguer-Coll M.T., Prior D. (2009) Short- and Long-term Evaluation of Efficiency and Quality. An Application to Spanish Municipalities. Applied Economics. Vol. 41. Is. 23. P. 2991–3002. DOI: 10.1080/00036840701351923</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Береговских А.Н. Предложения по совершенствованию правового регулирования градостроительных и земельно-имущественных отношений // Вестник евразийской науки. 2024. Т. 16. № 2. URL: https: //esj.today/PDF/59SAVN224.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Balaguer-Coll M.T., Prior D., Tortosa-Ausina E. (2013) Output Complexity, Environmental Conditions, and the Efficiency of Municipalities. Journal of Productivity Analysis. Vol. 39. Is. 3. P. 303–324. DOI: 10.1007/s11123-012-0307-x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гудзь Т.В., Бабейкин Р.В., Самоловских Н.В. Тенденции в перераспределении муниципальных полномочий в области градостроительной деятельности // Закон. 2024. № 2. С. 184–195. DOI: 10.37239/0869-4400-2024-21-2-184-195</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bandorin L.E. (2016) Reauthorization of Public Authorities of Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation and Local Authorities in the Field of Land Relations. Ekologicheskoe parvo. No. 6. P. 8–14.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гудзь Т.В., Карасельникова И.В., Косолапов Н.А. Правовое зонирование. Регулирование городской застройки. Опыт Перми. М.: Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2020. DOI: 10.17323/978-5-7598-2300-1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Benito B., Bastida F., García J.A. (2010) The Determinants of Efficiency in Municipal Governments. Applied Economics. Vol. 42. Is. 4. P. 515–528. DOI: 10.1080/00036840701675560</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Добролюбова Е.И., Южаков В.Н., Старостина А.Н. Оценка качества государственного управления: обоснованность, результативность, эффективность. М.: Дело РАНХиГС, 2021.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Beregovskikh A.N. (2024) Proposals for Improving the Legal Regulation of Urban Planning and Land and Property Relations. Vestnik evraziyskoy nauki. Vol. 16. No. 2. Available at: https: //esj.today/PDF/59SAVN224.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ежукова О.А. Об оценке эффективности органов публичной власти в новых конституционно-правовых и социально-экономических условиях // Конституционное и муниципальное право. 2020. № 7. С. 7–12. DOI: 10.18572/1812-3767-2020-7-7-12</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Blom-Hansen J., Houlberg K., Serritzlew S. (2021) Jurisdiction Size and Local Government Effectiveness: Assessing the Effects of Municipal Amalgamations on Performance. European Journal of Political Research. Vol. 60. Is. 1. P. 153–174. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12394</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Трутнев Э.К. Город и право: логика циклического развертывания и свертывания из прошлого в будущее и из настоящего в прошлое институтов правового градорегулирования в постсоветской России // Городские исследования и практики. 2015. № Пилотный. С. 13–32. DOI: 10.17323/usp00201514-33</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Çağlar D. (2021) The Turkish Cypriot Municipalities’ Productivity and Performance: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis and the Tobit Model. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. Vol. 14. Is. 9. DOI: 10.3390/jrfm14090407</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Трутнев Э.К. Градорегулирование: Правовое обеспечение градостроительной деятельности: альтернативные модели законодательства и программа исправления его ошибок. М.: Фонд «Институт экономики города», 2019.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dobrolyubova E.I., Yuzhakov V.N., Starostina A.N. (2021) Otsenka kachestva gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: obosnovannost’, rezul’tativnost’, effektivnost’ [Assessing the quality of public administration: Validity, effectiveness, efficiency]. Moscow: Delo RANKhiGS.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шилова Н.В., Головин А.В. О формировании государственной жилищной политики в России: исторический экскурс в суть вопроса // Вопросы экономики. 2024. № 6. С. 120–132. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2024-6-120-132</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ezhukova O.A. (2020) On the Evaluation of the Efficiency of Public Authorities in New Constitutional Law and Socioeconomic Conditions. Konstitutsionnoye i munitsipal’noye pravo. No. 7. P. 7–12. DOI: 10.18572/1812-3767-2020-7-7-12</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Balaguer-Coll M.T., Prior D. Short- and Long-term Evaluation of Efficiency and Quality. An Application to Spanish Municipalities // Applied Economics. 2009. Vol. 41. Is. 23. P. 2991–3002. DOI: 10.1080/00036840701351923</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Faguet J.-P. (2021) Understanding Decentralization Theory, Evidence and Method, with a Focus on Least-developed Countries. Working Paper Series. No. 21–203. Available at: https: //www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/251596/1/1744149798.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Balaguer-Coll M.T., Prior D., Tortosa-Ausina E. Output Complexity, Environmental Conditions, and the Efficiency of Municipalities // Journal of Productivity Analysis. 2013. Vol. 39. Is. 3. P. 303–324. DOI: 10.1007/s11123-012-0307-x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gallent N., de Magalhaes C., Trigo S.F. (2021) Is Zoning the Solution to the UK Housing Crisis? Planning Practice &amp; Research. Vol. 36. Is. 1. P. 1-19. DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2020.1829283</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Benito B., Bastida F., García J.A. The Determinants of Efficiency in Municipal Governments // Applied Economics. 2010. Vol. 42. Is. 4. P. 515–528. DOI: 10.1080/00036840701675560</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Garcia-Sanchez I.M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros B., Frias-Aceituno J. (2013) Determinants of Government Effectiveness. International Journal of Public Administration. Vol. 36. Is. 8. P. 567–577. DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2013.772630</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Blom-Hansen J., Houlberg K., Serritzlew S. Jurisdiction Size and Local Government Effectiveness: Assessing the Effects of Municipal Amalgamations on Performance // European Journal of Political Research. 2021. Vol. 60. Is. 1. P. 153–174. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12394</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gisselquist R.M. (2012) Good Governance as a Concept, and Why This Matters for Development Policy. WIDER Working Paper 2012/030. Available at: https: //www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/81039/1/688432662.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Çağlar D. The Turkish Cypriot Municipalities’ Productivity and Performance: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis and the Tobit Model // Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2021. Vol. 14. Is. 9. DOI: 10.3390/jrfm14090407</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gudz T.V., Babeykin R.V., Samolovskikh N.V. (2024) Trends in the Redistribution of Municipal Powers in the Field of Urban Planning. Zakon. No. 2. P. 184–195. DOI: 10.37239/0869-4400-2024-21-2-184-195</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">English Planning Law: An Outline, Taking English Planning Law Scholarship Seriously / ed. by M. Lee, C. Abbot. London: UCL Press, 2022. DOI: 10.14324/111.9781800082885</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gudz T.V., Karaselnikova I.V., Kosolapov N.A. (2020) Pravovoe zonirovanie. Regulirovanie gorodskoj zastrojki. Opyt Permi [Legal zoning. Regulation of urban development. Perm experience]. Moscow: Izdatel’skiy dom NIU VShE. DOI: 10.17323/978-5-7598-2300-1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Faguet J.-P. Understanding Decentralization Theory, Evidence and Method, with a Focus on Least- developed Countries // Working Paper Series No. 21–203. 2021. URL: https: //www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/251596/1/1744149798.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hager C. (2012) Revisiting the Ungovernability Debate: Regional Governance and Sprawl in the USA and UK. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. Vol. 36. Is. 4. P. 817–830. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.01017.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gallent N., de Magalhaes C., Trigo S.F. Is Zoning the Solution to the UK Housing Crisis? // Planning Practice &amp; Research. 2021. Vol. 36. Is. 1. P. 1–19. DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2020.1829283</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jégouzo Y. (2015) Les Compétences «Aménagement du Territoire et Urbanisme»: Quelle Décentralisation? Revue Française d’Administration Publique. No. 156. P. 1049–1054. DOI: 10.3917/rfap.156.1049</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Garcia-Sanchez I.M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros B., Frias-Aceituno J. Determinants of Government Effectiveness // International Journal of Public Administration. 2013. Vol. 36. Is. 8. P. 567–577. DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2013.772630</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kayden J.S. (2000) National Land-Use Planning in America: Something Whose Time Has Never Come. Washington University Journal of Law &amp; Policy. Vol. 3. P. 445–472.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gisselquist R.M. Good Governance as a Concept, and Why This Matters for Development Policy // WIDER Working Paper 2012/030. 2012. URL: https: //www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/81039/1/688432662.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lee M., Abbot C. (eds.) (2022) English Planning Law: An Outline, Taking English Planning Law Scholarship Seriously. London: UCL Press. DOI: 10.14324/111.9781800082885</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hager C. Revisiting the Ungovernability Debate: Regional Governance and Sprawl in the USA and UK // International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2012. Vol. 36. Is. 4. P. 817–830. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.01017.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Milán-García J., Rueda-López N., De Pablo-Valenciano J. (2021) Local Government Efficiency: Reviewing Determinants and Setting New Trends. International Transactions in Operational Research. Vol. 29. Is. 5. P. 2871–2898. DOI: 10.1111/itor.13032</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jégouzo Y. Les Compétences «Aménagement du Territoire et Urbanisme»: Quelle Décentralisation? // Revue Française d’Administration Publique. 2015. No. 156. P. 1049–1054. DOI: 10.3917/rfap.156.1049</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mualam N. (2018) Playing with Supertankers: Centralization in Land Use Planning in Israel — A National Experiment Underway. Land Use Policy. Vol. 75. P. 269–283. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.019</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kayden J.S. National Land-Use Planning in America: Something Whose Time Has Never Come // Washington University Journal of Law &amp; Policy. 2000. Vol. 3. P. 445–472.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Otrusinova M., Pastuszkova E. (2012) Concept of 3 E’s and Public Administration Performance. International Journal of Systems Applications, Engineering &amp; Development. Vol. 6. Is. 2. P. 171–178.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Milán-García J., Rueda-López N., De Pablo-Valenciano J. Local Government Efficiency: Reviewing Determinants and Setting New Trends // International Transactions in Operational Research. 2021. Vol. 29. Is. 5. P. 2871– 2898. DOI: 10.1111/itor.13032</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shilova N.V., Golovin A.V. (2024) On the Formation of Public Housing Policy in Russia: A Retrospective Review of the Issue. Voprosy ekonomiki. No. 6. P. 120–132. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2024-6-120-132</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mualam N. Playing with Supertankers: Centralization in Land Use Planning in Israel — A National Experiment Underway // Land Use Policy. 2018. Vol. 75. P. 269–283. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.019</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Skica T., Leśniowska-Gontarz M., Miszczyńska K. (2019) Measuring the Efficiency of Polish Municipalities Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. South East European Journal of Economics and Business. Vol. 14. Is. 2. P. 54–66. DOI: 10.2478/jeb-2019-0013</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Otrusinova M., Pastuszkova E. Concept of 3 E’s and Public Administration Performance // International Journal of Systems Applications, Engineering &amp; Development. 2012. Vol. 6. Is. 2. P. 171–178.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Steffek J., Wegmann P. (2021) The Standardization of «Good Governance» in the Age of Reflexive Modernity. Global Studies Quarterly. Vol. 1. Is. 4. DOI: 10.1093/isagsq/ksab029</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Skica T., Leśniowska-Gontarz M., Miszczyńska K. Measuring the Efficiency of Polish Municipalities Data Envelopment Analysis Approach // South East European Journal of Economics and Business. 2019. Vol. 14. Is. 2. P. 54–66. DOI: 10.2478/jeb-2019-0013</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trutnev E.K. (2015) The City and the Law: The Legal Institutions Cycling Evolution Logic in the Post-Soviet Russia. Gorodskie issledovaniya i praktiki. No. Pilot. P. 13–32. DOI: 10.17323/usp00201514-33</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Steffek J., Wegmann P. The Standardization of «Good Governance» in the Age of Reflexive Modernity // Global Studies Quarterly. 2021. Vol. 1. Is. 4. DOI: 10.1093/isagsq/ksab029</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trutnev E.K. (2019) Gradoregulirovaniye: Pravovoye obespecheniye gradostroitel’noy deyatel’nosti: al’ternativnyye modeli zakonodatel’stva i programma ispravleniya ego oshibok [Urban regulation: Legal support of urban planning activities: Alternative models of legislation and a program for correcting its errors]. Moscow: Fond “Institut ekonomiki goroda”.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yan S., Growe A. Regional Planning, Land-Use Management, and Governance in German Metropolitan Regions — The Case of Rhine-Neckar Metropolitan Region // Land. 2022. Vol. 11. Is. 11. DOI: 10.3390/land11112088</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yan S., Growe A. (2022) Regional Planning, Land-Use Management, and Governance in German Metropolitan Regions — The Case of Rhine-Neckar Metropolitan Region. Land. 2022. Vol. 11. Is. 11. DOI: 10.3390/land11112088</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
