Relevance of the Indicator “Quantity of Intellectual Property Assets” for Operational Management of Regional Innovation Efforts

In order to increase the efficiency of operational management of innovative development of the subjects of the Russian Federation, it is necessary to reduce the time lag between obtaining primary statistical data and processing analytical information for government employees. The scientific research analyzed the relevance of such a primary statistical indicator as “the number of intellectual property objects of the subjects of the Russian Federation”. The relevance of the indicator was justified by formalizing the relationship between the quality of an operational management decision and time, as well as by conducting a correlation and regression analysis between the indicators “number of intellectual property objects of the subjects of the Russian Federation” and the complex indicator “rating of innovative development of the subjects of the Russian Federation”; proposals were formulated for operational management solutions that increase innovation at the regional level. To achieve the aims of the research, such scientific methods as analysis, deduction, synthesis, graphical method and statistical method were used. As a result of the research, it was found that there is a strong positive relationship between the indicators, which is confirmed by the Spearman correlation coefficient based on the rating of innovative development of the subjects of the Russian Federation for 2020 and 2023 years of publication based on statistical data for 2019 and 2021. It was also determined that the statistical significance of the data is high, which is confirmed by the coefficient of determination based on statistical data for 2019 and 2021. The interannual relationship of the data indicates a tendency towards an increase in the relationship of indicators for 2019 and 2021 years of statistical observations, which is confirmed by the Student’s criterion. In that way, the relevance of the indicator “number of intellectual property objects” for the purposes of operational management of innovation activities is high and proven. The results obtained can be used as a basis for creating an operational integral indicator of regional innovation activity and for adjusting the tools used by government officials in the field of managing the innovative development of Russian regions.

1. Abdulganiev F.S., Maratkanova E.M. (2021) Features of the Economy of Knowledge and Its Influence on the Efficiency of Development of Innovation-Oriented Firms. Ekonomicheskiye nauki. No. 205. P. 220–226. DOI: 10.14451/1.205.220

2. Chikezie P.M., Ewim A., Achumie G., Adeleke A., Okeke I., Mokogwu C. (2024) Strategic Planning and Operational Excellence: A Conceptual Model for Growth in Tech Businesses. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development. Vol. 20. Is. 11. P. 342–351.

3. Eberhard K. (2023) The Effects of Visualization on Judgment and Decision-Making: a Systematic Literature Review. Management Review Quarterly. Vol. 73. P. 167–214. DOI: 10.1007/s11301-021-00235-8

4. Egorov N.E., Babkin A.V., Vasilyeva N.V., Pavlov D.A. (2021) The Relationship of Intellectual and Innovative Activities in the Federal Districts of the Russian Federation. Vestnik Akademii znaniy. No. 44(3). P. 99–106. DOI: 10.24412/2304-6139-2021-11220

5. Fraumeni B.M. (2022) Gross Domestic Product: Are Other Measures Needed? IZA World of Labor. DOI: 10.15185/izawol.368.v2

6. Han D., Fang S., Zhu H. (2024) Research on the Development Relationship Between Safety Production Indicators and Economic and Social Indicators in China. Scientific Reports. Vol. 14. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70945-y

7. Herzer D. (2022) The Impact of Domestic and Foreign R&D on TFP in Developing Countries. World Development. Vol. 151. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105754

8. Petrovskaya Yu.A., Shchekina I.V. (2018) Implementation of the Innovative Development Strategy of the Russian Federation up to 2020: Results and Prospects. Vestnik NGUEU. No. 4. P. 157–170.

9. Rabhi M., Harizi R.A., Djoual M., Thamri A. (2024) Empowering Work Teams as a Mechanism to Increase the Speed of Administrative Decision-Making. International Journal of Business Information Systems. Vol. 12. Is. 2. P. 145–165.

10. Sysoyeva E.V. (2018) Strategic Approaches to Managing Organizations. Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. Vol. 8. No. 10A. P. 223–233.

11. Varenik M.S. (2024) Impact of Research and Innovative Activity on Russian Regions’ GRP: Correlation and Regression Analysis. Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye. Elektronnyy vestnik. No. 107. P. 171–180. DOI: 10.55959/MSU2070-1381-107-2024-171-180

12. Vlasov M.V. (2023) Research Performance and Its Impact on the Innovation-Driven Development at the Regional Level. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Ser. “Ekonomika”. Vol. 18. No. 1. P. 53–72. DOI: 10.17072/1994-9960-2023-1-53-72

13. Volkova N.N., Romanyuk E.I. (2023) Rating of Scientific and Technological Development of the Subjects of the Russian Federation. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. No. 2. P. 50–72. DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2023_2_50_72

14. Zakhidov G. (2024) Economic Indicators: Tools for Analyzing Market Trends and Predicting Future Performance. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Universal Scientific Prospectives. Vol. 2. P. 23–29.

15. Zvyagintseva O.P., Shcherbakov A.S. (2024) Trends in Human Resources Assessment in the Modern Digital Space. Nauka i iskusstvo upravleniya / Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. No. 2. P. 10–21. DOI: 10.28995/2782-2222-2024-2-10-21