Preview

Public Administration. E-journal (Russia)

Advanced search

Evolution of CSTO Bodies’ Structure in the Context of Transformation of Military and Political Situation in the Post-Soviet Space

https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-107-2024-161-170

Abstract

The aim of the article is to analyze the main factors of transforming the structure of CSTO bodies as an international regional organization in the field of security, taking into account the circumstances characterizing the military and political situation on the territory of the post-Soviet states. To do this, the article solves the tasks of determining the content of the CSTO functions in the context of the changing military and political situation in the post-Soviet space, as well as considering the architecture of the CSTO bodies and its dependence on the transformation of the military and political situation in the post-Soviet space, the development of CSTO expert and analytical bodies’ structure. The architecture of the CSTO governing bodies is presented as the result of a combination of the functional content of the organization’s activities and events in the field of military and political security of the CSTO member states. The article provides some examples of recent years, which determine specific military and political decisions in the field of transformation of the organizational and legal basis of the CSTO activities. The development of the organization’s structure is largely the result of responding to the transformation of modern threats and risks to the military and political security of the CSTO member states. Based on the application of political analysis (event analysis, content analysis), a natural connection is traced between the CSTO mandate and the objective circumstances of the development of the military and political situation in the post-Soviet space. The uneven dynamics in the change of CSTO governing bodies’ architecture is noted, the special role of the organization’s departments and working bodies responsible for prompt response to emerging risks and threats is revealed. The potential for the development of regional security systems and further integration of the organization’s member states directly depends on the ability of the CSTO structures to flexibly respond to modern challenges and threats. The changes that are taking place in the military and political management bodies of the CSTO indicate the organization’s desire to maintain a high level of collective security in the post-Soviet space.

About the Author

A. P. Khlopko
Central Russian Institute of Management — branch of RANEPA
Russian Federation

Anton P. Khlopko, PhD applicant

Orel



References

1. Allison R. (2018) Protective Integration and Security Policy Coordination: Comparing the SCO and CSTO. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. Vol. 11. Is. 3. P. 297–338. DOI: 10.1093/cjip/poy008

2. Camroux D. (2012) Regionalism in Asia as Disguised Multilateralism. A Critical Analysis of the East Asia Summit and the Trans-Pacific PartnershiP. The International Spectator. Vol. 47. Is. 1. P. 97–115.

3. Chernyavskiy S.I. (2020) Community of Independent States as an Organization of Regional Security. Problemy postsovetskogo prostranstva. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 142–153. DOI: 10.24975/2313-8920-2020-7-2-142-153

4. Evseev V.V. (2021) CSTO and Security in the Post-Soviet Space. Postsovetskiy materik. No. 2 P. 13–24. DOI: 10.12345/2311-6412_2021_2_13

5. Laumulin M., Shaken M. (2008) Kazakhstansko-rossiyskiye otnosheniya v kontekste vneshnepoliticheskoy strategii Moskvy [Kazakhstan and Russia: Relations as part of Russia’s foreign policy strategy]. Tsentral’naya Aziya i Kavkaz. No. 1(55). P. 130–144.

6. Malinovsky O.N., Paschenko I.Yu. (2016) Problems of Development of the CSTO and Increase of its role in Ensuring Collective Security in Eurasia. Istoricheskaya i sotsial’no-obrazovatel’naya mysl’. Vol. 8. No. 3–1. P. 17–21.

7. Melikyan G.G. (2020) Place and Role of the Collective Security Treaty Organization in the Process of Building a Regional Security System after the Collapse of the USSR. Obshchestvo: politika, ekonomika, pravo. No. 6. P. 31–35.

8. Nikitin A.I. (2017) ODKB: evolyutsiya funktsiy i struktur obespecheniya bezopasnosti [The CSTO: The evolution of security functions and structures]. SIPRI Yearbook 2016. Armaments, Disarmament and International Security. Moscow: IMEMO RAN. P. 910–927.

9. Parezanović M. (2022) Operacija ODKB u Kazahstanu 2022. godine. Baština. Br. 57. Str. 141–155. DOI: 10.5937/bastina32-39399

10. Pritchin S.A. (2022) Political Crisis in Kazakhstan. Rossiya i novye gosudarstva Evrazii. No. 1(54). P. 56–67. DOI: 10.20542/2073-4786-2022-1-56-67

11. Seleznev I.A. (2018) ODKB i ShOS: institutsional’naya rol’ v bezopasnosti stran Tsentral’noy Azii [The CSTO and the SCO: The institutional role in the security of the Central Asian countries]. SOTIS — sotsial’nyye tekhnologii issledovaniya. No. 2(88). P. 63–70.

12. Sokołowska A. (2023 On the Role of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) and Ensuring Security and Support for Armenia as Its Signatory During the Ongoing Armed Conflict with Azerbaijan. Gubernaculum et Administratio. Vol. 28. Is. 2. P. 95–111. DOI: 10.16926/gea.2023.02.07

13. Tasmagambetov I.N. (2024) ODKB: neizmennye prioritety v usloviyah menyayushchegosya miroporyadka [CSTO: Unchanged priorities in a changing world order]. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn’. No. 2. P. 18–27.

14. Teteryuk A.S., Chizhevskiy Ya.A. (2013) The Central Asian Track of Russian Foreign Policy. Mezhdunarodnyye protsessy. Vol. 11. No. 3–4(34–35). P. 103–115.

15. Troitskiy E.F., Zinoviev V.P. (2018) The Collective Security Treaty Organisation: Emergence, Evolution and Crisis of the Military-Political Alliance. Rusin. No. 4(54). P. 335–351. DOI: 10.17223/18572685/54/20

16. Turlybayeva D.T. (2022) Stages of Formation and Formation of the Collective Security Treaty Organization. Chelovecheskiy kapital. No. 7(163). P. 75–82. DOI: 10.25629/HC.2022.07.08

17. Zverev Y.M. (2020) Military Exercises of Russia and Belarus as a Response to the Intensification of NATO Military Activities. Evraziya. Ekspert. No. 3–4. P. 13–22. DOI: 10.18254/S271332140013177-1


Review

For citations:


Khlopko A.P. Evolution of CSTO Bodies’ Structure in the Context of Transformation of Military and Political Situation in the Post-Soviet Space. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2024;1(107):161-170. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-107-2024-161-170

Views: 42

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2070-1381 (Online)