Preview

Public Administration. E-journal (Russia)

Advanced search

Instruments of Interaction between State Corporations and Subjects of the Russian Federation

https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-109-2025-185-196

Abstract

Modern geopolitical and economic conditions and environment are characterized by extreme tension and uncertainty, and therefore solving the problems of developing the country’s economy, regions, and businesses requires new concepts, methods, approaches, mechanisms, and tools for building relationships at all levels of the system. Currently, there is an inconsistency in the strategic planning documents of the state authorities of the Russian Federation subjects and state corporations, as well as the lack of a legislative definition of individual mechanisms of interaction. In this regard, the relevance of the study is defined by highlighting mechanisms of interaction between state corporations and the subjects of the Russian Federation and is associated with the identification of this type of interaction to ensure national security, strengthen technological cooperation. and the economic sovereignty of the Russian Federation and the development of market relations. The aim of the study is to identify the instruments of interaction between state corporations and the subjects of the Russian Federation. The purpose is to determine the essence and levels of interaction between state corporations and subjects of the Russian Federation, to identify the role of the state corporation in solving socio-economic problems in the regions of its presence. The methodology is based on systematic, complex and logical approaches to the problem, methods of analysis and synthesis, induction, deduction, abstraction and concretization, contributing to the building of classification features for determining the tools of interaction, comparative and structural analysis of research materials. The scientific basis is represented by a set of modern developments in the form of scientific concepts and opinions of scientists. The empirical base covers information about state corporations and the legislation of the Russian Federation. Tools for interaction between government corporations with the subjects of the Russian Federation are understood as methods, techniques and means of coordinating, structuring and developing strategic partnerships between residents, connecting, integrating and matrix techniques to overcome disagreements and stresses, minimize violations and deviations, and consolidate efforts. The instruments of interaction between the region and state corporations include legal, organizational and modernization, institutional, motivational, infrastructural, innovative, technological, investment, tax, social, personnel (intellectual), information instruments. The forms of positive influence of state corporations on the socio-economic development of the region include financial, social, organizational, technical, technological, economic, and environmental. In the interaction of state corporations and the region, the latter gets benefits by investment interest, the expansion of tax deductions, the creation of high-performance jobs, the introduction of modern technologies, and the building of rational and growing social support for the population. As a conclusion, it is stated that in new conditions, the role of state corporations is increasing in order to solve the tasks of national security, protection, and strengthening of technological and economic sovereignty, the development of regions and the improvement of the standard of living of the population. The choice of interaction tools is specific to each region and government corporations. In the context of international turbulence and sanctions pressure from unfriendly countries (from 21.02.2022 to 23.01.2025, more than 18 thousand sanctions were adopted), state corporations make a significant contribution to ensuring national protection and sovereignty, using a set of interaction tools, and actively implement projects and investment programs at the regional level, building relationships with the state authorities of the subjects of the Russian Federation.

About the Author

T. O. Tarba
Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Timur O. Tarba, Advisor to the Secretariat of the Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation

Moscow 



References

1. Ascheulov A.V. (2013) Regulatory Tools of Region and Corporations Interaction. Rossiyskoye predprinimatel’stvo. Vol. 14. No. 23. P. 20–28.

2. Berkovich M.I., Antipina N.I. (2016) The Impact of Large Corporations on the Socio-Economic Development of the Region. Regional’naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika. No. 11(434). P. 38–53.

3. Borovkova V.A., Borovkova V.A. (2018) Reframing the Risk Management Process of Entities. Ekonomicheskiy analiz: teoriya i praktika. Vol. 17. No. 8. P. 1428–1448. DOI: 10.24891/ea.17.8.1428

4. Cardinale R., Landoni M., Mi Z. (2024) Global State-Owned Enterprises in the 21st Century: Rethinking Their Contribution to Structural Change, Innovation, and Public Policy. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. Vol. 68. P. 468–472. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2024.01.013

5. Dionisio M., Raupp de Vargas E. (2022) Integrating Corporate Social Innovations and Cross-Collaboration: An Empirical Study. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 139. P. 794–803. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.039

6. Faikov D.Yu., Baydarov D.Yu. (2022) Taking into Account the Peculiarities of Closed Nuclear Cities in the Strategic Development Plans of Various Levels. Aktual’nyye voprosy ekonomiki. Vol. 4. No. 1. P. 28–48. DOI: 10.24412/2071-6435-2022-4-28-48

7. Hassan S.T., Wang P., Khan I., Zhu B. (2023) The Impact of Economic Complexity, Technology Advancements, and Nuclear Energy Consumption on the Ecological Footprint of the USA: Towards Circular Economy Initiatives. Gondwana Research. Vol. 113. P. 237–246. DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2022.11.001

8. Koroleva N.A. (2013) The Megacorporation’s Resource Investment of the Zones of Post-Industrial Growth Inside the Regional Economy System. Terra Economicus. Vol. 11. No. 1–3. P. 132–135.

9. Kurchenkov V.V., Makarenko O.S., Kurchenkova M.V. (2019) To the Question on the Institutional Status of Public Corporations. Vestnik Astrakhanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. No. 1. P. 7–14. DOI: 10.24143/2073-5537-2019-1-7-14

10. Matasov M.V. (2013) Modeli vzaimodeystviya krupnykh biznes-korporatsiy i gosudarstva v regional’nom formate [Models of interaction between large business corporations and the state in a regional format]. Vlast’. No. 2. P. 116–120.

11. Neri A., Cagno E., Lepri M., Trianni A. (2021) A Triple Bottom Line Balanced Set of Key Performance Indicators to Measure the Sustainability Performance of Industrial Supply Chains. Sustainable Production and Consumption. Vol. 26. P. 648–691. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.018

12. Nikitin A.S. (2013) Organizatsiya raboty po vzaimodeystviyu s organami vlasti na primere gosudarstvennoy korporatsii «Rostekhnologii» [Organization of work on interaction with authorities on the example of the state corporation “Rostekhnologii”]. Vestnik universiteta. No. 20. P. 52–55.

13. Tsygalov Yu.M., Butova T.V., Ordinartsev I.I. (2017) Efficiency of the State Corporations in Depressive Regions Development. Upravlencheskoye konsul’tirovaniye. No. 10(106). P. 46–58. DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2017-10-46-58


Review

For citations:


Tarba T.O. Instruments of Interaction between State Corporations and Subjects of the Russian Federation. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2025;1(109):185-196. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-109-2025-185-196

Views: 57

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2070-1381 (Online)