Legislative Discourse of State Support for Youth Social Initiatives in Russian Federation and Republic of Belarus

The development of the young generation potential is one of the most important state priorities in almost all countries of the world. The sphere of public regulation encompasses youth activity; which is a subject to predetermined directions of youth policy implementation. This enables the formation of a “corridor” of constructive youth activity and influence on the social consciousness of the young generation of citizens. This article examines the legal basis of state support to youth social initiatives; drawing upon a number of scientific studies and an analysis of official documents from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus. The authors demonstrate that youth social initiatives in the legislative field of the compared countries are interpreted in a vague manner as socially useful labour; socially significant activities; and creative activity in a project format. Such initiatives are often defined in a more formal manner; although the substance of these definitions is not always clear. The official documents of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus in the context of supporting youth social initiatives do not acknowledge the subjectivity of young people themselves; nor do they define the content of their activity as a socially significant activity. The normative definition of youth social initiatives fails to acknowledge the role of young people’s personalities and leadership. The diversity of the youth community is not adequately addressed. Public participation of young people is primarily defined by the inclusion of young Russians and Belarusians in political institutions specifically designed for them; as well as network and controlled youth public organisations and associations. The scientific novelty of this work lies in its outlined prospects for the development of Russian- Belarusian cooperation in the field of education and youth policy; based on the support of youth social initiatives; while taking into account the established practices of state support for youth activity. It is recommended that a definition of youth social initiatives be incorporated into various legal documents pertaining to bilateral cooperation. Moreover; the implementation of these initiatives should be facilitated through the involvement of youth organisations and associations; public discourse; and the development of project-based youth initiative ideas in collaboration with higher education institutions.

1. Alekhina I.S.; Putrya N.G. (2020) Youth as a Subject and Object of State Youth Policy: Problematic Aspects of the Concept. Upravlencheskoye konsul’tirovaniye. No. 3(135). P. 39–46. DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2020-3-39-46

2. Brown W. (2015) Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.

3. Burman E. (1991) What Discourse Is Not. Philosophical Psychology. Vol. 4. Is. 3. P. 325–342. DOI: 10.1080/09515089108573034

4. Buzovsky I.I. (2023) The Role of the State Youth Policy in Maintaining Social and Political Stability in the Republic of Belarus. Belaruskaya dumka. No. 9. Р. 83–91.

5. Davidson E.; Carlin E. (2019) “Steeling” Young People: Resilience and Youth Policy in Scotland. Social Policy and Society. Vol. 18. Is. 3. P. 479–489. DOI: 10.1017/S1474746419000095

6. Dedinkin A.L. (2021) Legal Discourse as a Multi-Dimensional Integrated Phenomenon and Legal Linguistics as a Syncretic Science. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vol. 23. No. 1(85). P. 220–228. DOI: 10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-1-220-228

7. Dyzhova A.A. (2023) The Main Problems of the Formation of Youth Policy in Belarus and Russia: Comparative Analysis. Vestnik Mogilevskogo instituta MVD. No. 2(8). P. 105–110.

8. Foucault M. (2012) L‘Archeologie du savor. Saint Petersburg: Gumanitarnaya akademiya.

9. Irwin S. (2020) Young People in the Middle: Pathways; Prospects; Policies and a New Agenda for Youth Research. Journal of Youth Studies. Vol. 24. Is. 8. P. 1033–1051. DOI: 10.1080/13676261.2020.1792864

10. Ivanov R.V. (2021) Regional Youth Policy: Expert Analysis. Sotsiologiya. No. 1. P. 93–102.

11. Kasyanov V.V.; Davydova G.I.; Mоtsovkina E.V.; Ganshina G.V.; Gafiatulina N.K.; Sheinova T.G.; Zavarina S.Y. (2021) Volunteering as a Mechanism of Socio-Pedagogical Work and Youth Social Policy of the State under the Conditions of Risk. Humanidades & Inovação; Vol. 8. Is. 31. P. 78–86.

12. Kochetkov A.V. (2023) State Youth Policy: Search for an Integrative Model Formation. Nauka. Kul’tura. Obshchestvo. Vol. 29. No. 3. P. 120–135. DOI: 10.19181/nko.2023.29.3.7

13. Kotova O.V.; Sen’ko V.V.; Lukashevich T.S. (2023) Rol’ molodezhnykh obshchestvennykh ob”yedineniy v realizatsii molodezhnoy politiki [The role of youth public associations in the implementation of youth policy]. Vysshaya shkola: nauchno-metodicheskiy i publitsisticheskiy zhurnal. No. 2. P. 3–7.

14. Leonova O.V. (2020) State Youth Policy of the Russian Federation: Development Practice and New Legislative Paradigms. Vlast’. Vol. 28. No. 6. P. 122–129. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v28i6.7736

15. Li X. (2020) The Critical Assessment of the Youth Policy and Youth Civic Engagement in Denmark and Three Danish Municipalities. Children and Youth Services Review. Vol. 110. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104743

16. Lüküslü D.; Pais A.; Tuorto D.; Walther A.; Loncle P. (2018) Local Constellations of Youth Participation in Comparative Perspective. PARTISPACE working paper D6.1. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1240190

17. Maiboroda A.; Sablina A.; Yasaveev I. (2021) The State for Youth or Youth for the State: Discourses of Youth Policy in the EU and Russia. Sotsiologicheskoye obozreniye. Vol. 20. No. 3. P. 71–97. DOI: 10.17323/1728-192X-2021-3-71-97

18. Mazzoni D.; Cicognani E.; Cifatte C.; Albanes C.; Zani B.; Floresta L. (2019) Italian Young People Through the Lens of Youth Policies. Social Studies. Vol. 15. Is. 2. P. 75–96. DOI: 10.5817/SOC2018-2-75

19. Mertanen K.; Mäkelä K.; Brunila K. (2020) What’s the Problem (Represented To Be) in Finnish Youth Policies and Youth Support Systems? International Studies in Sociology of Education. Vol. 31. Is. 3. P. 264–283. DOI: 10.1080/09620214.2020.1752770

20. Miranda D.; Castillo J.C.; Sandoval-Hernandez A. (2020) Young Citizens Participation: Empirical Testing of a Conceptual Model. Youth & Society. Vol. 52. Is. 2. P. 251–271. DOI: 10.1177/0044118X17741024

21. Musina N.E. (2014) Kontseptual’nyye osnovy molodezhnoy politiki [Conceptual foundations of youth policy].Belarusk ya dumka. No. 10. P. 60–65.

22. Omelchenko E.L.; Lisovskaya I.V. (2022) Youth as a Barometer of the Future? The Youth Agenda in Contemporary Russia as Viewed by Youth Policy Experts. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny. No. 2(168). P. 66–92. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2022.2.2078

23. Pevnaya M.V.; Bagirova A.P.; Bahtigareeva (E.N.); Wenyue Z. (2022) Legal Regulation of Youth Civic Participation in Russia and European Union. DEMIS. Demograficheskiye issledovaniya. Vol. 2. No. 3. P. 8–24. DOI: 10.19181/demis.2022.2.3.1

24. Reutov E.V.; Reutova M.N.; Shavyrina I.V.; Turyansky A.A. (2017) Self-Organization in Local Communities: Practices And Mechanisms. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny. No. 4(10). P. 145–164. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2017.4.10

25. Sakaeva Z.M. (2019) Features of Normative Legal Discourse. Elektronnyy nauchno-metodicheskiy zhurnal Omskogo GAU. No. 3(18). Available at: https://e-journal.omgau.ru/images/issues/2019/3/00753.pdf

26. Sarpekov R.K. (2023) The Legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the State Youth Policy: Analysis; Problems and Improvement. Vestnik Instituta zakonodatel’stva i pravovoy informatsii Respubliki Kazakhstan. No. 3(74). P. 22–30. DOI: 10.52026/2788-5291_2023_74_3_22

27. Saussure F. (1998) Cours de linguistique générale. Moscow: Logos.

28. Selezneva A.V.; Zinenko V.E. (2020) Political Activity of Russian Youth: Current Development Trends. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. No. 2. P. 192–208. DOI: 10.18384/2224-0209-2020-2-1012

29. Smirnov V.A. (2023) Youth Policy and Educational Activities in Russian Universities: Stages of Development and Key Contradictions. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. Vol. 32. No. 5. P. 9–20. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-5-9-20

30. Stoppe A.G. (2022) Youth Policy in the Union State: Youth — its Present and Future. Vestnik ekonomiki; prava i sotsiologii. No. 3. P. 229–232.

31. Van Dijk T.A. (2008) Discourse and Context. A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

32. Vilisov M.V.; Batovrina E.V.; Mikhaylova O.V. (2021) The Perception of Russia by Young People in Post- Soviet Countries: The Experience of Sociological Assessment. Kontury global’nykh transformatsiy: politika; ekonomika; parvo. Vol. 14. No. 5. P. 212–230. DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2021-14-5-11

33. Walther A.; Lüküslü D.G.; Loncle P.; Pais A. (2020) Regimes of Youth Participation? Comparative Analysis of Youth Policies and Participation across European Cities. YOUNG. Vol. 29. Is. 2. P. 191–209. DOI: 10.1177/1103308820937550

34. Zubok Yu.A.; Chuprov V.I. (2019) Self-Regulation of Life Purpose Values in Youth Cultural Space. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. Vol. 10. No. 4. P. 164–186. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2019.31.4.614