Preview

Public Administration. E-journal (Russia)

Advanced search

Main Directions of Modern Transformation and Modernization of Russian Society, Ways to Overcome the Systemic Crisis in the Context of Technological Revolution: Alternative Strategic Development Models

https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-105-2024-93-104

Abstract

At the present stage of Russia’s development in the prevailing historical conditions, a period of deep conceptual transformations has begun, measures are being taken to free it from its continued dependence on crisis global processes, from the globalism policy of developed imperialist countries. Today, after three periods of permanent systemic crisis, through which Russia went from the early 80s to the early 2000s, the country is emerging from this dependence, returning to its mental ideological and cultural foundations, to state-political, economic, scientific, technical and technological sovereignty, to the status of a world power, renewed civilization, towards the consolidation of society. This period is characterized as a period of transformation and new modernization of society. The article, based on new approaches and methods of a comprehensive historical, sociological and formational-civilizational analysis of the problems of society’s development, examines the issues of the new modernization of society that has begun, analyzes and evaluates the persistent manifestations of the systemic crisis, issues of implementing an innovative anti-crisis management strategy, strategic planning and strategic management. Possible forecasts and alternatives for social development are considered. These processes require a clear, meaningful choice and implementation of a long-term strategy for the dynamic, innovative development of knowledge-intensive sectors of the economy, labor productivity growth, production recovery based on new reindustrialization and the industrial revolution, the development and implementation of achievements of the fifth technological order, scientific, technical, technological, information revolution, the formation of new scientific, human resources, including in the areas of governance of society and the state, ensuring comprehensive security and sovereignty of society and the state, regulatory support for these processes. This implies the choice of a new socio-economic, formational and civilizational model for further progressive development, taking into account positive domestic and foreign experience, and the corresponding ideological basis for these transformations. All this is becoming an urgent issue for the entire spectrum of social and social sciences, for educational practices.

About the Author

V. I. Shmakov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Vladimir I. Shmakov, PhD, Associate Professor, School of Public Administration 

Moscow

 



References

1. Bordean I., Reileanu A., Turtureanu A.G. (2009) Strategic Planning in Public Administration. Proceedings of the Fifth “Administration and Public Management” International Conference: “Public Institutions’ Capacity to Implement the Administrative Reform Process”. Bucharest: Research Center for Public Administration and Public Services. No. 14. P. 141–153.

2. Buchwald E.M. (2022) Inresolved Issues of “Public Policy Framework for Strategic Planning”. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossijskoj akademii nauk. No. 1. P. 32–49. DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2022_1_32_49

3. Buklagin D.S. (2017) The Fifth Technological Mode: The Position of the Agro-Industrial Complex of Russia. Ekonomichezkiy analiz: teoriya i praktika. Vol. 16. Is. 1. P. 19–35. DOI: 10.24891/ea.16.1.19

4. Castells M. (2000) The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Moscow: GU VShE.

5. Efremenko D.V., Dolgov A.Yu., Evseeva Ya.V. (2017) Russia between Systemic Catastrophes and Evolutionary Transformations: Aspects of Political Ontology. Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya. No. 5. P. 24–42. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2017.05.03

6. Eisenstadt S.N. (2000) Multiple Modernities. Daedalus. Vol. 129. No. 1. Р. 1–29.

7. Gavrov S., Klyukanov I. (2015) Modernization, Sociological Theories of. In: Wright J.D. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Elsevier. P. 707–713 . DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.32094-3

8. Glaz’yev S.Yu. (2018) Ryvok v budushchee. Rossiya v novyh technologicheskom i mirohosyajstvennom ukladah [A leap into the future. Russia in the new technological and global economic structures]. Moscow: Knizhnyy mir.

9. Gorshkov M.K., Kozyreva P.M., Li Peylin, Tihonova N.E. (eds.) (2016) “Ideal’noe obshchestvo” v mechtah lyudej v Rossii i v Kitae [The “ideal society” in the dreams of people in Russia and China]. Moscow: Novyy hronograf.

10. Grinin L.E., Korotaev A.V. (2010) Global’nyy krizis v retrospektive. Kratkaya istoriya pod”yemov i krizisov. Ot Likurga do Alana Grinspena [The global crisis in retrospect. A brief history of ups and downs. From Lycurgus to Alan Greenspan]. Moscow: Librokom.

11. Gundarov I.A., Ponomareva E.G., Levashova M.A., Gundarov B.I. (2020) Psihodemografiya. [Psychodemography]. Moscow: ATiSO.

12. Kadomtseva M.E. (2023) The Concept of Sustainable Development: The Evolution of Theoretical Approaches and Modern Vision. AlterEconomics. Vol. 20. No. 1. P. 166–188. DOI: 10.31063/AlterEconomics/2023.20-1.9

13. Mergel Th. (2012) Modernization. Mainz: Institut für Europäische Geschichte.

14. Nazarov V.P. Afinogenov D.A. (2022) Strategic Planning in Russia: A New Stage of Development. Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya. No. 4. P. 32–46. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.04.04

15. Rifkin D. (2014) The Third Industrial Revolution. How Lateral Power Is Transforming Energy, the Economy, and the World. Moscow: Al’pina-non-fikshn.

16. Schwab K. (2016) The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Moscow: Ekonomika.

17. Sorokin P. (1997) Glavnyye tendentsii nashego vremeni [The main trends of our time]. Moscow: Nauka, Rossiyskaya akademiya nauk, Institut sotsiologii.

18. Yakovets Yu.V., Akaev A.A. (2016) Perspektivy stanovleniya ustoychivogo mnogopolyarnogo miroustroystva na baze partnerstva tsivilizatsiy [Prospects for the formation of a sustainable multipolar world order based on the partnership of civilizations]. Moscow: MISK.

19. Zimina L.A. (1991) Alternativnost’ social’nogo rasvitiya kak problema teorii i politiki perestrojki [Alternative social development as a problem of theory and policy of perestroika]. Moscow.: Isdatel’stvo Moscovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta.


Review

For citations:


Shmakov V.I. Main Directions of Modern Transformation and Modernization of Russian Society, Ways to Overcome the Systemic Crisis in the Context of Technological Revolution: Alternative Strategic Development Models. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2024;(105):93-104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-105-2024-93-104

Views: 43

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2070-1381 (Online)