“Civilization State” Concept in the Works of Non-Western Scholars
https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-104(S)-2024-18-33
Abstract
The article discusses the main ideas and theories of non-Western countries researchers that reveal the concept of “civilization state”. As a methodological basis for the study of ideas developed within the framework of a non-Western tradition, the author uses the provisions of decolonial theory, allowing to overcome the clear and implicit dominance of attitudes and epistemological foundations inherent in European-American social science. The article draws attention to the critical perception of decolonial optics, which insists on the need to revise the epistemological foundations of Western thinking and the world order as a whole. The author analyzes the features of distribution and development of “civilization state” concept in a number of non-Western countries in the first quarter of the 21st century; the article presents a brief overview of emergence and evolution of the “civilization” concept, the diversity of semantic and conceptual variations of this concept is shown, the features of this process in the conditions of decolonization of knowledge were identified, an analysis of modern ideas and justification of the “civilization state” concept in China, India, Turkey, Egypt and in a number of African countries was carried out. The author draws conclusions that the concept of “civilization state”, being the Western origin concept, nevertheless, is perceived and develops within the framework of overcoming the West-centric theories of social development. In the conclusion the main advantages, threats and risks are presented that are associated with the adoption of the “civilization state” concept. Among the advantages are such as cultural and value consolidation of society; political mobilization; the basis for sovereignty and an independent policy; preservation and development of civilizational identity; the uniqueness of the civilization country as a source of further development. Challenges and risks include the following: the ambiguity of the new world order; contradictions between the concept of civilization and the concept of the national state; civilizational populism; ideas of isolationism; the risks of becoming the failed civilizational state. The article also recognizes the need for consolidated research work for the further theoretical development of the “civilization state” concept.
About the Author
R. V. Evstifeev
Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Roman V. Evstifeev, DSc(Political Sciences)
Moscow
References
1. Acharya A. (2020) The Myth of the “Civilization State”: Rising Powers and the Cultural Challenge to World Order. Ethics & International Affairs. Vol. 34. Is. 2. P. 139–156. DOI: 10.1017/S0892679420000192
2. Alexander T. (1996) Unravelling Global Apartheid: An Overview of World Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
3. Alitto G. (2023) The Uniqueness of Chinese Civilization in World History. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
4. Ardıç N. (2014) Civilizational Discourse, the “Alliance of Civilizations” and Turkish Foreign Policy. Insight Turkey. Vol. 16. Is. 3. P. 101–122.
5. Arjomand S.A., Tiryakian E.A. (eds.) (2004) Rethinking Civilizational Analysis. London: SAGE Publications.
6. Arnason J.P., Hann Ch. (eds.) (2018) Anthropology and Civilizational Analysis: Eurasian Explorations. Albany: State University of New York Press.
7. Behera N. (2021) C. Globalization, Deglobalization and Knowledge Production. International Affairs. Vol. 97. Is. 5. P. 1579–1597. DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiab119
8. Bello W. (2022) Deglobalization: Ideas for a New World Economy. London: Zed Books.
9. Benedikter R. (2021) What Is Re-Globalization? New Global Studies. Vol. 15. Is. 1. P. 73–84. DOI: 10.1515/ngs-2020-0051
10. Benedikter R., Gruber M., Kofler I. (eds.) (2022) Re-Globalization. New Frontiers of Political, Economic, and Social Globalization. New York: Routledge.
11. Benlahcene B. (2011) The Socio-Intellectual Foundations of Malek Bennabi’s Approach to Civilization. London — Washington: The international institute of Islamic thought.
12. Bennabi M. (2003) The Question of Culture. London — Washington: The International Institute of Islamic World.
13. Bennabi M. (2005) Les conditions de la renaissance. Problème d’une civilization. Alger: Editions ANEP.
14. Benveniste E. (1971) Civilization: A Contribution to the History of the Word. In: Meek M.E. (transl.) Problems in General Linguistics. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press. P. 289–296.
15. Bowden B. (2009) The Empire of Civilization: The Evolution of an Imperial Idea. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
16. Buhari D. (2023) The Myth of Deglobalization: Definitional and Methodological Issues. In: Steger M.B., Benedikter R., Pechlaner H., Kofler I. (eds.) Globalization: Past, Present, Future. Oakland: University of California Press. P. 74–89. DOI: 10.1525/9780520395770-007
17. Coker C. (2019) The Rise of the Civilizational State. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity.
18. Danilevskiy N.Ya. (2008) Rossiya i Evropa [Russia and Europe]. Moscow: TERRA —Knizhnyy klub.
19. Guizot F. (2007) Histoire générale de la civilisation en Europe. Mpscpw: Izdatel’skiy dom “Territoriya budushchego”.
20. Devisch R., Nyamnjoh F. (eds.) (2011) Postcolonial Turn: Re-Imagining Anthropology and Africa. Bamenda: Langaa RPCIG.
21. Durkheim E., Mauss M. (1971) Note on the Notion of Civilization. Social Research. Vol. 38. Is. 4. P. 808–813.
22. Eisenstadt S. (2000) Multiple Modernities. Daedalus. Vol. 129. Is. 1. P. 1–29.
23. Fanon F. (1967) Black Skin, White Masks. New York: Grove.
24. Febvre L. (1991) Combats pour l’histoire. Moscow: Nauka.
25. Fekete L. (2923) Civilisational Racism, Ethnonationalism and the Clash of Imperialisms in Ukraine. Race & Class. Vol. 64. Is. 4. P. 3–26. DOI: 10.1177/03063968231152093
26. Gallien C. (2020) A Decolonial Turn in the Humanities. Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics. Is. 40. P. 28–58.
27. Huntington S. (1997) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Touchstone.
28. Hardt M., Negri A. (2000) Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
29. Haug S., Roychoudhury S. (2023) Civilizational Exceptionalism in International Affairs: Making Sense of Indian and Turkish Claims. International Affairs. Vol. 99. Is. 2. P. 531–549. DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiac317
30. Hira S. (2023) Decolonizing the Mind. A Guide to Decolonial Theory and Practice. Hague: Amrit Publishers.
31. Jacques М. (2009) When China Rules the World: The End of the Western World and the Birth of a New Global Order. London: Penguin Books.
32. Kasantzev A.A., Sergeev V.M. (2020) The Crisis of US-centric Globalization: Causes, Trends and Scenarios of Development. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 40–69. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2020-2-71-40-69
33. Kim H., Li P., Lee Y. (2020) Observations of Deglobalization against Globalization and Impacts on Global Business. International Trade, Politics and Development. Vol. 4. Is. 2. P. 83–103. DOI: 10.1108/itpd-05-2020-0067
34. Kislenko I.Y. (2022) On Colonial Episteme and Decolonial Sociology (Discussing the Canonization of W.E.B. Du Bois). Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya. No. 7. P. 3–14. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250021240-7
35. Kumar K. (2014) The Return of Civilization — and of Arnold Toynbee. Comparative Studies in Society and History. Vol. 56. Is. 4. P. 815–843. DOI: 10.1017/S0010417514000413
36. Linklater A. (2021) The Idea of Civilization and the Making of the Global Order. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
37. Mauss M. (1968) Les Fonctions sociales du sacré. Oeuvres Paris: Editions de Minuit. Vol. 2.
38. Meghji A. (2021) Decolonizing Sociology: An Introduction. New York: John Wiley&Sons.
39. Novy A. (2022) The Political Trilemma of Contemporary Social-Ecological Transformation. Globalizations. Vol. 19. Is. 1. P. 59–80. DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2020.1850073
40. Olivié I., Gracia M. (2020) Is This the End of Globalization (As We Know It). Globalizations. Vol. 17. Is. 6. P. 990–1007. DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2020.1716923
41. Palabıyık M. (2023) A Genealogy of the Concept of Civilization (Medeniyet) in Ottoman Political Thought: A Homegrown Perception? All Azimuth. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 129–146. DOI: 10.20991/allazimuth.1177305
42. Paul T.V. (2021) Globalization, Deglobalization and Reglobalization: Adapting Liberal International Order. International Affairs. Vol. 97. Is. 5. P. 1599–1620. DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiab072
43. Radcliffe S. (2022) Decolonizing Geography. An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
44. Rückert H. (1857) Lehrbuch der Weltgeschichte in organischer Darstellung. Bd. 1–2. Leipzig: Weigel.
45. Santos B. (2007) Beyond Abyssal Thinking: From Global Lines to Ecologies of Knowledges. Review (Fernand Braudel Center). Vol. 30. Is. 1. P. 45–89.
46. Santos B. (2016) Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. New York: Routledge.
47. Sergeev V.M., Kuzmin A.S., Nechayev V.D., Alekseyenkova E.S., Kazantsev A.A., Dozhdikov A.V., Evstifeyev R.V., Usmanov S.M., Chernyshov S.V., Fyodorova I.M., Khomutova O.Yu., Spengler O. (1980) Der Untergang des Abendlandes: Umrisse einer Morphologie der Weltgeschichte. München: C.H. Beck.
48. Spiridonova V.I. (2022) Civilizational State’ as a Challenge to Unipolar Globalization. Vek globalizatsii. No. 1(41). P. 29–42. DOI: 10.30884/vglob/2022.01.02
49. Táíwò O. (2022a) Elite Capture: How the Powerful Took Over Identity Politics (and Everything Else). London: Pluto Press.
50. Táíwò O. (2022b) Against Decolonisation. Taking African Agency Seriously. London: C. Hurst & Co.
51. Therborn G. (2021) States, Nations, and Civilizations. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. Is. 14. P. 225–242. DOI: 10.17863/CAM.66847
52. Toynbee A. (1947) A Study of History. Abridgement of vols. I–VI by D.C. Somervell. London: Oxford University Press.
53. Tylor E. (1981) Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Language, Art, and Custom. 2 vols. London: John Murray.
54. Velizhev M.B. (2012) Tsivilizatsiya i sredniy klass [Civilization and middle class]. In: Ponyatiya o Rossii: K istoricheskoy semantike imperskogo perioda. V 2-kh tomakh. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye. Vol. 1. P. 250–292.
55. Vinogradova S.A. (2007) The “Choir” of the Moscow “Gateway” and Scenarios of Its Development. Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya. No. 2. P. 44–62. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2007.02.04
56. Volodin A.G. (2022) India as a Civilizational State. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Vol. 92. Suppl. 9. P. S827–S837. DOI: 10.1134/S1019331622150102
57. Weber M. (1978) Die Protestantische Ethik: Kritiken und Antikritiken. Guetersloh: Guetersloher Verlagshaus.
58. Wood D.A. (2020) Epistemic Decolonization. A Critical Investigation into the Anticolonial Politics of Knowledge. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
59. Xia G. (2014) China as a “Civilization-State”: A Historical and Comparative Interpretation. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences. Is. 140. P. 43–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.384
60. Yu M. (2022) Escape from Civilization’s Predicaments. Telos. Is. 201. P. 51–61. DOI: 10.3817/1222201051
61. Zhang W. (2012) The China Wave. Rise of a Civilizational State. Shanghai: World Century.
62. Zhang W. (2016) The China Horizon: Glory and Dream of a Civilizational State. Shanghai: Fudan University, China & Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences.
Review
For citations:
Evstifeev R.V. “Civilization State” Concept in the Works of Non-Western Scholars. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2024;1(104):18-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-104(S)-2024-18-33
Views:
47
JATS XML
Email this article 