Historical Policy in the Post-Soviet Space (on the Example of the Memory of the Great Patriotic War) in the Context of Modern Geopolitical Transformations
https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-113(S)-2025-54-65
Abstract
Modern historical revisionism in the post-Soviet space has become a direct consequence of the geopolitical changes and the accompanying historical revisionism and revanchism which are typical to the unfriendly states of the collective West. As the economic and military-political balance in the world changed, and a new group of dynamically developing countries took the leading positions, the transformation of the Western-centric world order established after the end of the Cold War became inevitable. Against the background of growing geopolitical competition between Russia on the one hand and the United States and its allies in NATO and the European Union on the other the latter actively supported attempts to split the historical memory of the peoples of the former Soviet Union, the cementing element of which was the common Victory in the Great Patriotic War. This trend became more and more evident as NATO and the EU expanded eastward. An analysis of the causes and nature, as well as the tools of Western influence on historical politics in the post-Soviet space, proves a direct link between the memory wars and the international situation and the geopolitical goals of external players. All Western educational and scientific projects related to historical, cultural and other humanitarian issues are based in one way or another on the narratives of decommunization and the so-called decolonization of the post-Soviet space, ultimately demonizing the images of the USSR and modern Russia and the historical role of Russian civilization, including the period of the World War II. The rewriting of history through the promotion of historical falsifications plays into the hands of aggressive revanchist circles of unfriendly Western states seeking to maintain their dominance and sever the cultural and civilizational unity of the space of Russian civilization and its closest neighbours.
About the Author
A. S. Levchenkov
Institute of Eurasian and Oriental Studies, Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander S. Levchenkov, PhD, Associate Professor
Moscow
References
1. Belov S.I. (2022) State Politics of Memory in Ukraine After the Euromaidan. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn’. No. 3. P. 28–35.
2. Bobrovsky A.S. (2021) Historical Memory and the St. George Ribbon in Modern Politics in the Post-Soviet Space. Vestnik MNEPU. No. 2. P. 277–279.
3. Boikov S. (2021) Vliyaniye istoricheskoy politiki stran Baltii na otnosheniya Rossii i Evrosoyuza [The influence of the historical policy of the Baltic States on relations between Russia and the European Union]. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn’. No. 9. URL: https://interaffairs.ru/jauthor/material/2562
4. Davies N. (2006) Europe at War 1939–1945: No Simple Victory. New York: Macmillan.
5. Demurin D.M. (2025) I vnov’ prodolzhayetsya boy! Istoricheskiy revizionizm Zapada i podgotovka k novoy voyne [And the battle continues again! Historical revisionism of the West and preparations for a new war]. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn’. No. 5. P. 14–21.
6. Glantz D. (1986) American Perspectives on Eastern Front Operations in World War. Fort Leavenworth: DTIC.
7. Glukharev N.N. (2015) To the Issue of the Place of the Soviet-German Front of the Second World War in the British and American Historiography. Lokus: lyudi, obshchestvo, kul’tury i smysly. No. 4. P. 59–73.
8. Grozin A.V. (2025) The Great Patriotic War of 1941–1945 in the Historical Politics of the Central Asian Republics. Part I. Postsovetskiy materik. No. 1(45). P. 31–49. DOI: 10.48137/23116412_2025_1_31
9. Ioffe G.V. (2020) O natsional’noy pamyati belorusov [On the national memory of Belarusians]. In: Politika pamyati v sovremennoy Rossii i stranakh Vostochnoy Evropy. Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Evropeyskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge. P. 438–482.
10. Korotyshev A.V., Brunova N.V., Goryachev Yu.A., Omelchenko E.A., Shevtsova A.A. (eds.) (2024) Obrazovaniye s russkoyazychnym komponentom za rubezhom: sostoyaniye i vozmozhnosti dlya razvitiya [Education with a Russian-speaking component abroad: The state and opportunities for development]. Moscow: Etnosfera.
11. Kozlov S.V. (2014) Politika pamyati kak instrument legitimatsii postsovetskoy ukrainskoy gosudarstvennosti [Politics of memory as a tool for legitimizing post-Soviet Ukrainian statehood]. Vestnik Rossiyskoy natsii. No. 1(33). P. 122–132.
12. Kurbatova A.G. (2024) Memorial Symbols of Historical Heritage in Educational Projects of the European Association of History Teachers (EuroClio). Istoricheskiy zhurnal: nauchnyye issledovaniya. No. 5. P. 104–118. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0609.2024.5.71916
13. Larionov A.E. (2021) Power and Memory: Soviet Past in the Historical Politics of the Post-Soviet Regimes. Vlast’. No. 6. P. 173–177. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v29i6.8710
14. Levchenkov A.S. (2021) Historical Revisionism and the Memory of the Great Patriotic War in the Geopolitical Confrontation on the Western Flank of the Post-Soviet Space. Postsovetskie issledovaniya. No. 7. P. 581–590.
15. Miller A.I. (2019) Growth of the Significance of Institutional Factor in Politics of Memory — Causes and Implications. Politiya. No. 3(94). P. 87–102. DOI: 10.30570/2078-5089-2019-94-3-87-102
16. Nemensky O.B. (2024) The Law and Justice Party’s “History Policy” during 2015–2019. Problemy natsional’noy strategii. No. 1(82). P. 180–205. DOI: 10.52311/2079-3359_2024_1_180
17. Prôčková F. (1997) Historical-Political Reflection on the Movement in the Post-Soviet Space. Czech Journal of International Relations. Vol. 32. Is. 1. P. 89–95. DOI: 10.32422/cjir.1268
18. Sikharulidze A.T. (2022) From “Countering” to “Constructing” Russian Threats in Mikheil Saakashvili’s Georgia. Mezhdunarodnaya analitika. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 59–78. DOI: 10.46272/2587-8476-2022-13-2-59-78
19. Siminday V.V. (2015) Ognem, shtykom i lest’yu. Mirovyye voyny i ikh natsionalisticheskaya interpretatsiya v Pribaltike [With fire, bayonet and flattery. World Wars and their nationalist interpretation in the Baltic States]. Moscow: Fond “Istoricheskaya pamyat’”.
20. Wolfe T.C. (2006) Past as Present, Myth, or History? Discourses of Time and the Great Fatherland War. In: Lebow R.N., Kansteiner W., Fogu C. (eds.) The Politics of Memory in Postwar Europe. Durham, London: Duke University Press. P. 249–283.
21. Ziemke E. (1968) Stalingrad to Berlin. The German Defeat in the East. Washington: Office of the Chief of Military History, U.S. Army.
22. Zverev K.A. (2024) Holidays and Memorable Dates as an Instrument of the Historical Policy of the Baltic States. Peterburgskiy istoricheskiy zhurnal. No. 3(43). P. 164–174. DOI: 10.51255/2311-603X_2024_3_164
Review
For citations:
Levchenkov A.S. Historical Policy in the Post-Soviet Space (on the Example of the Memory of the Great Patriotic War) in the Context of Modern Geopolitical Transformations. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2025;(113(S)):54-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-113(S)-2025-54-65
Views:
39
JATS XML
Email this article 