The Organizational Support That Encourages Employees-Applicants of Research Organizations to Defend Scientific Papers
https://doi.org/10.24412/2070-1381-2023-99-205-232
Abstract
In recent years, the development of human scientific potential has become an important part of the overall strategy of the Rosatom State Atomic Energy Corporation. The concentration of efforts on breakthrough areas of research in various areas of the high-tech nuclear industry means the continuous growth of research achievements of employees, encouraging them to write and defend dissertations. However, such a change in the role of scientific knowledge and technology requires not only managerial will (although it is certainly necessary), but also the solution of a number of related organizational problems, as well as the training of qualified personnel.
The main issue, especially in a rapidly changing global world, is the degree of respect for science as a field of professional activity in Russian society.
The results presented in the article are a continuation of the research, provided by the authors earlier, on incentives for writing and defending dissertations. They are aimed at finding and defining effective organizational actions focused on increasing the interest of Rosatom employees in applying for academic degrees. The authors made an attempt to identify the most effective organizational support measures that stimulate interest in the scientific activities of employees, as well as the reasons for the decline in activity in the field of dissertation defense.
About the Authors
T. V. ZaytsevaRussian Federation
Tatiana V. Zaytseva, DSc (Economics), Professor, Deputy Head of Department
School of Public Administration; Human Resource Management Department
Moscow
A. A. Suvorova
Russian Federation
Anna A. Suvorova, Expert, Advisor
project office for the Development of equipment, technologies and scientific research comprehensive program; Joint-stock company “Science
and Innovations”
Moscow
References
1. Artyukhina A.I., Chizhova V.M., Chumakov V.I. (2022) Personalized Pedagogical Learning of Highly Qualified Residents and Postgraduate Students. Kardiovaskulyarnaya terapiya i profilaktika. Vol. 21. No. S1. DOI: 10.15829/1728-8800-2022-3160
2. Babaev B.D., Chekmarev V.V., Smolyaninova Yu.V. (2012) Post-Graduate, Doctoral, Soiskatelstvo as Institutions: Public Demand for. Ekonomika obrazovaniya. No. 2. P. 111–115.
3. Bagdasaryan N.G., Balueva T.V., Krupa O.V. (2020) Postgraduate Student and His Dissertation: Potential and Risks of Defense. Vestnik gosudarstvennogo universiteta “Dubna”, Seriya: Nauki o cheloveke o obshchestve. No. 3. P. 3–18. DOI: 10.37005/2687-0231-2020-0-9-3-18
4. Bednyi B.I., Mironos A.A., Rybakov N.V. (2019) Doctoral Education as an Institutional Resource for Training Research and Higher Education Personnel. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. Vol. 28. No. 8–9. P. 44–54. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-8-9-44-54
5. Bednyi B.I., Chuprunov E.V. (2019) Modern Doctoral Education in Russia: Current Directions of Development. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. Vol. 28. No. 3. P. 9–20. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-3-9-20
6. Gatfield T. (2005) An Investigation into PhD Supervisory Management Styles: Development of a Dynamic Conceptual Model and Its Managerial Implications. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. Vol. 27. Is. 3. Р. 311–325. DOI: 10.1080/13600800500283585
7. Gess-Newsome J., Taylor J., Carlson J., Gardner A.L., Wilson Ch.D., Stuhlsatz M.A.M. (2019) Teacher Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Practice, and Student Achievement. International Journal of Science Education. Vol. 41. Is. 7. P. 944–963. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1265158
8. Golikov A.I., Ignatiev V.P., Nikolaev P.N. (2022) Ways to Modernize Postgraduate Studies at the Federal University. Vyssheye obrazovaniye segodnya. No. 1–2. P. 18–25. DOI: 10.18137/RNU.HET.22.01-02.P.018
9. Hasgall A., Saenen B., Borrell-Damian L. (2019) Doctoral Education in Europe Today: Approaches and Institutional Structures. Available at: https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/online%20eua%20cde%20survey%2016.01.2019.pdf
10. Kandybovich S.L., Rasina T.V. (2018) The Situation of Uncertainty after the Thesis Defense and Its Influences on the Mental Health of Scientific Staff. Innovatsionnyye tekhnologii v farmatsii: Materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiyem, posvyashchennoy pamyati dotsenta Peshkovoy V.A. Irkutsk: Irkutskiy gosudarstvennyy meditsinskiy universitet,Irkutsk. Vol. 5. P. 345–351.
11. Krasinskaya L.F., Klimova A.S. (2020). Doctoral Programs Are in Anticipation of Change: Postgraduates and Their Scientific Supervisors’ Readiness. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. Vol. 29. No. 3. P. 24–36. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-3-24-36
12. Korchagin E.A., Safin R.S. (2019) Educational Component of Doctoral Training at Engineering University. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. Vol. 28. No. 3. P. 67–74. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-3-67-74
13. Kotlyarova I.O., Serikov G.N. (2018) Partnership of the Agents of Education Process in Continuing Research Activity of Doctoral Students. Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya «Obrazovaniye. Pedagogicheskiye nauki». Vol. 10. No. 2. P. 6–16. DOI: 10.14529/ped180201
14. Mardakhaev L.V. (2016) Thesis and the Thesis Activities Applicant. Tsentr innovatsionnykh tekhnologiy i sotsial’noy ekspertizy. No. 5(9). Available at: http://ma123.su/_ld/3/338_JMH.pdf
15. Matushansky G.U., Zavada G.V., Matushanskaya Yu.G. (2019) Barriers Impeding Postgraduate Training Completion and Dissertation Submission and Defense. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii Vol. 28. No. 8–9. P. 55–66. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-8-9-55-66
16. Mironos A.A., Bednyi B.I., Rybakov N.V. (2017) Academic Careers in the Spectrum of Postgraduate Students’ Professional Preferences. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz. Vol. 21. No. 3. P. 74–84.
17. Moskvin V.N. (2015) Prospects for the Use of Intellectual Property In The Preparation of PhD and Master Theses in the Field of “Land Management and Cadaster”. Vestnik Sibirskoy gosudarstvennoy geodezicheskoy akademii. No. 3(31), P. 151–158.
18. Murphy N., Bain J.D., Conrad L.M. (2007) Orientations to Research Higher Degree Supervision. Higher Education. Vol. 53. Р. 209–234. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-005-5608-9
19. Obzhorin A.M. (2017) The Problems of Popularization of Science in Russia. Nauchnaya periodika: problemy i resheniya. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 117–125. DOI: 10.18334/nppir.7.2.37947
20. Osipov P.N. (2021) Writing and Defending a Thesis: The Value of Barriers. Pedagogika i psikhologiya obrazovaniya. No. 3. P. 105–118. DOI: 10.31862/2500-297X-2021-3-105-118
21. Pakhomov S.I., Kubyshko V.L., Konev A.N. (eds.) (2018) Strategiya i praktika dostizheniya vysshey kvalifikatsii sub”yektom innovatsionnogo truda [Strategy and practice of achieving the highest qualification by the subject of innovative labor]. Moscow: KT “Buki-Vedi”.
22. Popova N.G., Biricheva E.V. (2017) Training Young Researchers at the Postgraduate Level: In Search of a Goal. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. No. 1. P. 5–14.
23. Reznik S.D., Chemezov I.S. (2018) Postgraduate Education in Russian Universities: State, Problems and Prospects of Development. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. No. 430. P. 159–168. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/430/22
24. Rybakov N.V. (2018) A New Model of Russian Postgraduate Education: Pilot Study of the First Graduation of PhD Students. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. Vol. 27. No. 7. P. 86–95. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-7-86-95
25. Seagram B.C., Gould J., Pyke W. (1998) An Investigation of Gender and Other Variables on Time to Completion of Doctoral Degrees. Research in Higher Education. Vol. 39. Р. 319–335.
26. Sinclair M. (2004) The Pedagogy of ‘Good’ PhD Supervision: A National Crosshdisciplinary Investigation of PhD Supervision. Canberra: Australian Government, Department of Education, Science and Training.
27. Sokolov A.Yu. (2022) On Improving the Legal Regulation of Attachment for the Preparation of a Dissertation for a Candidate of Science Outside of Postgraduate Studies. Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn. No. 4. P. 32–39. DOI: 10.24412/1608-8794-2022-4-32-39
28. Vladimirov I.A. (2022) The Social Mechanism of the Functioning of the Institute of Postgraduate Studies in Contemporary Russia. Gumanitarnye Nauki. Vestnik Finasovogo Universiteta. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 153–160. DOI: 10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-1-153-160
29. Voronov A.S. (2020) Development of Young People Research Potential and Popularization of Science аmong Schoolchildren, Students and Young Scientists in Russia. Gosudarstvennoe uprevlenie. Electronny vestnik. No. 78. P. 198–228. DOI: 10.24411/2070-1381-2020-10040
30. Zagvyazinsky V.I. (2015) Concerning the Social Importance and a Demand of Pedagogical Researches. Obrazovaniye i nauka. No. 8(127). P. 4–19. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2015-7-4-19
31. Zaytseva T.V., Suvorova А.А. (2023) Motivational Factors for Writing and Defending Scientific Papers. Gosudarstvennoe uprevlenie. Electronny vestnik. No. 96. P. 198–228. DOI: 10.24412/2070-1381-2023-96
32. Zerchaninova T.E., Tarbeeva I.S. (2019) Problems of Scientific and Educational Activities of Postgraduate Students. Nauchnyy rezul’tat. Seriya: Sotsiologiya i upravleniye. Vol. 5. No. 3. P. 37–48. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2019-5-3-0-3
33. Zerchaninova T.E., Tarbeeva I.S. (2020) The Role of an Academic Advisor in the Scientific and Educational Activities of a Postgraduate Student. Nauchnyy rezul’tat. Seriya: Sotsiologiya i upravleniye. Vol. 6. No. 2. P. 145–158. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2020-6-2-0-10
34. Zyryanov V.V. (2019) Research Supervisor: Between the Challenges of Time and the Realities of Higher Education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. Vol. 28. No. 10. P. 25–37. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-10-25-37
Review
For citations:
Zaytseva T.V., Suvorova A.A. The Organizational Support That Encourages Employees-Applicants of Research Organizations to Defend Scientific Papers. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2023;(99):205-232. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2070-1381-2023-99-205-232
JATS XML
