Algorithmization of Management Processes in Gig Economy
https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-102-2024-168-182
Abstract
The article presents the results of the research dealing with the main features of algorithmic technologies application in the implementation of management processes in organizations. It is revealed that the algorithmization of the management processes is used by the companies functioning in the field of the gig economy, but this trend is gradually spreading to other organizations. The article defines the main content of the algorithmic management process in the gig economy. It is indicated that in the gig economy, the construction of labour relations is regulated by algorithmic management, which is a management system implemented by selflearning algorithms that make decisions regarding interaction with gig workers. Algorithmic management makes it possible to automate managerial decision-making processes, track the behavior of gig workers, evaluate their effectiveness, establish principles of interaction between them and the digital platform, and increase the transparency of socio-economic relations. The characteristics are revealed, the structure is presented, and the implications of algorithmic management as an approach to managing organisational innovation are noted. The study found that the considered process regards the organization reform of the company as the key factor of its strategic development and the digital platforms as the tool for cooptation, control, providing incentive and feedback for the gig workers on the basis of confidence-building (loyalty) between the subjects. It should be noted that the use of algorithms in gig economy organisations has a certain impact on gig workers, who can adapt to this trend, express their disagreement or even stop working on the platform. Furthermore, several suggestions on the sustainable development of the gig economy organizations are made. The research confirms the necessity to build the paradigm of the algorithmic responsibility management in order to avoid the company misconduct and to safeguard the rights and interests of the gig economy stakeholders. The key directions for future research are outlined which can extend the scope of algorithmic technologies implementation.
About the Authors
A. V. GavrilyukRussian Federation
Artyom V. Gavrilyuk, PhD, Associate Professor, School of Public Administration
Moscow
A. Zhao
Russian Federation
Zhao Anran, Postgraduate student, School of Public Administration
Moscow
References
1. Boyd D., Crawford K. (2021) Critical Questions for Big Data: Provocations for a Cultural, Technological, and Scholarly Phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society. Vol. 15. Is. 5. P. 662–679. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
2. Cannon S., Summers L.H. (2014) How Uber and the Sharing Economy Can Win over Regulators. Harvard Business Review. Vol. 13. Is. 10. P. 24–28.
3. CormenT.H., Leiserson C.E., Rivest R.L., Stein C. (2022) Introduction to Algorithms. Cambridge: MIT Press.
4. Duggan J., Sherman U., Carbery R., McDonnell A. (2020) Algorithmic Management and App-Work in the Gig Economy: A Research Agenda for Employment Relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal. Vol. 30. Is. 1. P. 114–132. DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.12258
5. Elbanna A., Idowu A. (2022) Crowdwork, Digital Liminality and the Enactment of Culturally Recognised Alternatives to Western Precarity: Beyond Epistemological Terra Nullius. European Journal of Information Systems. Vol. 31. Is. 1. P. 128–144. DOI: 10.1080/0960085X.2021.1981779
6. Eubanks V. (2018) Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Ferrari F., Graham M. (2021) Fissures in Algorithmic Power: Platforms, Code, and Contestation. Cultural Studies. Vol. 35. Is. 4–5. P. 814–832. DOI: 10.1080/09502386.2021.1895250
7. Gerstel N., Clawson D. (2018) Control over Time: Employers, Workers, and Families Shaping Work Schedules. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 44. P. 77–97. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041400
8. Gol E.S., Stein M.-K., Avital M. (2019) Crowdwork Platform Governance toward Organizational Value Creation. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. Vol. 28. Is. 2. P. 175–195. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.001
9. Jago A.S. (2019) Algorithms and Authenticity. Academy of Management Discoveries. Vol. 5. Is. 1. P. 38–56. DOI: 10.5465/amd.2017.0002
10. Jarrahi M.H., Sutherland W., Nelson S.B., Sawyer S. (2020) Platformic Management, Boundary Resources for Gig Work, and Worker Autonomy. Computer Supported Cooperative Work-the Journal of Collaborative Computing and Work Practices. Vol. 29. Is. 1–2. P. 153–189. DOI: 10.1007/s10606-019-09368-7
11. Jialiang P., Shanshi L., Xun C., Jiaojiao Qu. (2021) Perceived Algorithmic Control of Gig Workers: Conceptualization, Measurement and Verification the Impact on Service Performance. Nankai Management Review. Vol. 24. Is. 6. P. 14–27.
12. Kellogg K.C., Valentine M.A. Christin A. (2020) Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control. Academy of Management Annals. Vol. 14. Is. 1. P. 366–410. DOI: 10.5465/annals.2018.0174
13. Kovalenko A.I. (2020) Network Effect as a Sign of Dominating Position of Digital Platforms. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya. No. 1(77). P. 18–37. DOI: 10.37791/1993-7598-2020-14-1-18-37
14. Lepri B., Oliver N., Letouzé E., Pentland A., Vinck P. (2018) Fair, Transparent, and Accountable Algorithmic Decision-Making Processes: The Premise, the Proposed Solutions, and the Open Challenges. Philosophy & Technology. Vol. 31. Is. 1. P. 611–627. DOI: 10.1007/s13347-017-0279-x
15. Linets A.A. (2021) Legal Nature of Relations Arising in Connection with the Performence of Personal Labor within the Gig-Economy. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11: Pravo. No. 5. P. 47–69.
16. Litovchenko O.V. (2020) Gig-Economy as a New Model of Labor Relations. Voprosy ustoychivogo razvitiya obshchestva. No. 9. P. 130–136. DOI: 10.34755/IROK.2020.14.17.017
17. Meijerink J., Keegan A. (2019) Conceptualizing Human Resource Management in the Gig Economy toward a Platform Ecosystem Perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology. Vol. 34. Is. 4. P. 214–232. DOI: 10.1108/JMP-07-2018-0277
18. Panteli N., Rapti A., Scholarios D. (2020) “If He Just Knew Who We Were”: Microworkers’ Emerging Bonds of Attachment in a Fragmented Employment Relationship. Work Employment and Society. Vol. 34. Is. 3. P. 476–494. DOI: 10.1177/0950017019897872
19. Parth Sh., Bathini D.R. (2021) Microtargeting Control: Explicating Algorithmic Control and Nudges in Platform-Mediated Cab Driving in India. New Technology Work and Employment. Vol. 36. Is. 1. P. 74–93. DOI: 10.1111/ntwe.12188
20. Romanets I.I. Verbovskii G.D. (2021) Gig-Economy as a New Form of Markets Relations. Innovatsionnaya ekonomika: perspektivy razvitiya i sovershenstvovaniya. No. 1(51). P. 186–192. DOI: 10.47581/2021/FA-07/IE/51/01.029
21. Tóth Z., Nemkova E., Hizsák G., Naudé P. (2022) Social Capital Creation On Professional Sharing Economy Platforms: The Problems of Rating Dependency and the Non-Transferability of Social Capital. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 144. P. 450–460. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.090
22. Varavva M.Yu. Lazareva O.S. (2022) Platform Gig-Economy as Alternative Model with Non-standard Labor Relations. Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G.V. Plekhanova. No. 5(125). P. 108–115. DOI: 10.21686/2413-2829-2022-5-108-115
23. Veen A., Barratt T., Goods C. (2020) Platform-Capital’s ‘App-etite’ for Control: A Labour Process Analysis of Food-Delivery Work in Australia. Work Employment and Society. Vol. 34. Is. 3. P. 388–406. DOI: 10.1177/0950017019836911
24. Zuboff S. (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile books.
Review
For citations:
Gavrilyuk A.V., Zhao A. Algorithmization of Management Processes in Gig Economy. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2024;(102):168-182. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-102-2024-168-182
JATS XML
