<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">gosupr</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Государственное управление. Электронный вестник</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Public Administration. E-journal (Russia)</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2070-1381</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Факультет государственного управления МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.55959/MSU2070-1381-102-2024-168-182</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">gosupr-107</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СТРАТЕГИЯ ЦИФРОВОЙ ЭКОНОМИКИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>DIGITAL ECONOMY STRATEGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Алгоритмизация процессов управления в гиг-экономике</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Algorithmization of Management Processes in Gig Economy</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3583-6698</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гаврилюк</surname><given-names>А. В</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Gavrilyuk</surname><given-names>A. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Гаврилюк Артём Владимирович, Кандидат экономических наук, доцент</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Artyom V. Gavrilyuk, PhD, Associate Professor, School of Public Administration</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">Gavriliuk@spa.msu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3230-8184</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Чжао</surname><given-names>А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Чжао Аньжань, Аспирант, Факультет государственного управления</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Zhao Anran, Postgraduate student, School of Public Administration</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">anran.zhao@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>05</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>102</issue><fpage>168</fpage><lpage>182</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Гаврилюк А.В., Чжао А., 2026</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Гаврилюк А.В., Чжао А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Gavrilyuk A.V., Zhao A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.spajournal.ru/jour/article/view/107">https://www.spajournal.ru/jour/article/view/107</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье представлены результаты исследования особенностей применения алгоритмических технологий в организациях для реализации управленческих процессов. Показано, что алгоритмизацию процессов управления используют компании, функционирующие в сфере гиг-экономики, однако данная тенденция постепенно распространяется на остальные субъекты. В статье определено содержание процесса алгоритмического управления в гиг-экономике. Обозначено, что в гиг-экономике выстраивание трудовых отношений регулируется алгоритмическим управлением, которое представляет собой систему управления, реализуемую самообучающимися алгоритмами, принимающими решения относительно взаимодействия с работниками. Алгоритмическое управление позволяет автоматизировать процессы принятия управленческих решений, отслеживать поведение работников, осуществлять оценку их эффективности, устанавливать порядок взаимодействия работников с цифровой платформой, а также повышать прозрачность социально-экономических отношений. В ходе анализа раскрыты особенности, представлена структура и отмечены последствия алгоритмического управления как подхода к управлению организационными инновациями. В результате выполненного исследования было установлено, что рассматриваемый процесс определяет организационную реформу компании в качестве основного фактора стратегического развития и цифровые платформы в виде инструмента для кооптации, контроля, стимулирования и обратной связи гиг-работников на основе установления доверия (лояльности) между субъектами. Отмечено, что применение алгоритмов в организациях гиг-экономики оказывает определенное влияние на гиг-работников, которые могут адаптироваться к данной тенденции, выразить несогласие или вовсе прекратить работу на платформе. Кроме того, в статье выдвигаются предложения по устойчивому развитию организаций гиг-экономики и подчеркивается необходимость выстраивания парадигмы управления алгоритмической ответственностью во избежание неправомерности действий и для защиты прав и интересов всех заинтересованных сторон в гиг-экономике. Изложены ключевые направления будущих исследований, которые могут расширить механизмы применения алгоритмических технологий.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article presents the results of the research dealing with the main features of algorithmic technologies application in the implementation of management processes in organizations. It is revealed that the algorithmization of the management processes is used by the companies functioning in the field of the gig economy, but this trend is gradually spreading to other organizations. The article defines the main content of the algorithmic management process in the gig economy. It is indicated that in the gig economy, the construction of labour relations is regulated by algorithmic management, which is a management system implemented by selflearning algorithms that make decisions regarding interaction with gig workers. Algorithmic management makes it possible to automate managerial decision-making processes, track the behavior of gig workers, evaluate their effectiveness, establish principles of interaction between them and the digital platform, and increase the transparency of socio-economic relations. The characteristics are revealed, the structure is presented, and the implications of algorithmic management as an approach to managing organisational innovation are noted. The study found that the considered process regards the organization reform of the company as the key factor of its strategic development and the digital platforms as the tool for cooptation, control, providing incentive and feedback for the gig workers on the basis of confidence-building (loyalty) between the subjects. It should be noted that the use of algorithms in gig economy organisations has a certain impact on gig workers, who can adapt to this trend, express their disagreement or even stop working on the platform. Furthermore, several suggestions on the sustainable development of the gig economy organizations are made. The research confirms the necessity to build the paradigm of the algorithmic responsibility management in order to avoid the company misconduct and to safeguard the rights and interests of the gig economy stakeholders. The key directions for future research are outlined which can extend the scope of algorithmic technologies implementation.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Алгоритм</kwd><kwd>алгоритмизация процессов управления</kwd><kwd>алгоритмическая власть</kwd><kwd>алгоритмическая ответственность</kwd><kwd>гиг-экономика</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Algorithm</kwd><kwd>algorithmization of management processes</kwd><kwd>algorithmic power</kwd><kwd>algorithmic responsibility</kwd><kwd>gig economy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Варавва М.Ю. Лазарева О.С. Платформенная гиг-экономика — альтернативная модель с нестандартными трудовыми отношениями // Вестник Российского экономического университета имени Г.В. Плеханова. 2022. № 5(125). С. 108–115. DOI: 10.21686/2413-2829-2022-5-108-115</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Boyd D., Crawford K. (2021) Critical Questions for Big Data: Provocations for a Cultural, Technological, and Scholarly Phenomenon. Information, Communication &amp; Society. Vol. 15. Is. 5. P. 662–679. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Коваленко А.И. Сетевой эффект как признак доминирующего положения цифровых платформ // Современная конкуренция. 2020. № 1(77). С. 18–37. DOI: 10.37791/1993-7598-2020-14-1-18-37</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cannon S., Summers L.H. (2014) How Uber and the Sharing Economy Can Win over Regulators. Harvard Business Review. Vol. 13. Is. 10. P. 24–28.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Линец А.А. Правовая природа отношений, возникающих в связи с исполнением личного труда в рамках гиг-экономики // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 11: Право. 2021. № 5. С. 47–69.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">CormenT.H., Leiserson C.E., Rivest R.L., Stein C. (2022) Introduction to Algorithms. Cambridge: MIT Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Литовченко О.В. Гиг-экономика как новая модель трудовых отношений // Вопросы устойчивого развития общества. 2020. № 9. С. 130–136. DOI: 10.34755/IROK.2020.14.17.017</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Duggan J., Sherman U., Carbery R., McDonnell A. (2020) Algorithmic Management and App-Work in the Gig Economy: A Research Agenda for Employment Relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal. Vol. 30. Is. 1. P. 114–132. DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.12258</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Романец И.И. Вербовский Г.Д. Гиг-экономика как новая форма рыночных отношений // Инновационная экономика: перспективы развития и совершенствования. 2021. № 1(51). С. 186–192. DOI: 10.47581/2021/FA-07/IE/51/01.029</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Elbanna A., Idowu A. (2022) Crowdwork, Digital Liminality and the Enactment of Culturally Recognised Alternatives to Western Precarity: Beyond Epistemological Terra Nullius. European Journal of Information Systems. Vol. 31. Is. 1. P. 128–144. DOI: 10.1080/0960085X.2021.1981779</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boyd D., Crawford K. Critical Questions for Big Data: Provocations for a Cultural, Technological, and Scholarly Phenomenon // Information, Communication &amp; Society. 2012. Vol. 15. Is. 5. P. 662–679. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Eubanks V. (2018) Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Ferrari F., Graham M. (2021) Fissures in Algorithmic Power: Platforms, Code, and Contestation. Cultural Studies. Vol. 35. Is. 4–5. P. 814–832. DOI: 10.1080/09502386.2021.1895250</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cannon S., Summers L.H. How Uber and the Sharing Economy Can Win over Regulators // Harvard Business Review. 2014. Vol. 13. Is. 10. P. 24–28.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gerstel N., Clawson D. (2018) Control over Time: Employers, Workers, and Families Shaping Work Schedules. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 44. P. 77–97. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041400</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cormen T.H., Leiserson C.E., Rivest R.L., Stein C. Introduction to Algorithms. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2022.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gol E.S., Stein M.-K., Avital M. (2019) Crowdwork Platform Governance toward Organizational Value Creation. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. Vol. 28. Is. 2. P. 175–195. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Duggan J., Sherman U., Carbery R., McDonnell A. Algorithmic Management and App-Work in the Gig Economy: A Research Agenda for Employment Relations and HRM // Human Resource Management Journal. 2020. Vol. 30. Is. 1. P. 114–132. DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.12258</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jago A.S. (2019) Algorithms and Authenticity. Academy of Management Discoveries. Vol. 5. Is. 1. P. 38–56. DOI: 10.5465/amd.2017.0002</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Elbanna A., Idowu A. Crowdwork, Digital Liminality and the Enactment of Culturally Recognised Alternatives to Western Precarity: Beyond Epistemological Terra Nullius // European Journal of Information Systems. 2022. Vol. 31. Is. 1. P. 128–144. DOI: 10.1080/0960085X.2021.1981779</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jarrahi M.H., Sutherland W., Nelson S.B., Sawyer S. (2020) Platformic Management, Boundary Resources for Gig Work, and Worker Autonomy. Computer Supported Cooperative Work-the Journal of Collaborative Computing and Work Practices. Vol. 29. Is. 1–2. P. 153–189. DOI: 10.1007/s10606-019-09368-7</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Eubanks V. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2018.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jialiang P., Shanshi L., Xun C., Jiaojiao Qu. (2021) Perceived Algorithmic Control of Gig Workers: Conceptualization, Measurement and Verification the Impact on Service Performance. Nankai Management Review. Vol. 24. Is. 6. P. 14–27.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ferrari F., Graham M. Fissures in Algorithmic Power: Platforms, Code, and Contestation // Cultural Studies. 2021. Vol. 35. Is. 4–5. P. 814–832. DOI: 10.1080/09502386.2021.1895250</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kellogg K.C., Valentine M.A. Christin A. (2020) Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control. Academy of Management Annals. Vol. 14. Is. 1. P. 366–410. DOI: 10.5465/annals.2018.0174</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gerstel N., Clawson D. Control over Time: Employers, Workers, and Families Shaping Work Schedules // Annual Review of Sociology. 2018. Vol. 44. P. 77–97. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041400</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kovalenko A.I. (2020) Network Effect as a Sign of Dominating Position of Digital Platforms. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya. No. 1(77). P. 18–37. DOI: 10.37791/1993-7598-2020-14-1-18-37</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gol E.S., Stein M.-K., Avital M. Crowdwork Platform Governance toward Organizational Value Creation // Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 2019. Vol. 28. Is. 2. P. 175–195. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.001</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lepri B., Oliver N., Letouzé E., Pentland A., Vinck P. (2018) Fair, Transparent, and Accountable Algorithmic Decision-Making Processes: The Premise, the Proposed Solutions, and the Open Challenges. Philosophy &amp; Technology. Vol. 31. Is. 1. P. 611–627. DOI: 10.1007/s13347-017-0279-x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jago A.S. Algorithms and Authenticity // Academy of Management Discoveries. 2019. Vol. 5. Is. 1. P. 38–56. DOI: 10.5465/amd.2017.0002</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Linets A.A. (2021) Legal Nature of Relations Arising in Connection with the Performence of Personal Labor within the Gig-Economy. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11: Pravo. No. 5. P. 47–69.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jarrahi M.H., Sutherland W., Nelson S.B., Sawyer S. Platformic Management, Boundary Resources for Gig Work, and Worker Autonomy // Computer Supported Cooperative Work-the Journal of Collaborative Computing and Work Practices. 2020. Vol. 29. Is. 1–2. P. 153–189. DOI: 10.1007/s10606-019-09368-7</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Litovchenko O.V. (2020) Gig-Economy as a New Model of Labor Relations. Voprosy ustoychivogo razvitiya obshchestva. No. 9. P. 130–136. DOI: 10.34755/IROK.2020.14.17.017</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jialiang P., Shanshi L., Xun C., Jiaojiao Qu. Perceived Algorithmic Control of Gig Workers: Conceptualization, Measurement and Verification the Impact on Service Performance // Nankai Management Review. 2021. Vol. 24. Is. 6. P. 14–27.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Meijerink J., Keegan A. (2019) Conceptualizing Human Resource Management in the Gig Economy toward a Platform Ecosystem Perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology. Vol. 34. Is. 4. P. 214–232. DOI: 10.1108/JMP-07-2018-0277</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kellogg K.C., Valentine M.A. Christin A. Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control // Academy of Management Annals. 2020. Vol. 14. Is. 1. P. 366–410. DOI: 10.5465/annals.2018.0174</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Panteli N., Rapti A., Scholarios D. (2020) “If He Just Knew Who We Were”: Microworkers’ Emerging Bonds of Attachment in a Fragmented Employment Relationship. Work Employment and Society. Vol. 34. Is. 3. P. 476–494. DOI: 10.1177/0950017019897872</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lepri B., Oliver N., Letouzé E., Pentland A., Vinck P. Fair, Transparent, and Accountable Algorithmic DecisionMaking Processes: The Premise, the Proposed Solutions, and the Open Challenges // Philosophy &amp; Technology. 2018. Vol. 31. Is. 1. P. 611–627. DOI: 10.1007/s13347-017-0279-x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Parth Sh., Bathini D.R. (2021) Microtargeting Control: Explicating Algorithmic Control and Nudges in Platform-Mediated Cab Driving in India. New Technology Work and Employment. Vol. 36. Is. 1. P. 74–93. DOI: 10.1111/ntwe.12188</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Meijerink J., Keegan A. Conceptualizing Human Resource Management in the Gig Economy toward a Platform Ecosystem Perspective // Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2019. Vol. 34. Is. 4. P. 214–232. DOI: 10.1108/JMP-07-2018-0277</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Romanets I.I. Verbovskii G.D. (2021) Gig-Economy as a New Form of Markets Relations. Innovatsionnaya ekonomika: perspektivy razvitiya i sovershenstvovaniya. No. 1(51). P. 186–192. DOI: 10.47581/2021/FA-07/IE/51/01.029</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Panteli N., Rapti A., Scholarios D. “If He Just Knew Who We Were”: Microworkers’ Emerging Bonds of Attachment in a Fragmented Employment Relationship // Work Employment and Society. 2020. Vol. 34. Is. 3. P. 476–494. DOI: 10.1177/0950017019897872</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tóth Z., Nemkova E., Hizsák G., Naudé P. (2022) Social Capital Creation On Professional Sharing Economy Platforms: The Problems of Rating Dependency and the Non-Transferability of Social Capital. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 144. P. 450–460. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.090</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Parth Sh., Bathini D.R. Microtargeting Control: Explicating Algorithmic Control and Nudges in PlatformMediated Cab Driving in India // New Technology Work and Employment. 2021. Vol. 36. Is. 1. P. 74–93. DOI: 10.1111/ntwe.12188</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Varavva M.Yu. Lazareva O.S. (2022) Platform Gig-Economy as Alternative Model with Non-standard Labor Relations. Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G.V. Plekhanova. No. 5(125). P. 108–115. DOI: 10.21686/2413-2829-2022-5-108-115</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tóth Z., Nemkova E., Hizsák G., Naudé P. Social Capital Creation On Professional Sharing Economy Platforms: The Problems of Rating Dependency and the Non-Transferability of Social Capital // Journal of Business Research. 2022. Vol. 144. P. 450–460. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.090</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Veen A., Barratt T., Goods C. (2020) Platform-Capital’s ‘App-etite’ for Control: A Labour Process Analysis of Food-Delivery Work in Australia. Work Employment and Society. Vol. 34. Is. 3. P. 388–406. DOI: 10.1177/0950017019836911</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Veen A., Barratt T., Goods C. Platform-Capital’s ‘App-etite’ for Control: A Labour Process Analysis of Food-Delivery Work in Australia // Work Employment and Society. 2020. Vol. 34. Is. 3. P. 388–406. DOI: 10.1177/0950017019836911</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zuboff S. (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile books.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zuboff S. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile books, 2019.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zuboff S. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile books, 2019.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
