Preview

Public Administration. E-journal (Russia)

Advanced search

Developing the Model of Social Controlling of Enterprise’s Innovative Activity

https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-111-2025-82-101

Abstract

Innovation is the key to growth and competitive advantage in the modern economy. After all, it is innovation that leads to the emergence of new products, services, allows enterprises to reduce production costs, enter new markets, compete and develop. Measuring the results of innovation activity, as well as the process of its implementation and realization is a very difficult, but at the same time, very relevant area. The development of an adaptive model of social controlling in innovation activity contributes to the use and creation of favorable conditions, including by improving the coordination of enterprise activities and in response to the actions of the external environment, which determines the relevance of the study. The aim is to develop an adaptive model of social controlling of innovation activity, taking into account the evolution and transformation of understanding of controlling from the initial (as a system of instrumental support of economic activity) to the management of the enterprise as a social system. To achieve the aim the following objectives were solved: the basic ideas of controlling, controlling innovations were considered; the foreign experience of formation of the system of assessment and control of innovations both at the state level and at the level of enterprises were studied, and on their basis the concept and adaptive model of social controlling of innovation activity of the enterprise was formed. The study uses the methods of statistical and comparative analysis, synthesis, expert survey on a formalized questionnaire, conducted within the framework of the phenomenological approach, which allows identifying attitudes, internal motives for innovation activity, variability of opinions, understanding of the essence of the problem. As a result, the model of social controlling of innovation activity of the enterprise was developed and formed; the key criteria, key factors necessary for monitoring and impact in the context of management of innovation activity of the enterprise as a social system were revealed. The developed adaptive model of social controlling of innovation activity is aimed at creating favorable conditions for innovation activity at the enterprise, embedded in the system of general controlling of the enterprise. Such elements as organizational culture, innovation climate, socio-psychological climate of the team, value orientations, motivation and readiness for innovation are extremely important in this mechanism of origin, formation and dissemination of innovative ideas, which allows transforming intentions into actions, increasing the level of knowledge of personnel, their skills and turning the process of creating innovations into interdependent goals, which is characteristic of learning organizations.

About the Author

A. A. Kovalenko
LLC “Expertise RSN”
Russian Federation

Alexander A. Kovalenko, Legal advisor

Moscow



References

1. Astanakulov O.T. (2019) Problems of Efficiency of Innovative Activity of the Enterprise. Sovremennaya nauka: aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriya: Ekonomika i pravo. No. 5. P. 87–91.

2. Birchall D., Chanaron J.J., Tovstiga G., Hillenbrand C. (2011) Innovation Performance Measurement: Current Practices, Issues and Management Challenges. International Journal of Technology Management. Vol. 56. Is. 1. DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.2011.042492

3. Boukis A. (2016) Managing Innovation within Organizations. In: Goel A.K., Singhal P. (eds.) Product Innovation through Knowledge Management and Social Media Strategies. Hershey: IGI Global Publication. P. 273–294.

4. Buka S.A. (2024) Assessment of Mechanisms of Regulation of Innovative Activity in the Global Competitiveness System. Vestnik Innovatsionnogo Evraziyskogo universiteta. No. 2(94). P. 139–147.

5. Cruz-Cázares C., Bayona-Sáez C., García-Marco T. (2013) You Can’t Manage Right What You Can’t Measure Well: Technological Innovation Efficiency. Research Policy. Vol. 42. P. 1239–1250. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.012

6. Danilochkina N.G., Cherner N.V., Bobrova M.B. (2016) Controlling as Instrument of Economical Production. Kontrolling, kak mekhanizm realizatsii proyektov integrirovannoy sistemy menedzhmenta i berezhlivogo proizvodstva: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov V mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii po kontrollingu. Moscow: Ob”yedineniye kontrollerov. P. 62–69.

7. Fritsch M., Slavtchev V. (2006) Measuring the Efficiency of Regional Innovation Systems — An Empirical Assessment. Freiberg Working Papers № 2006/08. Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/ bitstream/10419/27102/1/512532931.PDF

8. Grünfeld L.A., Jakobsen E.W., Kaloudis A., Skogli E., Olsen D. (2011) Key Innovation Indicators. Learning from Principles and Practices Applied by Professional Industrial Players and Investors. Oslo: Nordic Innovation Publication.

9. Havlíček K., Thalassinos E., Berezkinova L. (2013) Innovation Management and Controlling SMEs. European Research Studies. Vol. XVI. Is. 4. P. 57–70. DOI: 10.35808/ersj/403

10. Ivanov V.G. (2021) Osobennosti kontrollinga sotsial’noy otvetstvennosti [Peculiarities of social responsibility controlling]. Upravleniye organizatsiyey, bukhgalterskiy uchet i ekonomicheskiy analiz: voprosy, problemy, i perspektivy razvitiya: Materialy VI Vserossiyskoy (natsional’noy) (nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Magnitogorsk: Magnitogorskiy gosudarstvennyy tekhnicheskiy universitet im. G.I. Nosova. P. 94-99.

11. Ivanova N.E., Ivanov V.G. (2020) Sotsial’nyy kontrolling v sisteme upravleniya izmeneniyami predpriyatiya [Social controlling in the enterprise change management system]. Upravleniye organizatsiyey, bukhgalterskiy uchet i ekonomicheskiy analiz: voprosy, problemy, perspektivy razvitiya: Materialy V Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Magnitogorsk: Magnitogorskiy gosudarstvennyy tekhnicheskiy universitet im. G.I. Nosova. P. 67–69.

12. Kharitonova N.A., Kharitonova E.N., Kha A.T. (2006) Evaluation of Social Responcibility for Business of Industrial Enterprises. Metallurg. No. 12. P. 13–17.

13. Klimkovich N.I. (2018) Controlling of the Social Responsibility of Business in the Context of Inclusive Society Development. Nauchnyye trudy Respublikanskogo instituta vysshey shkoly. No. 17. P. 344–351.

14. Kolk M., Kyte P., van Oene F., Jacobs J. (2012) Innovation: Measuring It to Manage It. Prism. Is. 1. P. 41–51.

15. Koloskova O.I. (2019) Instrumental-Methodical Aspects of Estimation of Innovative Activity Efficiency in the Industry. Sovremennaya ekonomika: problemy i resheniya. No. 12(120). P. 154–167. DOI: 10.17308/meps.2019.12/2271

16. Konev Yu.M., Tret’yakova O.V., Baikina Yu.O. (2023) Social Controlling. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Sotsiologiya. Ekonomika. Politika. Vol. 16. No. 3. P. 35–50. DOI: 10.31660/1993-1824-2023-3-35-50

17. Kovalenko A.A. (2014) A Study of Innovative Activity Motivation. Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye. Elektronnyy vestnik. No. 47. P. 54–79.

18. Kovalenko A.A., Malyshev M.A. (2023) Value Orientations of Managers and Innovation Management at Enterprises. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. No. 3. P. 146–164. DOI: 10.31857/S0869049923030103

19. Kovalev T.V. (2024) Razrabotka indikatorov otsenki innovatsionnoy deyatel’nosti sovremennoy organizatsii APK [Development of indicators for assessing the innovation activity of a modern agro-industrial complex organization]. Upravlenie riskami v APK. No. S3(53). P. 43–46.

20. Kruglov D.V., Sinov V.V. (2015) Kontrolling kak vazhneyshaya sostavlyayushchaya innovatsionnogo razvitiya predpriyatiya [Controlling as major constituent of innovative development of enterprise]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. No. 1–2. Available at: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=19970

21. Kunanbaeva K.B. (2017) Sotsial’nyy kontrolling kak metod upravleniya razvitiyem gradoobrazuyushchikh organizatsiy chernoy metallurgii [Social controlling as a method of managing the development of city-forming organizations of ferrous metallurgy]. Sovremennyye korporativnyye strategii i tekhnologii v Rossii: Sbornik nauchnykh statey. Moscow: Finansovyy universitet pri Pravitel’stve RF. Is. 12. Part 1. P. 78–84.

22. Manoochehri G. (2010) Measuring Innovation: Challenges and Best Practices. California Journal of Operations Management. Vol. 8. Is. 1. P. 67–73.

23. Neverov A.V., Dudnik A.S. (2016) Conceptual and Methodological Aspects of the Assessment of the Organization’s Readiness to Innovations. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Sociologiya. 2016. Vol. 16. No. 3. P. 623–634.

24. Petrov A.V., Karaseva K.S. (2015) Main Theoretical Approaches to the Study of Modern Corporate Labour Culture. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 12. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya. Pedagogika. No. 2. P. 86–92.

25. Raiskaya M.V. (2021) Assessment of Innovative Activity Parameters of the Region (on the Example of the Privolzhsky Federal District). Innovatsionnaya deyatel’nost’. No. 3(58). P. 40–49.

26. Revilla E. (2003) The Social Approach of Knowledge Management: The Effect on the Organizational Learning Capacity. Working Papers Economia wp03-08.

27. Reznikova A.V., SHmanenkova G.A. (2012) Social Controlling as Method of Innovative Management in the Social Sphere. Voprosy regional’noy ekonomiki. No. 4. P. 114–121.

28. Shavarova S.V., Shulgin V.G. (2024) Assessment of the Effectiveness of Innovation Development in Higher Education Institutions. Nauchnyy aspekt. Vol. 23. No. 1. P. 2901–2906.

29. Shilo I.N. (2012) Innovative Environment as an Object of Sociological Analysis. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. No. 8. P. 114–120.

30. Tin K.L. (2005) Measuring Innovation Performance. Singapore: Information Services Division, National Library Board.

31. Trofimova I.N., Hamidullina E.Yu. (2018) State Policy on Innovation, Techno-Lobbyism and Interest Groups. Vestnik Instituta sociologii. Vol. 9. No. 4. P. 137–154.

32. Vasiltsova N.T., Lobov D.S. (2019) Domestic Theory and Practice of Evaluating the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Innovative Activities of Companies. Aktual’nye problemy social’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossii. No. 3. P. 36–40.

33. Yur’eva L.V., Kazakova M.A. (2014) Development of Information Support for the Innovation Activity of Industrial Enterprises on the Basis of Controlling. Finansovaya politika: problemy i resheniya. No. 39(225). P. 12–24.

34. Zaharov D.Yu., Tyurin S.B. (2021) Social’noe partnerstvo v processe kontrollinga na predpriyatii [Social partnership in the process of controlling at the enterprise]. Sotsial’noye partnerstvo: opyt, problemy i perspektivy razvitiya: Sbornik dokladov i tezisov uchastnikov konferentsii. Moscow: Obrazovatel’noye uchrezhdeniye profsoyuzov vysshego obrazovaniya “Akademiya truda i sotsial’nykh otnosheniy”. P. 182–184.

35. Zaitsev I.A., Gorokhova A.Ev. (2021) Methods for Assessing the Innovativeness of a Small Enterprise in the Digital Economy. Drukerovskiy vestnik. No. 4(42). P. 150–162. DOI: 10.17213/2312-6469-2021-4-150-162


Review

For citations:


Kovalenko A.A. Developing the Model of Social Controlling of Enterprise’s Innovative Activity. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2025;1(111):82-101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-111-2025-82-101

Views: 30

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2070-1381 (Online)