Social Architecture of the City: Historical Memory in a Modern Interior
https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-115-2026-210-224
Abstract
The article analyzes the concepts of architecture and social architecture, viewing the latter as a metaphoric construct reflecting the complex interactions between humans and space. The underlying premise is that architecture, as a cultural phenomenon and social practice, evolves in accordance with sociocultural paradigms, needs, and opportunities of society. In this context, architecture emerges as a tool for understanding and transforming social space, reflecting the dynamics of social relations and value orientations. A brief overview of various approaches to understanding social architecture is presented within philosophical, sociological, and business discourses, as well as within the context of network structures. Particular attention is paid to the historical context of the development of social space using the example of one of Moscow’s oldest districts — Zamoskvorechye, where architectural solutions and social practices demonstrate the interconnectedness between the organizational, functional, and social aspects of spatial development. The study demonstrates that social architecture was initially aimed at harmonizing social life in a specific spatial context, ensuring the satisfaction of the social needs of individuals and communities. Thus, the phenomenon of social architecture is considered as an integrative process that includes not only architectural planning decisions, but also socio-cultural, economic and political factors that determine the development and functioning of social space.
About the Author
N. S. GrigorievaRussian Federation
Natalia S. Grigorieva, DSc (Political Sciences), Professor, Head of the Department of Management Sociology
Moscow
References
1. Alexander C., Ishikawa S., Silverstein M. (1977) A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Drozdov D.P. (2012) Bol’shaya Ordynka. Progulka po Zamoskvorech’yu [Bolshaya Ordynka. A Walk along Zamoskvorechye]. Moscow: Tsentropoligraf.
3. Dzema A.I. (2006) “Open Society” and Piecemeal Social Engineering by Karl Popper. Chelovek. Soobshchestvo. Upravleniye. No. 2. P. 112–122.
4. Gelfond A.A. (2025) Arkhitektura obshchestvennykh prostranstv [Architecture of public spaces] Moscow: INFRA-M.
5. Giddens A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
6. Grigorieva N.S. (2010) Sotsial’naya arkhitektura sovremennogo megapolisa [Social architecture of a modern megalopolis]. Materialy 8-y Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii fakul’teta gosudarstvennogo upravleniya MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova (May 26–28, 2010). Seriya «Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye». Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta. Vol. 10. P. 402–410.
7. Hintjens P. (2016) Social Architecture: Building On-line Communities. GitBook.
8. Kolpakov V.A., Fedotova V.G. (2013) Tekhnologiya postepennykh sotsial’nykh preobrazovaniy ili sotsial’naya inzheneriya K. Poppera [Technology of gradual social transformations or social engineering of K. Popper]. Epistemiologiya i filosofiya nauki. Vol. 38. No. 4. P. 62–71.
9. Laloux F. (2016). Reinventing Organizations: An Illustrated Invitation to Join the Conversation on Next-Stage Organizations. Brussels: Nelson Parker.
10. Nekrasov A. I. (1994) Teoriya arkhitektury [Theory of architecture]. Moscow: Stroyizdat.
11. Shcherbina V.V. (2014) Social Technologies: A History of Term, Content Transformation, and Contemporary State. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. No. 7. P. 113–124.
12. Toffler A., Toffler H. (2008) Revolutionary Wealth: How It Will Be Created and How It Will Change Our Lives. Moscow: AST.
Review
For citations:
Grigorieva N.S. Social Architecture of the City: Historical Memory in a Modern Interior. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2026;1(115):210-224. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-115-2026-210-224
JATS XML
