Preview

Public Administration. E-journal (Russia)

Advanced search

State Support for Commercialization of Intellectual Activity Results in Socially Significant Industries

https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-103-2024-196-207

Abstract

The pharmaceutical industry is one of the leaders in terms of the intensity of commercialization of the intellectual activity results (IAR). Its development as a socially significant industry is a priority in the state policy of countries with developing economies, in particular, the countries of the Latin American region (LA). A number of economic conditions for the development of commercialization of the IAR in these countries are similar to the Russian economy. Common barriers to development include dependence on imported substances, inefficient interaction between science and business, lack of public and private investment in R&D, and insufficient development of the intellectual property (IP) institution. At the same time, it is possible to identify common growth drivers: the growth potential of the consumer market, unique natural resources, relatively high scientific potential, and the concentration of R&D in research institutes and universities. The similarity of the conditions helps to suggest that it is possible to adapt the best practices of IAR commercialization formed in the LA, to the Russian economy. The research method used in this article include analyzing published legislative and statistical materials on financial institutions of the LA countries in order to identify problems and experience in overcoming them in the field of commercialization of intellectual property. The analysis of state support for imitation, closed and open models of commercialization of IAR used by pharmaceutical companies in developing economies made it possible to identify successful support mechanisms, as well as positive and negative results of the application of each model. On this basis, as the results of the research recommendations for state support for the commercialization in socially significant industries of the Russian economy are suggested.

About the Authors

N. P. Kononkova
Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Natalia P. Kononkova DSc (Economics), Associate Professor

Faculty of Economics

Moscow



N. V. Polavskaya
Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Natalia V. Polavskaya PhD applicant

Faculty of Economics

Moscow



References

1. Avila-Lopez L., Lyu Ch., Lopez-Leyva S. (2019) Innovation and Growth: Evidence from Latin American Countries. Journal of Applied Economics. Vol. 22. Is. 1. P. 287–303. DOI: 10.1080/02102412.2019.1610624

2. Bertoldi A., Wagner A.K., Emmerick I.C., Arueira Chaves L., Stephens P., Ross-Degnan D. (2019) The Brazilian Private Pharmaceutical Market after the First Ten Years of the Generics Law. Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice. Vol. 12. DOI: 10.1186/s40545-019-0179-9

3. Botelho A., Almeida M. (2011) Overcoming Institutional Shortcomings for Academic Spin-Off Policies in Brazil. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development. Vol. 9. Is. 3. P. 175–193. DOI: 10.1386/tmsd.9.3.175_1

4. Chaplenko A.A., Vlasov V.V., Gildeeva G.N. (2020) Innovative Medicines on the Russian Pharmaceutical Market: Key Players and Main Directions of Development. Remedium. No. 10. P. 4–9. DOI: 10.21518/1561-5936-2020-10-4-9

5. Graham L. (2014) Lonely Ideas: Can Russia Compete? Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber.

6. Kononkova N.P., Polávskaya N.V. (2021) Comercialización de los resultados de actividad intelectual como factor del desarrollo de la industria farmacéutica en América Latina. Iberoamérica. No. 2. P. 60–85. DOI: 10.37656/s20768400-2021-2-03

7. Paranhos J., Hasenclever L., Perin F. (2023) The Brazilian Pharmaceutical Industry: Actors, Institutions, and Policies. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. Vol. 51. Is. S1. P. 126–135. DOI: 10.1017/jme.2023.118

8. Tigre P.B., Nascimento C.V., Costa L.S. (2016) Windows of Opportunities and Technological Innovation in the Brazilian Pharmaceutical Industry. Cadernos de SaúdePública. Vol. 32. Is. 2. Available at: https://www.scielo.br/j/csp/a/kcwsv6PzjDVBBHdwPPCdg4R

9. Vargas V., Darrow J. (2023) Pharmaceutical Innovation in Latin America and the Сaribbean. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. Vol. 51. Is. S1. P. 148–162. DOI: 10.1017/jme.2023.120

10. Wilsdon T., Haderi A., Dobreva Z., Ricciardi G. (2020) The Economic Impact of Changing the Environment for Innovation in Argentina — Applying the Lessons of Asia to Latin America. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. Vol. 23. Is. 5–6. P. 609–631. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12165


Review

For citations:


Kononkova N.P., Polavskaya N.V. State Support for Commercialization of Intellectual Activity Results in Socially Significant Industries. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2024;(103):196-207. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-103-2024-196-207

Views: 40

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2070-1381 (Online)