Preview

Public Administration. E-journal (Russia)

Advanced search

A Complex of Management Tools to Overcome Differentiation of Region’s Spatial Development

https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-103-2024-152-163

Abstract

A key direction of the state regional policy is sustainable socio-economic development of the regions of the Russian Federation. However, the solution of this issue is significantly complicated by a number of problems associated with the spatial heterogeneity of the country and further inequality in the level of socio-economic development of Russian regions. The relevance of this study is determined by the necessity to solve the problem of systematization of theoretical approaches to the description of mechanisms of socio-economic development of the subjects of the Russian Federation, aimed to overcome the spatial differentiation of territories by basic indicators. The object of the study is the regions of the Far Eastern and Siberian Federal Districts. The aim of the study is to develop the principles of systematization of tools for spatial development of the subjects of the Russian Federation depending on the level of differentiation of regions by basic principles. To achieve the aim, the authors used the following research methods: comparative analysis, empirical analysis, synthesis, statistical method, graphic research methods. Based on the comparative analysis of the existing causes of differentiation of spatial development of the subjects of the Siberian and Far Eastern Federal Districts, the objective and subjective factors of regional inequality were identified. The analysis of existing mechanisms of spatial development of the regions of the Siberian and Far Eastern Federal Districts revealed their insufficient efficiency in solving the problem of smoothing regional socio-economic inequality. The author’s approach to the formation of a set of management tools to overcome the differentiation of spatial development of regions on the example of the Siberian and Far Eastern Federal Districts on the basis of grouping the subjects according to the studied groups of basic indicators is proposed. The paper proposes the definition of individual characteristics of each subject of the Russian Federation as a basis for the formation of tools for spatial development of the region.

About the Authors

L. S. Leontieva
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Lidia S. Leontieva DSc (Economics), Professor

School of Public Administration

Moscow



D.-Kh. M. Kopush
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Dan-Khayaa M. Kopush Postgraduate student

School of Public Administration

Moscow



References

1. Arkhipova L.S., Gagarina G.Yu. (2015) Spatial Differentiation of Russian Regions and Their Competitiveness. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya “Ekonomika i pravo”. No. 4. P. 22–27.

2. Bukhvald E.M. (2020) Managing the Spatial Development of the Russian Economy: Goals and Tools. Upravlenets. Vol. 11. No. 6. P. 2–14. DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-6-1

3. Bulochnikov P.A., Smirnov K.B. (2019) Interregional Differentiation of Spatial Development of Regions of the Russian Federation. Peterburgskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal. No. 4. P. 68–75. DOI: 10.25631/PEJ.2019.4.68.75

4. Domnina I.N. (2022) Tools of Spatial Strategizing of the Economy: Legal Framework and Practice of Application. Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. Vol. 12. No. 6А. P. 133–145. DOI: 10.34670/AR.2022.71.64.016

5. Fomin M.V., Smirnov O.O. (2022) Spatial Development Sustainability of Siberia and the Russian Far East Regions. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal’nogo upravleniya. No. 1. P. 124–147. DOI: 10.17323/1999-5431-2022-0-1-124-147

6. Ilyin V.A., Uskova T.V. (2012) Methods of Overcoming the Spatial Socio-Economic Differentiation. Federalism. No. 3(67). P. 7–18.

7. Klevtsova M.G., Polozhentseva Yu.S., Stepanova A.R. (2018) Institutional Instruments to Overcome Differentiation of Economic Space in the Conditions of Globalization. Innovatsionnaya ekonomika: Perspektivy razvitiya i sovershenstvovaniya. No. 8(34). P. 148–155.

8. Kopush D-Kh.M., Leontieva L.S. (2022) Current Trends in the Spatial Development of Siberian Federal District Regions. Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye. Elektronnyy vestnik. No. 95. P. 161–174. DOI: 10.24412/2070-1381-2022-95-161-174

9. Kovalenko Е.G., Polushkina Т.М., Yakimova О.Yu., Akimova Yu.A. (2021) Tools to Overcome Internal Socio-Economic Inequality. Regionologiya. Vol. 29. No. 3. P. 611–641. DOI: 10.15507/2413-1407.116.029.202103.611-641

10. Laktaeva N.E., Kuptsova I.V. (2023) Prospects of Using Happiness Economics Concept in Assessing a Macroregion Socio-Economic Development. Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye. Elektronnyy vestnik. No. 101. P. 120–133. DOI: 10.24412/2070-1381-2023-101-120-133

11. Leontieva L.S., Kudina M.V., Voronov A.S., Sergeev S.S. (2021) Creating National Digital Sovereignty in the Context of Spatial Development Differentiation. Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye. Elektronnyy vestnik. No. 84. P. 277–299. DOI: 10.24412/2070-1381-2021-84-277-299

12. Liu Yi., Yigitcanlar T., Guaralda M., Degirmenci K., Liu A. (2024) Spatial Modelling of Urban Wind Characteristics: Review of Contributions to Sustainable Urban Development. Buildings. Vol. 14. Is. 3. DOI: 10.3390/buildings14030737

13. Matei G. (2023) Spatial Efficiency of Romaniaʼs Development Regions from the Perspective of Sustainable Development. Management of Sustainable Development. Vol. 15. Is. 2. P. 19–27. DOI: 10.54989/msd-2023-0013

14. Molchanov I.N. (2023) Country Strategic Planning in the Context of Strengthening Economic Security. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 21. Upravleniye (gosudarstvo i obshchestvo). No. 2. P. 141–159. DOI: 10.55959/MSU2073-2643-21-2023-2-141-159

15. Nasyrova S.I. (2022) Human-Oriented Economy: Elaborating a Definition. Russian Journal of Economics and Law. No. 2. P. 258–274. DOI: 10.21202/2782-2923.2022.2.258-274

16. Nurbatsin A., Kireyeva A., Gamidullaeva L., Abdykadyr T. (2023) Spatial Analysis and Technological Influences on Smart City Development in Kazakhstan. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development. Vol. 8. Is. 2. DOI: 10.24294/jipd.v8i2.3012

17. Shang M., Zhang Sh., Yang Q. (2024) The Spatial Role and Influencing Mechanism of the Digital Economy in Empowering High-Quality Economic Development. Sustainability. Vol. 16. Is. 4. DOI: 10.3390/su16041425

18. Shvetsov A.N. (2018) The Instruments of Polarized Spatial Development Policy. Federalism. No. 1. P. 82–103.

19. Song S., Fang L., Yang J., Zhou R., Bai G., Qiu Y. (2024) The Spatial-Temporal Matching Characteristics of Water Resources and Socio-Economic Development Factors: A Case Study of Guangdong Province. Water. Vol. 16. Is. 2. DOI: 10.3390/w16020362

20. Voronov A.S. (2019) Spatial Approach in the Development of Regions’ Socio-Economic Systems. Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye. Elektronnyy vestnik. No. 75. P. 249–267.

21. Zhuravlev D.M. (2020) The Economic Mechanism of Regional Development Management. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 21. Upravleniye (gosudarstvo i obshchestvo). No. 1. P. 43–56.

22. Zubarevich N.V. (2019) Spatial Development Strategy: Priorities and Instruments. Voprosy ekonomiki. No. 1. P. 135–145. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2019-1-135-145


Review

For citations:


Leontieva L.S., Kopush D.M. A Complex of Management Tools to Overcome Differentiation of Region’s Spatial Development. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2024;(103):152-163. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-103-2024-152-163

Views: 46

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2070-1381 (Online)