Emergency Situation and Emergency: Issues of Theoretical Conceptualisation
https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-103-2024-81-89
Abstract
This article raises the issue of using objective criteria as a guideline for the identification of emergencies. For this purpose, the author proposes to clarify the nature of the emergency through the comparison of the concept of “emergency situation” accepted in the Russian tradition with its Western analogue “emergency”. On this basis, the paper considers two approaches to defining an emergency. The first approach gives emergency situations a narrower content and from this point of view considers them as separate manifestations of emergency. The other approach, on the contrary, perceives emergency situations as a broader phenomenon, thereby equating them to the concept of emergency. The research unveils the main characteristics of an emergency — unpredictability, significant economic and human losses, the use of government emergency powers. This paper also forms an approach that eliminates semantic differences between Western and Russian scientific traditions and allows us to consider emergencies as events of a wide range of manifestations — humanitarian, economic, natural, etc. The vector of further research can be aimed at developing new approaches to defining and comparing an emergency situation, exception and state of emergency, developing a universal approach to defining an emergency in the context of globalisation and global emergency, proposing a new applied model of emergency management in the context of globalisation, developing a new typology of emergency situations, as well as searching for tools and determining the necessary resource base for managing new types of emergencies.
About the Author
M. I. SavinaRussian Federation
Maria I. Savina Рostgraduate student
School of Public Administration
Moscow
References
1. Agamben G. (2022) A che punto siamo? L’epidemia come politica. Moscow: Nookratiya.
2. Andreyev S.A. (2015) Conceptual Approaches to the Interpretation of the Concept “Emergency Situation”. Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta GPS MChS Rossii. No. 1(14). P. 47–55.
3. Domrin A.N. (2006) The Limits of Russian Democratisation: Emergency Powers and States of Emergency. Abingdon: Routledge.
4. Ferejohn J., Pasquino P. (2004) The Law of the Exception: A Typology of Emergency Powers. International Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 2. Is. 2. P. 210–239. DOI: 10.1093/icon/2.2.210
5. Frolov A.I. (2014) Chrezvychaynyye situatsii: grazhdansko-pravovoy aspekt [Emergencies: Civil law aspect]. Strategiya grazhdanskoy zashchity: problemy i issledovaniya. Vol. 4. No. 1(6). P. 4–15.
6. Gluschenko P.P., Shakyurov E.A. (2012) History of Developing Authority Vested in Government Bodies to Restrict Rights, Freedoms and Lawful Interests of Citizens in an Emergency Area. Sotsiologiya i pravo. No. 1(12). P. 66–81.
7. Gross O., Aolain F.N. (2006) Law in Times of Crisis: Emergency Powers in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Kalina E.S. (2011) The Concept of Emergency in Administrative Law: The Structure and Content. Vestnik VGU. No. 1(10). P. 262–267.
9. Knyazhev V.B., Maydykov A.F. (2018) Some Specifics about Legal Control of Activity of Internal Affairs Bodies of the Russian Federation in Special Conditions. Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii. No. 3(47). P. 91–96.
10. Kropacheva A.V. (2018) Improving the System of Administrative-Legal Protection of Population and Territories from Emergency Situations in Terms of Administrative Reform. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA). No. 1(41). P. 110–116. DOI: 10.17803/2311-5998.2018.41.1.110-116
11. Lazar N.C. (2009) States of Emergency in Liberal Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511596704
12. Porfir’yev B.N. (1989) Organizatsiya upravleniya v chrezvychaynykh situatsiyakh [Organization of emergency management]. Moscow: Znaniye.
13. Roach K. (2008) Ordinary Laws for Emergency and Democratic Derogations from Rights. In: Ramraj V.V. (ed.) Emergencies and the Limits of Legality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 229–257. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511552021.011
14. Sagos N. (2014) Democracy, Emergency, and Arbitrary Coercion: A Liberal Republican View. Boston, MA: Brill.
15. Snegovoy A.V. (2012) About Some Approaches to the Definition of the Concept of Extraordinary Circumstances and of Its Types. Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii. No. 4(24). P. 38–41.
16. Starostin S.A. (2019) Chrezvychaynoye polozheniye [State of emergency]. Moscow: Prospekt.
17. Taleb N.N. (2018) The Black Swan. The Impact of the Highly Improbable. Moscow: KoLibri, Azbuka-Attikus.
Review
For citations:
Savina M.I. Emergency Situation and Emergency: Issues of Theoretical Conceptualisation. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2024;(103):81-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-103-2024-81-89
JATS XML