Socio-Managerial Analysis of Family Well-Being
https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-109-2025-132-145
Abstract
The topic of family well-being is relevant in the science and practice of management. The relevance is determined by the needs of family and demographic policies in the face of new risks and the lack of discussion of family well-being as an object of effective management influence. The problem of the study lies in the insufficient analysis of the modern scientific foundations of managerial assistance to the well-being of the family. The aim of the article is to propose theoretical (ideal) models of family well-being and personal well-being in the family on the basis of a socio-managerial analysis of the main criteria and indicators of well-being to ensure such assistance. The research methods are based on integrative-complex, interdisciplinary approaches; involve a systematic analysis of the family as a social institution, a small social group, a social microenvironment of personality realization; an anthropocentric approach; analysis of official documents, materials of domestic and foreign studies. The research has shown that the well-being of the family includes material, moral, psychological, socio-political, demographic, legal, value and other objective and subjective indicators. They manifest themselves not only at the institutional, group, individual and personal levels of family interaction, which are inextricably linked, but also in situational and event dynamics. The adaptability and ability to self-preservation of the family in difficult situations are emphasized. The authors point out the importance of objective, socially significant indicators, but emphasize the dominance of subjective indicators, self-perception of the well-being of their family. The study also develops ideas about the possible satiation of goods, an excess of which, like a deficit, can negatively affect the well-being of the family; it indicates the need for personal, family and social efforts to ensure the well-being of the family. Special attention is paid to state support for the institution of the family through management measures, as well as self-management techniques in the family as a small group and taking into account the personal well-being of citizens. The presented views in the socio-managerial analysis of family well-being can be used for a further research in the field of public administration in the family sphere and for improving family government and corporate policy.
Keywords
About the Authors
D. K. TanatovaRussian Federation
Dina K. Tanatova, DSc (Sociological Sciences), Professor, Head of the Department of Sociology, Ethnography and Sociometry
Moscow
M. V. Vdovina
Russian Federation
Margarita V. Vdovina, DSc (Sociological Sciences), Professor of the Department of Sociology, Ethnography and Sociometry
Moscow
I. V. Dolgorukova
Russian Federation
Irina V. Dolgorukova, DSc (Sociological Sciences), Professor of the Department of Sociology, Ethnography and Sociometry
Moscow
References
1. Aliev D.F., Tanatova D.K., Korolev I.V. (2024) Sotsiologicheskiy monitoring semeynogo blagopoluchiya i reproduktivnykh ustanovok rossiyskogo naseleniya [Sociological monitoring of family well-being and reproductive attitudes of the Russian population]. Moscow: RGSU.
2. Allardt E. (1976) Dimensions of Welfare in a Comparative Scandinavian Study. Acta Sociologica. Sociology, Political Science, Economics. Vol. 19. Is. 3. DOI: 10.1177/000169937601900302
3. Baturin N.A., Bashkatov S.A., Gafarova N.V. (2013) The Theoretical Model of Personal Wellfare. Vestnik YuzhnoUral’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologiya. Vol. 6. No. 4. P. 4–14.
4. Baturin N.A., Vyboyshchik I.V. (2011) Psikhologiya otsenivaniya i otsenki: teoreticheskiye i prikladnyye aspekty [Psychology of assessment and evaluation: Theoretical and applied aspects]. Chelyabinsk: Izd. tsentr YuUrGU.
5. Chernova Zh.V. (2017) Family Friendly Workplace: Political Initiatives, Employer’s Position and Types of Support for Workers with Family Responsibilities. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noy antropologii. Vol. 20. No. 1(89). P. 93–113.
6. Diener E. (1984) Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 95. Is. 3. P. 542–575. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542
7. Klimantova G.I. (2023) Rossiyskaya sem’ya v povsednevnoy zhizni: gorizonty blagopoluchiya [The Russian family in everyday life: Horizons of well-being]. Rossiyskaya sem’ya v povsednevnoy zhizni: gorizonty blagopoluchiya: Materialy XXI Mezhdunarodnogo kongressa “Rossiyskaya sem’ya”. Moscow: Izd-vo RGSU. P. 11–15.
8. Oishi S., Diener E., Lucas R.E. (2009) The Optimum Level of Well-being: Can People Be Too Happy? In: Diener E. (ed.) The Science of Well-Being. Dordrecht: Springer. P. 175–200. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2350-6_8
9. Reznik S.D., Turchaeva R.Ju. (2015) Processes of Self-Government in Modern Family. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. No. 1–1. Available at: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=19359
10. Rostovskaja T.K., Vasilieva E.N., Nikolskiy V.S. (2024) The Conditions of Functioning of the Student Family in Modern Russia: The Main Problems and Resources of Well-Being. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. Vol. 33. No. 7. P. 15–31. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-7-15-31
11. Rostovskaya T.K., Kalachikova O.N. (2022) The Value of the First Registered Marriage as a Determinant of a Successful Young Family: A Sociological Analysis. Logos et Praxis. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 54–65. DOI: 10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2022.1.6
12. Rostovskaya T.K., Kuchmaeva O.V., Zolotareva O.A. (2021) Assessment of the Social Well-Being of Families in Russian Regions: A Sociological Analysis. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya. Vol. 21. No. 4. P. 805–824. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2021-21-4-805-824
13. Rostovskaya T.K., Vasilieva E.N. (2023) Strategies for Forming the Well-Being of Student Families (by the Results of In-Depth Interview). Logos et Praxis. Vol. 22. No. 2. Р. 67–80. DOI: 10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2023.2.8
14. Ryff C.D., Singer B. (1998) The Contours of Positive Human Health. Psychological Inquiry. Vol. 9. Is. 1. P. 1–28. DOI: 10.1207/s15327965pli0901_1
15. Tanatova D.K., Korolev I.V. (2023) Demographic Trends and Reproductive Attitudes of the Russian Population. Sotsial’naya politika i sotsiologiya. Vol. 22. No. 3. P. 21–28. DOI: 10.17922/2071-3665-2023-22-3-21-28
16. Vdovina M.V. (2024a) Upravleniye tsifrovizatsiyey rossiyskikh semey: perspektivy razvitiya [Managing the digitalization of Russian families: Development prospects]. In: Razvitiye rossiyskoy sotsial’noekonomicheskoy sistemy: vyzovy i perspektivy. Cheboksary: OOO “Izdatel’skiy dom “Sreda”. Р. 177–187. DOI: 10.31483/r-110590
17. Vdovina M.V. (2024b) Digital Well-Being of Family and Childhood. Sotsial’naya politika i sotsiologiya. Vol. 23. No. 2. P. 40–47. DOI: 10.17922/2071-3665-2024-23-2-40-47
18. Warner W.L. (1941) The Social Life of a Modern Community. New Haven: Yale university press.
19. Weber M. (1990) Izbrannyye proizvedeniya [Selected works]. Moscow: Progress.
Review
For citations:
Tanatova D.K., Vdovina M.V., Dolgorukova I.V. Socio-Managerial Analysis of Family Well-Being. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2025;1(109):132-145. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-109-2025-132-145
JATS XML
