Preview

Public Administration. E-journal (Russia)

Advanced search

Reflection of Environmental Policy of Moscow Government and Moscow Region in Media News Context

https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-102-2024-207-221

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the environmental policy of the Government of Moscow and the Moscow region and its reflection in the news content of the mass media for the period from January 01 to July 31, 2023. The analysis of publications was carried out using the automated system Medialogy. The total number of analyzed publications is 6620 messages. The results of the study indicate that the gap associated with the population’s need for a favorable environmental situation and the real state of affairs tends to decrease. Publications have a pronounced positive emotional coloring. At the same time, the problems that, according to environmental monitoring by All-Russian Public Opinion Research Center, do not lose their relevance, namely, the response of the authorities to environmental problems, construction and transport issues, are reflected in publications in the media and make up a set of the most complete thematic headings. The information field in the sphere of ecology is sensitive to regulatory events: a surge of publications occurs in the period of active transformations in environmental legislation, which suggests that such a management tool as regulatory regulation has the greatest weight in the information space. An important role in shaping a positive perception of the environmental situation is given to dialogues with government officials (for example, the mayor of Moscow), as well as various environmental actions that allow government officials and environmental activists to carry out targeted activities and broadcast their benefits to the population. As prospects for further research, the opportunity to analyze the publications of various persons, groups and channels in social networks is highlighted.

About the Authors

M. V. Rybakova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Marina V. Rybakova, DSc (Sociology), Principal Researcher, FCTAS RAS, Professor of Sociology

Moscow



M. M. Zvereva
FCTAS RAS
Russian Federation

Maria M. Zvereva, Postgraduate student

Moscow



References

1. Blumer H. (2019) Symbolic Interactionism. Moscow: Elementarnyye formy.

2. Bullard R.D. (1993) Confronting Environmental Racism: Voices from the Grassroots. Boston: South End Press.

3. Burgess E. (2015) The Growth of the City: An Introduction to a Research Project. In: Nikolayev V.G., Efremenko D.V (eds.) Chikagskaya shkola sotsiologii: sbornik perevodov. Mosocow: INION RAN. P. 20–34.

4. Decker E., Elliott S., Smith F. (2002) Megacities and the Environment. The Scientific World Journal. Vol. 2. P. 374-386. DOI: 10.1100/tsw.2002.103

5. Dobrynina Y.S. (2022) Environmental Problematic in Media Space of Chelyabinsk. Sotsiodinamika. No. 1. P. 18–35. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2022.1.37409

6. Habermas J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

7. Habermas J. (2022) Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns. Moscow: Ves’ mir.

8. Kleer J., Nawrot K.A. (eds.) (2018) The Rise of Megacities: Challenges, Opportunities and Unique Characteristics. London: World Scientific Publishing Europe Limited.

9. Landry C. (2012) The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. London, Sterling VA: Earthscan.

10. Lobodenko L.K., Perevozova O.V., Cherednyakova A.B., Kharitonova O.Yu. (2022) Analysis of the Representation of Environmental Issues in the Social Networks of Regional Internet Media // Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Literaturovedeniye, zhurnalistika. Vol. 27. No. 3. P. 600–614. DOI: 10.22363/2312-9220-2022-27-3-600-614

11. McLuhan M. (2003) Understanding Media. The Extensions of Man. Moscow: Kuchkovo Pole.

12. Milbrath L.W. (1984) Environmentalists: Vanguard for a New Society. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

13. Milbrath L.W. (1993) Redefining the Good Life in a Sustainable Society. Environmental Values. Vol. 2. Is. 3. P. 261–269. DOI: 10.3197/096327193776679891

14. Ong W.J. (2002) Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Routledge.

15. Porfir’eva I.D. (2020) Online Coverage of Regional Environmental Policy in the Republic of Tatarstan. Politicheskaya lingvistika. No. 1(79). P. 58–61. DOI: 10.26170/pl20-01-07

16. Rastorguyev S.V., Tyan Yu.S. (2021) Protest Eco-Activism in the Digital Environment (on the Example of the “Krasnoyarsk Case”). Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny. No. 6. P. 53–75. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.2017

17. Rogers E.M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.

18. Rybakova M.V., Zvereva M.M. (2022) The Environmental Situation in Moscow: Assessment of the Dynamics of Public Opinion Based on the Results of Polls in 2013–2022. Vlast’. Vol. 30. No. 5. P. 156–162. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v30i5.9256

19. Zvereva M.M. (2023) Socio-Ecological Practices of City-Dwellers within the Framework of Structural Constructivism and Cultural Anthropologism. Vlast’. Vol. 31. No. 3. P. 208–213. DOI: 10.31171/vlast. v31i3.9659


Review

For citations:


Rybakova M.V., Zvereva M.M. Reflection of Environmental Policy of Moscow Government and Moscow Region in Media News Context. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2024;(102):207-221. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-102-2024-207-221

Views: 40

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2070-1381 (Online)