Assessment of World Economy Transformation Impact on Dynamics of Economic Indicators in the World’s Leading Countries and Russia at the Beginning of the 21st Century
https://doi.org/10.24412/2070-1381-2023-101-56-71
Abstract
Transformation of the world economy at the beginning of the 21st century occurs because of the impact of numerous crisis phenomena. This world economic transformation shows up in dynamics of economic indicators under the influence of crisis processes and the anti-crisis policy of governments. Hence, it is of practical interest to assess the impact of crisis phenomena in conjunction with anti-crisis measures of national governments on the dynamics of economic indicators on a country basis to mitigate the consequences of future crisis situations or prevent them. Thus, the aim of the article is to study the dynamics of economic indicators in several leading economies in Europe, Asia, America, and Russia in the period from 2013 to 2021 to rank countries in terms of their ability to adapt and recover from the consequences of crises, in particular, the coronavirus pandemic. To achieve this aim, methods of system analysis and synthesis, content analysis of scientific literature and statistical reviews on the subject under study, materials of the periodical press of Russian and foreign authors were used. The study allows drawing several valuable conclusions about interconnection of economic processes in individual countries and in the world. The onset of the crisis has a negative effect simultaneously on all indicators’ groups, thereby confirming the presence of a “chain reaction” at the core of economic processes. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the dynamics of indicators on a country basis in the pandemic year, in 2020, which confirms the hypothesis that the effectiveness of the anti-crisis program undertaken by the government in the midst of the crisis plays a more important role than the initial pre-crisis state of the economy.
About the Authors
S. V. SenotrusovaRussian Federation
Svetlana V. Senotrusova, DSc (Biology), Professor
Moscow
I. V. Sibiriakova
Russian Federation
Iana V. Sibiriakova, Postgraduate student
Moscow
References
1. Al‐Thaqeb S.A., Algharabali B.G., Alabdulghafour K.T. (2022) The Pandemic and Economic Policy Uncertainty. International Journal of Finance & Economics. Vol. 27. Is. 3. P. 2784–2794. DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.2298
2. Bryushinkina A.A. (2020) The Theory of Purchasing Power Parity as the Basis of Exchange Rates: Is It Relevant in the XXI Century? Ekonomika i biznes: teoriya i praktika. No. 3–2(61). P. 17–20. DOI: 10.24411/2411-0450-2020-10202
3. Gorchakova M.E. (2020) Japan’s Bank Monetary Policy in the Context of Global Crisis. Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskiy region: ekonomika, politika, pravo. No. 2. P. 30–38. DOI: 10.24866/1813-3274/2020-2/30-38
4. Hodinova O.S. (2023) Migration Management in the European Union in the Context of COVID-19 and the Ukrainian Crisis on the Example of France. Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya v usloviyakh novykh ugroz bezopasnosti: sbornik materialov Pervoy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Moscow, April 28, 2022. Moscow: Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy lingvisticheskiy universitet. P. 62–66.
5. Kudryashova T.V., Dolgikh E.A. (2022) Gold and Foreign Exchange Reserves of the Russian Federation as a Factor in Ensuring the Stability of the Country’s Financial System. BENEFICIUM. No. 2(43). P. 66–72. DOI: 10.34680/BENEFICIUM.2022.2(43).66-72
6. Mutafyan A.S. (2022) Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Management of Gold and Foreign Exchange Reserves of Russia. Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. Vol. 12. No. 3A. P. 67–75. DOI: 10.34670/AR.2022.97.77.009
7. Nagao R., Kondo Y., Nakazono Y. (2021) The Macroeconomic Effects of Monetary Policy: Evidence from Japan. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies. Vol. 61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jjie.2021.101149
8. Shchegoleva N.G., Sibiriakova Ya.V. (2020) Intermediate Results of the 2020 Pandemic: The Time for the New Great Depression and the Banking System. Bankovskie uslugi. No. 6. P. 2–11. DOI: 10.36992/2075-1915_2020_6_2
9. Shchegoleva N.G., Sibiriakova Ya.V. (2021) Pandemic Impact on Macroeconomic Uncertainty. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya. No. 12. P. 66–84. DOI: 10.46486/0234-4505-2021-12-66-84
10. Sukharev O.S., Voronchikhina E.N. (2022) Development of Countries under Sanctions: Iran and Russia. R-ECONOMY. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 219–236. DOI: 10.15826/recon.2022.8.3.018
11. Teryan D. (2021) Specifics of the ECB’s Monetary Policy Unconventional Measures. Amberd Bulletin. Vol. 6(13). P. 10–16. DOI: 10.52174/2579-2989_2021_6_10
12. Ulumbekova G.E. (2021) Analysis of Budget Costs of the Russian Federation Budgetary System in “Healthcare” Section for 2022 and for the Planning Period of 2023–2024. ORGZDRAV: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie. Vestnik VShOUZ. Vol. 7. No. 4. P. 7–15. DOI: 10.33029/2411-8621-2021-7-4-7-15
13. Zelenkov I.D., Cvir D.P. (2015) Analysis of Dynamics of Marine Cargo World Market. Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskiy region: ekonomika, politika, pravo. No. 4. P. 68–79.
Review
For citations:
Senotrusova S.V., Sibiriakova I.V. Assessment of World Economy Transformation Impact on Dynamics of Economic Indicators in the World’s Leading Countries and Russia at the Beginning of the 21st Century. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2023;(101):56-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2070-1381-2023-101-56-71
JATS XML
