<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">gosupr</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Государственное управление. Электронный вестник</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Public Administration. E-journal (Russia)</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2070-1381</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Факультет государственного управления МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.55959/MSU2070-1381-110-2025-101-114</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">gosupr-230</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СОЦИОЛОГИЯ УПРАВЛЕНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>MANAGEMENT SOCIOLOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Создание социальных инноваций в некоммерческом секторе в условиях неопределенности</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Fostering Social Innovations in the Nonprofit Sector in an Uncertain Environment</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Лившин</surname><given-names>А. Я.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Livshin</surname><given-names>Alexander Ya.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Лившин Александр Яковлевич, доктор исторических наук, профессор, </p><p>Москва.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Alexander Ya. Livshin, DSc (History), Professor,</p><p>Moscow.</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">livshin@spa.msu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1166-4980</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Сидорова</surname><given-names>А. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Sidorova</surname><given-names>Aleksandra A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Сидорова Александра Александровна, кандидат экономических наук, доцент, </p><p>Москва.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Aleksandra A. Sidorova, PhD, Associate Professor, </p><p>Moscow.</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">Sidorova_A@spa.msu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Факультет управления, Совместный университет МГУ-ППИ в Шэньчжэне (КНР), факультет государственного управления, МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>School of Management, Shenzhen MSU-BIT University (China), School of Public Administration, Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Факультет государственного управления, МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>School of Public Administration, Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>05</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>110</issue><fpage>101</fpage><lpage>114</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Лившин А.Я., Сидорова А.А., 2026</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Лившин А.Я., Сидорова А.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Livshin A.Y., Sidorova A.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.spajournal.ru/jour/article/view/230">https://www.spajournal.ru/jour/article/view/230</self-uri><abstract><p>Одним из инструментов управления неопределенностью, применяемых некоммерческими организациями (НКО), является развитие социальных инноваций, позволяющих организации занимать проактивную позицию по отношению к происходящим в обществе изменениям. Однако на практике далеко не всем некоммерческим организациям удается эффективно заниматься инновационной деятельностью в рамках реализации своей основной социальной миссии. Целью данной статьи является выявление особенностей создания социальных инноваций в условиях высокой степени неопределенности внешней среды. Рассмотренные в статье модель Lean Impact и организационная амбидекстрия располагают достаточным потенциалом для обеспечения инновационного процесса в НКО. Следование базовым принципами модели Lean Impact (мыслите шире, начните с малого и постоянно стремитесь к эффективности), а также практическое внедрение схемы «создавай — измеряй — учись» способствуют повышению эффективности инновационной деятельности НКО, сокращая по времени инновационный цикл и уменьшая вероятность неудачи. Концепция организационной амбидекстрии фокусируется на поиске баланса между базисными и приростными инновациями в НКО в рамках достижения триединой цели — реализации социальной миссии, адаптации к потребностям бенефициаров и требованиям доноров, а также сохранения финансовой устойчивости. Основными этапами реализации организационной амбидекстрии в некоммерческой организации являются организационная реструктуризация, совместная работа в экосистеме и реализация совместного проекта организациями-партнерами. Залогом успеха нахождения баланса между базисными и приростными инновациями в НКО выступает органичное соединение трех типов амбидекстрии — структурной (создание соответствующих подразделений, отвечающих за эксперименты с MVP, реализацию программ и их масштабирование), контекстуальной (стратегический найм персонала и скоординированные усилия руководства) и межорганизационной (сотрудничество с организациями-партнерами для создания инновационных решений). Применение модели Lean Impact и организационной амбидекстрии в некоммерческом секторе будет способствовать улучшению внутренней организационной динамики, сохранению социальной эффективности и укреплению финансовой устойчивости.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>One of the uncertainty management tools used by nonprofit organizations (NPO) is the development of social innovations, allowing the organization to take a proactive position in relation to changes occurring in society. However, in practice, not all nonprofit organizations manage to effectively engage in innovative activities within the framework of implementing their main social mission. The aim of this article is to identify the features of creating social innovations in conditions of a high degree of uncertainty of the external environment. The Lean Impact and organizational ambidexterity discussed in the article have sufficient potential to ensure the innovation process in NPOs. Following the basic principles of Lean Impact (think bigger, start small and relentlessly seek impact), as well as the practical implementation of the “build — measure — learn feedback” loop contribute to increasing the efficiency of NPO innovation activities, shortening the innovation cycle and reducing the likelihood of failure. The concept of organizational ambidexterity focuses on finding a balance between basic and incremental innovations in NPOs in the context of achieving a three-pronged goal: implementing a social mission, adapting to the needs of beneficiaries and donor requirements, and maintaining financial sustainability. The main stages of implementing organizational ambidexterity in a nonprofit organization are: initial restructuring, collaborative ecosystem work, and launching a joint project by partner organizations. The key to successfully finding a balance between basic and incremental innovations in NPOs is the organic combination of three types of ambidexterity: structural (creating appropriate units responsible for experimenting with MVPs, implementing programs, and scaling them), contextual (strategic hiring and coordinated management efforts), and interorganizational (collaborating with partner organizations to create innovative solutions). The use of Lean Impact and organizational ambidexterity in the nonprofit sector will help improve internal organizational dynamics, maintain social effectiveness, and strengthen financial sustainability.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Социальные инновации</kwd><kwd>модель Lean Impact</kwd><kwd>организационная амбидекстрия</kwd><kwd>базисные и приростные инновации</kwd><kwd>исследование и эксплуатация</kwd><kwd>управление некоммерческими организациями</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Social innovation</kwd><kwd>Lean Impact</kwd><kwd>organizational ambidexterity</kwd><kwd>basic and incremental innovation</kwd><kwd>exploration and exploitation</kwd><kwd>nonprofit management</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Веретенникова А.Ю., Омонов Ж.К. Разработка и внедрение социальных инноваций в гражданском обществе // Журнал экономической теории. 2018. Т. 15. № 1. С. 84–95.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Abbas J., Bresciani S., Subhani G., De Bernardi P. (2024) Nexus of Ambidexterity and Frugal Innovation for Enhanced ESG Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms. The Role of Organizational Capabilities. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. Vol. 21. DOI: 10.1007/s11365-024-01062-5</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Воронов А.С., Исаева А.Э. Бизнес-экосистема и ее влияние на государственное управление предпринимательской деятельностью: теоретический обзор предметной области // Государственное управление. Электронный вестник. 2023. № 97. С. 138–154. DOI: 10.24412/2070-1381-2023-97-138-154</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bettin C., Ziyun F., Eriksson P. (2025) Open Social Innovation. In: Eriksson P., Montonen T., Laine P-M., Hannula A. (eds.) Elgar Encyclopedia of Innovation Management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. P. 113–116. DOI: 10.4337/9781035306459.00038</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дженас К.К. Успех социального стартапа. Как запускаются, растут и меняют мир лучшие некоммерческие проекты. М.: АНО Портал «Такие дела», 2019.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cannaerts N., Steijn B., Duijn M. (2025) Public Managers, Drivers of Ambidexterity in Public Service Delivery. The Perceived Impact of Red Tape and PSM on Ambidexterity. International Journal of Public Sector Management. Vol. ahead-of-print. DOI: 10.1108/IJPSM-04-2024-0120</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зуб А.Т. Эквифинальность в организационном проектировании // Актуальные вопросы экономических наук. 2011. № 19. С. 10–19.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chang A.M. (2020) Lean Impact: How to Innovate for Radically Greater Social Good. Moscow: ANO Portal “Takye dela”.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Краснопольская И., Скокова Ю. Цифровизация и ИИ в работе НКО: новые тренды и перспективы. М.: «ДПК Пресс», 2024.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chesbrough H.W. (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Купряшин Г.Л. Политико-административные способности государственного управления в условиях турбулентности и неопределенности // Государственное управление. Электронный вестник. 2023. № 97. С. 174–189. DOI: 10.24412/2070-1381-2023-97-174-189</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chijere Z. (2024) An Overview on Social Enterprises and Nonprofit Organizations. In: Nonprofit Social Enterprises. Lessons from Africa. Cham: Springer. P. 1–7. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-60234-4_1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лившин А.Я. Некоммерческие организации в системе межнациональных отношений: история и современность // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 21. Управление (государство и общество). 2023. Т. 20. № 4. С. 119–139. DOI: 10.55959/MSU2073-2643-21-2023-4-119-139</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dansero E., Battisti L., Cuomo F., Pettenati G., Sanesi G., Spano G. (2025) Benefits from social innovation. In: Barbero S., Timpe A. (eds.) Nature-Based Solutions for Urban Renewal in Post-Industrial Cities. New York: Routledge. Р. 189–206. DOI: 10.4324/9781003474869-12</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Миннигалеева Г.А. Инновационность российских НКО: масштабы и взаимосвязь с особенностями управления // Мониторинг общественного мнения: Экономические и социальные перемены. 2016. № 4. С. 67–78. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2016.4.05</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dover G., Lawrence T.B. (2011) The Role of Power in Nonprofit Innovation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. Vol. 41. Is. 6. P. 991–1013. DOI: 10.1177/0899764011423304</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Попов Е.В., Омонов Ж.К., Наумов И.В., Веретенникова А.Ю. Тенденции развития социальных инноваций // Terra Economicus. 2018. Т. 16. № 3. С. 36–59. DOI: 10.23683/2073-6606-2018-16-3-35-59</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Frumkin P. (2002) On Being Nonprofit: A Conceptual and Policy Primer. Cambridge (Mass.), London: Harvard University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сидорова А.А. Организационная амбидекстрия: концептуальные основы и современные подходы // Государственное управление. Электронный вестник. 2023. № 98. С. 86–95. DOI: 10.24412/2070-1381-2023-98-86-95</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hamblin R., 	Plimmer G., Badar K., 	Lasthuizen K. (2024) 	Organizational Ambidexterity: A Bibliometric Review and Framework for Future 	Public 	Administration 	Research. Public Performance &amp; Management Review. Vol. 47. P. 1073–1109. DOI: 10.1080/15309576.2024.2373178</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Чанг Э.М. Lean Impact. Инновации для масштабных социальных перемен. М.: АНО Портал «Такие дела», 2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Janus K.K. (2019) Social Startup Success. Hoe the Best Nonprofits Launch, Scale Up, and Make a Difference. Moscow: ANO Portal “Takye dela”.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Abbas J., Bresciani S., Subhani G., De Bernardi P. Nexus of Ambidexterity and Frugal Innovation for Enhanced ESG Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms. The Role of Organizational Capabilities // International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 2024. Vol. 21. DOI: 10.1007/s11365-024-01062-5</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khan A., Chen L.-R., Hung C.-Y. (2021) The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Supporting Second-Order Social Capital and Sustainable Innovation Ambidexterity. Sustainability. Vol. 13. Is. 13. DOI: 10.3390/su13136994</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bettin C., Ziyun F., Eriksson P. Open Social Innovation // Elgar Encyclopedia of Innovation Management / edited by P. Eriksson, T. Montonen, P-M. Laine, A. Hannula. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2025. P. 113–116. DOI: 10.4337/9781035306459.00038</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krasnopol’skaya I., Skokova Yu. (2024) Tsifrovizatsiya i II v rabote NKO: novyye trendy i perspektivy [Digitalization and AI in NPO operations: Emerging trends and perspectives]. Moscow: “DPK Press”.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cannaerts N., Steijn B., Duijn M. Public Managers, Drivers of Ambidexterity in Public Service Delivery. The Perceived Impact of Red Tape and PSM on Ambidexterity // International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2025. Vol. ahead-of-print. DOI: 10.1108/IJPSM-04-2024-0120</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kumalaningrum M.P., Wibowo B.S. (2024) Innovation Culture and Ambidexterity: Strategies to Deal with Environmental Uncertainty. COSTING: Journal of Economic, Business and Accounting. Vol. 6. Is. 7. P. 2176–2187.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chesbrough H.W. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing, 2003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kupryashin G.L. (2023) Political-Administrative Capacities of Governance in Conditions of Turbulence and Uncertainty. Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye. Elektronnyyvestnik. No. 97. P. 174–189. DOI: 10.24412/2070-1381-2023-97-174-189</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chijere Z. An Overview on Social Enterprises and Nonprofit Organizations // Nonprofit Social Enterprises. Lessons from Africa. Cham: Springer, 2024. P. 1–7. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-60234-4_1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Livshin A.Ya. (2023) Nonprofit Organizations in the System of Interethnic Relations: History and Contemporary Developments. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 21 . Upravlenie (gosudarstvo i obshchestvo). Vol. 20. No. 4. P. 119–139. DOI: 10.55959/MSU2073-2643-21-2023-4-119-139</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dansero E., Battisti L., Cuomo F., Pettenati G., Sanesi G., Spano G. Benefits from social innovation // Nature-Based Solutions for Urban Renewal in Post-Industrial Cities / edited by S. Barbero, A. Timpe. New York: Routledge, 2025. Р. 189–206. DOI: 10.4324/9781003474869-12</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">March J.G. (1991) Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science. Vol. 2. Is. 1. Р. 71–87.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dover G., Lawrence T.B. The Role of Power in Nonprofit Innovation // Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2011. Vol. 41. Is. 6. P. 991–1013. DOI: 10.1177/0899764011423304</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Minnigaleeva G.A. (2016) Innovativeness of the Russian NGOs: Scope of Implementation and Correlations with Management Characteristics. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie I sotsial’nye peremeny. No. 4. P. 67–78. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2016.4.05</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Frumkin P. On Being Nonprofit: A Conceptual and Policy Primer. Cambridge (Mass.), London: Harvard University Press, 2002.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Moulaert F., MacCallum D., Mehmood A., Hamdouch A. (eds.) (2013) The International Handbook on Social Innovation. Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Cheltenham / Northhampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hamblin R., Plimmer G., Badar K., Lasthuizen K. Organizational Ambidexterity: A Bibliometric Review and Framework for Future Public Administration Research // Public Performance &amp; Management Review. 2024. Vol. 47. P. 1073–1109. DOI: 10.1080/15309576.2024.2373178</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Murray R., CaulierGrice J., Mulgan G. (2010) The Open Book of Social Innovation. London: National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts; Young Foundation.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Khan A., Chen L.-R., Hung C.-Y. The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Supporting SecondOrder Social Capital and Sustainable Innovation Ambidexterity // Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 13. Is. 13. DOI: 10.3390/su13136994</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">O’Reilly C.A., Tushman M. (2013) Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present, and Future. Academy of Management Perspectives. Vol. 27. Is. 4. Р. 324–338. DOI: 10.5465/amp.2013.0025</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kumalaningrum M.P., Wibowo B.S. Innovation Culture and Ambidexterity: Strategies to Deal with Environmental Uncertainty // COSTING: Journal of Economic, Business and Accounting, 2024. Vol. 6. Is. 7. P. 2176–2187.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Phills J.A., Deiglmeier K., Miller D.T. (2008) Rediscovering Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review. P. 34–43.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">March J.G. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning // Organization Science. 1991. Vol. 2. Is. 1. Р. 71–87.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popov E.V., Omonov J.K., Naumov I.V., Veretennikova A.Y. (2018) Trends in the Development of Social Innovation. Terra Economicus. Vol. 16. No. 3. P. 36–59. DOI: 10.23683/2073-6606-2018-16-3-35-59</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Murray R., CaulierGrice J., Mulgan G. The Open Book of Social Innovation. London: National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts; Young Foundation, 2010.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rhodes M.L., McQuaid S., DonnellyCox G. (2021) Social Innovation and Temporary Innovations Systems (TIS): Insights from Naturebased Solutions in Europe. Social Enterprise Journal. Vol. 18. Is. 2. P. 252–270. DOI: 10.1108/SEJ0120210001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">O’Reilly C.A., Tushman M. Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present, and Future // Academy of Management Perspectives. 2013. Vol. 27. Is. 4. Р. 324–338. DOI: 10.5465/amp.2013.0025</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Seo D., Bryson J.M., Williams M. (2025) Nonprofit Sector Ambidexterity: A Framework for Understanding Innovation and Strategy Change in Nonprofit Organizations. Public Management Review. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2025.2452880</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Phills J.A., Deiglmeier K., Miller D.T. Rediscovering Social Innovation // Stanford Social Innovation Review. 2008. P. 34–43.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shafique I., Kalyar M.N., Shafique M., Kianto A., Beh L.-S. (2022) Demystifying the Link between Knowledge Management Capability and Innovation Ambidexterity: Organizational Structure as a Moderator. Business Process Management Journal. Vol. 28. Is. 5/6. P. 1343–1363. DOI: 10.1108/BPMJ-11-2021-0713</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rhodes M.L., McQuaid S., DonnellyCox G. Social Innovation and Temporary Innovations Systems (TIS): Insights from Naturebased Solutions in Europe // Social Enterprise Journal. 2021. Vol. 18. Is. 2. P. 252–270. DOI: 10.1108/SEJ0120210001</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shahriman M.F., Omar R. (2025) The Triadic Edge: Balancing Innovation, Risk, and Organizational Ambidexterity. Advances in Nonlinear Variational Inequalities. Vol. 28. Is. 5s. P. 79–93. DOI: 10.52783/anvi.v28.3652</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Seo D., Bryson J.M., Williams M. Nonprofit Sector Ambidexterity: A Framework for Understanding Innovation and Strategy Change in Nonprofit Organizations // Public Management Review. 2025. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2025.2452880</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shier M.L., Turpin A., Graham J.R. (2024) Partnership Dynamics That Support Social Innovation by Nonprofits. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. Vol. 35. P. 491–502. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-023-00612-9</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shafique I., Kalyar M.N., Shafique M., Kianto A., Beh L.-S. Demystifying the Link between Knowledge Management Capability and Innovation Ambidexterity: Organizational Structure as a Moderator // Business Process Management Journal. 2022. Vol. 28. Is. 5/6. P. 1343–1363. DOI: 10.1108/BPMJ-11-2021-0713</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sidorova A.A. (2023) Organizational Ambidexterity: Conceptual Foundations and Modern Approaches. Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye. Elektronnyy vestnik. No. 98. P. 86–95. DOI: 10.24412/2070-1381-2023-98-86-95</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shahriman M.F., Omar R. The Triadic Edge: Balancing Innovation, Risk, and Organizational Ambidexterity // Advances in Nonlinear Variational Inequalities. 2025. Vol. 28. Is. 5s. P. 79–93. DOI: 10.52783/anvi.v28.3652</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Soares J.L., Arantes A. (2021) Mediating Effect of Management Control Systems in The Interaction Between Ambidexterity and Organizational Learning in Brazilian NPO. Journal of Technology Management &amp; Innovation. Vol. 16. Is. 2. P. 56–69. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-27242021000200056</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shier M.L., Turpin A., Graham J.R. Partnership Dynamics That Support Social Innovation by Nonprofits // International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 2024. Vol. 35. P. 491–502. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-023-00612-9</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Úbeda-García M., Claver-Cortés E., Marco-Lajara B., Zaragoza-Sáez P. (2020) Toward a Dynamic Construction of Organizational Ambidexterity: Exploring the Synergies between Structural Differentiation, Organizational Context, and Interorganizational Relations. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 112. Р. 363–372. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.051</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Soares J.L., Arantes A. Mediating Effect of Management Control Systems in the Interaction between Ambidexterity and Organizational Learning in Brazilian NPO // Journal of Technology Management &amp; Innovation. 2021. Vol. 16. Is. 2. P. 56–69. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-27242021000200056</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Veretennikova A.Yu., Omonov Zh.K. (2018) Development and Introduction of Social Innovations in the Civil Society. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 84–95.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The International Handbook on Social Innovation. Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research / edited by F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, A. Hamdouch. Cheltenham / Northhampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2013.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Voronov A.S., Isaeva A.E. (2023) Business Ecosystem and Its Impact on Public Administration of Business Activities: Theoretical Overview of the Subject Area. Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye. Elektronnyy vestnik. No. 97. P. 138–154. DOI: 10.24412/2070-1381-2023-97-138-154</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Úbeda-García M., Claver-Cortés E., Marco-Lajara B., Zaragoza-Sáez P. Toward a Dynamic Construction of Organizational Ambidexterity: Exploring the Synergies between Structural Differentiation, Organizational Context, and Interorganizational Relations // Journal of Business Research. 2020. Vol. 112. Р. 363–372. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.051</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zub A.T. (2011) Ekvifinal’nost’ v organizatsionnom proyektirovanii [Equifinality in organizational design]. Aktual’nye voprosy ekonomicheskikh nauk. No. 19. P. 10–19.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
